John Cuthber

I don't know many hop heads, but based on a sample of one (Tkadm30) it seems that they have limited social skills in that they are unable to follow local etiquette, For example, by cherry picking data, failing to make his question clear, and ignoring previous information. Those actions are impolite on a science web page.

As I have pointed out before, the idea that smoking dope fine tunes anything is the sort of think you only believe while smoking. Seriously, a few billion year's worth of evolution worked to make your brain pretty damned good, and you still think you can improve it by getting stoned?

Yes I can provide the evidence. If any of this stuff was real they would have claimed the million dollars by now. Also, if you could really do these magic tricks you would have a great evolutionary advantage. So, such an ability would spread rapidly through a population and after a while, everybody would be able to do it. We can't, so the trait doesn't exist.

TLA Three letter acronym ETLA Extended three letter acronym

Why wouldn't they? We have 9 pages of stories saying that most of what Trump said was run-of-the-mill for the Republicans anyway. Trump was just a bit less subtle about his biggotry

It seems they have swapped their mind for power.

A mosquito was heard to complain, that a chemist had poisoned his brain The cause of his sorrow, was para dichloro diphenyl trichloroethane. (Not original- I wish it was)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymethylpentene

i wish

About a million years ago when I was a kid, there was in Scientific American magazine, an advert for a company who was demonstrating their ability to "think outside the box" by suggesting that power cables could be made from sodium. They had a point; it's not a bad conductor, and it's very cheap on a dollars per cubic metre basis. Obviously, three was a potential issue with rain- but, as they pointed out, many cables are coated with insulators. So they actually made cables from extruded polythene (which is cheap + boringly unreactive towards sodium) filled with sodium. I'm pretty sure you could do something similar with lithium. I can't be bothered to look up the melting temperatures at the moment. The metal and plastic won't have the same melting point so, if the metal is more refractory, extrude wires of it and dip them in molten plastic. if, on the otehr hand, the metal has the lower melting point, extrude plastic tubing and then pour molten metal into it. Halogenated materials are, in general, denser than hydrocarbons anyway.

Coating an alkali metal with a halogenated hydrocarbon probably counts as manufacturing an explosive under most jurisdictions.

I nodded off fora bit there. Did I miss the explanation of the fact that the "chain of begettings" only includes something like 10% or 1% of the people it should have*, and yet the rest of the book should be regarded as essentially correct and complete? * It explains about 6000 years, but we know that there have been people for something like 10 or 100 times longer (depending on what you actually count as "people")so something like 90% or 99% of it is missing with no note of this fact, nor any explanation. Of course, the other problem is that the "chain" only goes back to the first human. The first life goes back a few thousand times longer. But, according to the Bible we were all made within a week or so. So the "chain" needs to go back not just 6000 years but nearer 3,000,000,000 So 99.98% of it seems to be missing. Seems a bit shoddy for the "word of God".

It would be interesting to coat "lithium sand" with polythene and then you could put it in a cloth bag to use as s float. The failure of a small number wouldn't matter much. http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ja01856a501

How can you know that? It's not recorded anywhere is it? And, most of these "heroes and Godly people" only get 1 mention in the Book- and that's for the "begetting" they did. There's nothing very heroic about getting someone pregnant. Why not face the fact that you made that bit up in an attempt to cover up for the stupidity of the Bible?

You can't prove it. That's because there is no evidence. But it can buy you a lifetime. And the Bible is the simple answer "Goddidit". It's science that's complicated- and beautiful.

The Law of Leviticus was (and remains, according to what Matthew said about Christ's words) the law of God. What did you think it was? The law of the local metropolitan council? I read it; it makes no sense. Why have a big long record of A begat B and so on, but miss some out? If any of them is worth remembering, then they all are. However this also leads to another interestignproblem. If reading the list of begettings gives you the wrong answer, how do you know that reading the rest of (the whole or any part of) the Bible doesn't also lead to the wrong answer for essentially the same reason? Or were you just "cherrypicking"?

I did For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. It seems to me that he was citing Christ as saying things were not changing

Let's face it; nobody had to invent a conflict- there is one. This pretty much sums it up

"A large number of evil acts have been committed by atheist extremists. Lots of evil hints have been done by none religious people. " yes, but it wasn't done because they were atheist was it? That's the difference.religion tells people to be evil. Atheism doesn't. "Please note that in the bible, when listing names,father son ect, they often skip quite a few generations depending on the long line of ancestors, and the ones named were usually the "memorable" ones. This changed through out the bible." Where the heck did you pull that number out? Or did someone just make it up because otherwise the whole Bible looks a bit silly. "Also, quick question. Why are the native Americans even humans? After being separated for lon periods of time aren't species suppose to become 2 different species? This is an actual question BTW. " No strong evolutionary pressure to change and not nearly long enough. This is an obvious answer BTW. Your "actual question" didn't raise any issue with evolution: it just showed that you don't understand it.

It's not gold aluminate it might be a gold aluminide. It may well be an aluminium auride. It's probably best to think of it as an alloy, rather than a compound. If you melt the two metals together in a vacuum furnace you can get that purple alloy. It's very brittle + not a practical material for most jewellery.

So, if it was true then people should behave in the way that people should behave anyway. It seems that we can't tell if you are right and it doesn't matter anyway. Incidentally, you seem to be making some unsupported assessments of probability there. There's no reason to suppose that "the chance is so big "; it's just some idea you dreamed up.

I presume you are not able to answer the question: Can we tell? And the tacit question If we can't tell then can it matter?

It's possible that we are all in some "magical" way the same person. Can we tell? If we can't tell then it can't matter.

You resurrected a year old thread to say something which doesn't parse in English. Did you think that would help?

Science will also guide our future thinking. That's because science will change, though religion won't. That's the origin of the conflict, and nobody had to "invent" it.