TheVat

An entertaining look at human energy - mood, motivation, mitochondria, and everything else. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/11/08/energy-and-how-to-get-it

Bingo. And this observation was the core of the Huber family's statement on the verdict.

This may be a Canuck v USA slang issue. "Ya think, " in US parlance indicates agreement, with an undertone of "seems pretty obvious!" Which was in response to your saying something like "having ideological people carry open firearms" to such an event was a bad idea.

What is the evidence that Huber was doing anything but trying to disarm an emotionally unstable teenager on a shooting spree? How was that raising hell or breaking the law? Huber responded heroically to a clear-cut public danger and was murdered. Police, who were, contrary to sanity and any valid procedure, herding the crowd towards the vigilantes, did nothing when Rittenhouse gunned down the first victim. And nothing when Huber tried to stop him. And nothing when he maimed the third victim. And then allowed Rittenhouse to walk away. Who are the real lawbreakers here? Ya think??

Especially Wisconsin, which has very permissive laws regarding both carrying a long-barreled rifle and the standards for self defense. Though we can rightly condemn his actions, his provocations, and that an immature teenager was provided a gun, the law of that state provided reasonable doubt on his responsibility for what happened. What needs to change are the laws that smooth the way for RW vigilantism.

I learned today that an American teenager can illegally arm himself with an AR-15, then go out in the streets and act out his cowboy fantasies by taunting, goading, and then killing two people and wounding another, with zero legal consequences.

The maxim correlation is not causation seems pertinent here.

The sister website to this one (same URL except it's dot com) has several new JP threads started. Mostly some guy named Victor who posts a video and says look at this great video! Really sad that people waste their time on this dude's verbal flatulence. The main virtue of this thread is that it spins off other discussions that are not about JP and his misinformation factory.

Synopsis: the earth seems flat to a person because it is very large and you don't notice the curvature. How do you like my thinly coated spam?

LoL the revised Maslow hierarchy.

This is a case where US justice is more performative than anything else. There is abundant evidence that he is mentally ill and his condition allowed others to use him as a tool for their ends. Interesting that the Far Right plotters would make a mentally ill man their standard bearer. He would be better off in treatment rather than a cage, but that doesn't satisfy the felt need to make prominent examples.

Thank you, Yoda!

Haha! And when all else fails, reference MS-13. Whatever your critic stands for, make sure it includes rolling out the red carpet for Salvadoran murder gangs. And make sure your nearest Murdoch owned media outlet runs a continuous feed of MS-13 horror stories.

https://www.amazon.com/Hitlers-American-Model-United-States/dp/0691172420/ref=tmm_hrd_swatch_0?ots=1&tag=thneyo0f-20&linkCode=w50&_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr= Nazism triumphed in Germany during the high era of Jim Crow laws in the United States. Did the American regime of racial oppression in any way inspire the Nazis? The unsettling answer is yes. In Hitler's American Model, James Whitman presents a detailed investigation of the American impact on the notorious Nuremberg Laws, the centerpiece anti-Jewish legislation of the Nazi regime. Contrary to those who have insisted that there was no meaningful connection between American and German racial repression, Whitman demonstrates that the Nazis took a real, sustained, significant, and revealing interest in American race policies. As Whitman shows, the Nuremberg Laws were crafted in an atmosphere of considerable attention to the precedents American race laws had to offer. German praise for American practices, already found in Hitler's Mein Kampf, was continuous throughout the early 1930s, and the most radical Nazi lawyers were eager advocates of the use of American models. But while Jim Crow segregation was one aspect of American law that appealed to Nazi radicals, it was not the most consequential one. Rather, both American citizenship and antimiscegenation laws proved directly relevant to the two principal Nuremberg Laws―the Citizenship Law and the Blood Law. Whitman looks at the ultimate, ugly irony that when Nazis rejected American practices, it was sometimes not because they found them too enlightened, but too harsh....

I'm always a little skeptical that people are fully accepting of mortality and concomitant view that biological death is the termination point. Though any evidence otherwise, like the people whose hearts stop in the OR and claim to witness events outside, seem to be apocryphal. No rigorous study, controlling for normal sensory information paths, has found any credible indication of people leaving their bodies. But most of us, I suspect, hedge our bets a little. Sometimes with exotic parallel world theories, quantum immortality theories, matrix theories, morphic resonance, panpsychism, etc. Stuff that lives along the fringes of science. And I think a similar dynamic drives the whole uploading "singularity" movement, folks like Ray Kurzweil and Vernor Vinge. Sometimes derogatorily referred to as "geek rapture. "

Studio -- the latter just a wee joke. As in, gas can leak from pipes or from flues, but flowing electrons don't generally leak from wires and fill your bedroom or ignite. Was just a way of nodding to the safety factor for non-combustion sources. If heatpumps are viable in Scandinavia, that is encouraging. I will look into that. The principal objection you hear around here is that heatpump air is not as hot as furnace air, so you don't have the delicious fountain of hot air coming from the grates. This is part of the psychological aspect of comfort, I suppose.

