-
Posts
4586 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
12
hypervalent_iodine's Achievements
Scientist (10/13)
1.4k
Reputation
Single Status Update
See all updates by hypervalent_iodine
-
On my recent thread on conspiracies, it was posted in the politics section, and it was about politics. As I said in the intro, SOME conspiracies are true, eg, Bay of Pigs, Watergate, plots to kill Castro, etc. All accepted history, fully documented and undisputed. A full list would be huge.
So why is this SUBJECT treated as rubbish, when some of it is verified history? Some are rubbish, some are not.
Today we have a journalist murdered in the Saudi Embassy being discussed on the news. Is it rubbish because it implies a conspiracy?
- Show previous comments 1 more
-
On the Kennedy Assassination that I led on wiki says " The HSCA (House select committee on assassinations) involved Congressional hearings and ultimately concluded that Oswald assassinated Kennedy, probably as the result of a conspiracy. The HSCA concluded that Oswald fired shots number one, two, and four, and that an unknown assassin fired shot number three"
The slippery slope argument would end up excluding much of history. In fact, 61 percent of Americans don't believe the official version.
So the House committee thinks conspiracy, hundreds of millions of Americans do too, but this forum "doesn't deal in conspiracy nonsense"
Seems like a conspiracy to me.
- Show next comments 3 more