QuantumT

Thanks for letting me down easy. Again. So you read the full study?

Thank you very much for your replies and the links. But I get the feeling that you didn't bother to read the OP article, and might be unaware of the extensive research put into it. It's not a new attempt based on old data, but a comparison between the two models, based on recently discovered shortcomings (of CDM) and (fixed) computational mistakes. Here's a few key excerpts. Comparing CDM and MOND after error correction: Diagrams: Conclusion: The full study: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/7/1331/htm Note: Being from a not-English-speaking country I might have chosen some wrong words to describe certain things. Sorry about that.

I'm just the messenger, and wanted the opinions of you fine gentlemen. Sorry for putting this in the wrong section. It sounded like news to me.

https://theconversation.com/dark-matter-our-review-suggests-its-time-to-ditch-it-in-favour-of-a-new-theory-of-gravity-186344 So, the question is: Is Mond good enough to gain consensus favor?

The suggestion I like the most, about the nature of DM, is also the most simple, and least mysterious: Ground state hydrogen https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/71525

Walking around with a loaded gun, makes you a public health risk.

I was referring to the split-second after the big bang, when there were only heat, radiation, quarks and electrons. My hypothesis was that the intense heat, present at that moment, turned into gluons. I was wrong. The math don't work. (Although I am not sure it our current math applies to that specific moment.) But I'm quite sure swansont knows what he's talking about. So I must be wrong.

Due to the enormous distances in space, alien visitors are extremely unlikely. How would they even find us? A lucky coincidence? Nah.... Underground people?! C'mon! To travel back in time violates the laws of nature. That only leaves one option. An option that sounds ridiculous, unless we live in a simulation... That is why option number two got my vote. It seems like woo, but it isn't, in a simulated reality.

Thank you!

Existence, the universe and how nature works, is constantly on my mind. I can't help myself. I just want to learn as much as I possibly can about reality, and I will probably keep wondering about it 'till the day I die. Sometimes I get an idea, that I've never heard about, and I think 'wow, that makes sense', so I google it to see if it's a well known theory. Sometimes it is, sometimes it's not, and sometimes I get nothing. Not even a repudiation. This is one of those. So here goes: Could most of the heat from the big bang have turned into the strong nuclear force? (The rest would then be the CBR.) Thank you, in advance, for taking time to consider my question.

Thank you! So the universe, as a whole, has no geometry?

If the universe has the geometrical shape of a balloons surface, a hollow sphere, does it then have a true vacuum in the middle? Sorry if my question is stupid, but the shape itself is something I've always wondered about. Please don't downrate me.

https://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-achieve-transformational-breakthrough-in-scaling-up-quantum-computers

There is quantum fluctuation, there is zero energy universe, there is M-theory and there is conformal cyclic cosmology. Take your pick. There are plenty of ways to come from nowhere. The universe is not necessarily limited by our need for logic.

I tried to remove the limit on my bittorrent, while downloading, and it showed the bittorrent client taking up to 50% of the CPU. Another 10% went to my firewall, and up to 10% went to "systeminterrupts". qBittorrent: 40-50% Zonealarm: 7-10% Systeminterrupts: 5-10%