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/11/12/1053509795/long-covid-causes-treatment-clues So far there are more theories than clear answers for what's going on, and there is good reason to think the varied constellation of symptoms could have different causes in different people. Maybe, in some, the virus is still hiding in the body somewhere, directly damaging nerves or other parts of the body. Maybe the chronic presence of the virus, or remnants of the virus, keeps the immune system kind of simmering at a low boil, causing the symptoms. Maybe the virus is gone but left the immune system out of whack, so it's now attacking the body. Or maybe there's another cause. "It's still early days. But we believe that long COVID is not caused by one thing. That there are multiple diseases that are happening," says Akiko Iwasaki, a professor of immunobiology at Yale University who is also studying long COVID-19. But Iwasaki and others have started finding some tantalizing clues in the blood of some patients. Those include unusual levels of cytokines, which are chemical messengers that the immune system uses to communicate, as well as proteins produced by the immune system known as autoantibodies, which attack cells and tissues in the body instead of the virus. "We are finding elevated cytokines in long-COVID patients and we're trying to decode what those cytokines mean. We're also seeing some distinct autoantibody reactivity and are trying to find out what those antibodies are doing and whether they are causing harm," Iwasaki says.

I live in South Dakota, which has bitter winters with regular blasts of Arctic air, so heat pumps still seem problematic here. I doubt the external air has much available heat at minus 20 F. (-29 C.) I have recently considered switching to electric furnace, since this state is now 70% green energy on its grid, and rapidly adding more (I think we are rated the second windiest out of the fifty states). And I generally dislike forms of energy that can leak in catastrophic ways, both in the household and in the field. Very few die in their sleep breathing electrons.

My sense is that you also have a bias, against the psychiatric profession. I have not seen you describe professionals in other science or medical based fields as "hugely biased pushing their own agenda," but I guess it's possible you do. This website often has members citing expert opinions, so I find it helpful if there is evidence (when rejecting said opinion) that the expertise is questionable or compromised. Psychiatrists and psychologists I have known through my work seem mainly motivated to help people get better, and are not fooled by superficial charm or poseurs. If you have evidence they are scamming us, please post it.

In the complete post you quoted from, I had hoped to make clear my distinction and avoid confusion, but I think you are correct this was muddy. I was speaking of unambiguous and extreme cases, as in your horrific example case. I meant I oppose death as a penalty, as the satisfaction of some sort of debt, but that I feel that euthanasia can be done where it is bringing an end to suffering. An individual so sick and depraved that they would beat and rape a small child would be finding mercy in death rather than a penalty. I agree that there are many other cases of sexual offense where the danger of wrongful convictions is significant and a sentence of such finality would be wrong.

Looking in again, get the impression you are somewhat talking past each other. I think the pressured-to-quit example is being used as a sort of "representative anecdote" of a broad cultural repression of certain kinds of speech. Really could have its own thread, since it seems more about what Jon Ronson called the shaming culture, and less about legal restrictions on behavior. I don't think anyone here would disagree that learning institutions should embody free discourse and not doing dogpiles on unpopular opinions to where teachers feel forced out. So it seems like a red herring, really. But I may have missed stuff here - things got busy in the Vat household the past week or so.

The example of extreme sexual predators often comes up, since it is the most extreme test of any rehabilitative philosophy. My impression is that such persons cannot be cured, and some are so sick that a reasonable case for euthanasia could be made. While I object to the death penalty for several reasons, I would see someone raping a seven year old - as in @beecee example - as a candidate for euthanasia. As for the parents, I cannot imagine being them and not wanting the sick creature removed from the planet promptly. We cannot argue moral principles of justice solely from the wishes of angry and traumatized parents, but we can argue from the principle of mercy, both towards the perpetrator and the victims.

Bilingual but my ear can't keep up well in French conversation. Reading and speaking is no problem. I love Italian. Loved hearing it spoken when I was in Italy (and a predominantly Italian neighborhood in New England where I lived for three years) and hearing it sung. Italian also my favorite cuisine, so if there is such a thing as reincarnation I would be molto felice to be reborn in Italy. I suspect one cognitive advantage of bilingualism is that each language encodes certain ways of thinking, so your overall thinking is more versatile and better able to handle shifts of perspective. A propos of Geordief comment on too closely similar languages, I pick up some Spanish where I live, which I can see adversely affecting future Italian acquisition.

As long as Brits don't expect me to call a possum a possium, I'm good.

Yes, plus one, I think gods could function as proxy elders whose presence could be useful when no actual adults were supervising. Grab an anthropologist and you likely are offered quite a few positive social mechanisms that some form of theism provided. Helping parents, easing group's fears of nature's whims, promoting lawfulness, reducing anxiety about death, promoting stewardship of nature, etc.