Sensei

Crocodiles (due to evolution) have their eyes and noses on top so they can see their prey and breathe while hidden under the surface of the water. Can you see such adaptation in the construction of the T. Rex?

Analyzing an animal's appearance tells us what environment it evolved in and what it best fits into. Wetlands are rather poor in food. See what animals live there now - crocodiles and birds that catch fish. In Africa's wetlands, hippos. Your theory should show us what kind of animals would eat these T.Rex..

You know the game from a first person perspective.. ? ..what happened to the buttons on the remote control.. ? ..I just did this.. in my previous post.. ..aren't we talking.. ?

Want the source code of a search engine like Google? I give it away to mortals like you, like candy, these days..

If I put your post into the translator and vice versa, I get: "Older people have sucked it up longer, so they are generally more up to date. " What did you mean when you said that they are more "fed"? Accustomed, indoctrinated, stupefied? The indoctrinated person shares the same view that was pressed upon him live.. Are you indoctrinated by government and mass media? What is happening in Gaza is basically mass murder and the creation of new "terrorists" in the coming years and decades.. When you bomb people who have nothing to do with the attack on X, Y, Z, survivors, family, friends, etc. etc. expect. Revenge. And the cycle begins... Hamas committed mass murder, (because of crimes committed by Israel you have no idea about..) And then Israel committed mass murder. Multiplied by 5x by now. And created even more enemies wanting to revenge and retaliation..

..the last time I saw an American IRL it was at the Casino and it was 10+ years ago.. We played black jack. It was a fun time, not like today..

..to a certain level, I agree.. ps. I appreciate the sense of humor..

..anti-Russian agents have an easy job.. they just have to follow the dogs.. following the smell.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Footwrap

..and you don't change your socks..

What a good start for your discussion. You have posted a lot of material so it will probably take some time for folks to read and digest. There are several members interested in aspects of AI here. Aren't you proof that this is possible?

..people who have been banned here in the past were asked to show their math when they came up with their "pet theory" with just words.. ..in the "reincarnation" (aka "sockpuppet") account they learned to use math because they were told to use math to prove their words..

Generally speaking, yes. The only thing that can make them dangerous is radioactivity. A few hand-wash cycles, then put them in the dishwasher for a few hours and they will be clean. High temperatures are lethal to most organisms. Basically, their organic compounds decompose or degenerate.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extremophile

Haven't you seen Gordon Ramsay's Hell's Kitchen? They could kill you for ignorance..

I don't think so. The marinade is used to make a sauce for the meat. The breaded meat has a much thicker layer, but you still eat the bread. If there are compounds with unpaired electrons, or products from their reactions, etc., you still eat it, you don't throw it away.. Open fire cooking, when fire and smoke literally licks the meat, is the most dangerous. Smoke has compounds with unpaired electrons which are highly reactive. For the same reason people smoking cigarettes or other stuff, get cancer of lungs.

Before and after. Search the net for "marinating the meat"..

Don't think. Buy a powerbank. Power it up. And verify its capacity..

Shocking only to the layman.... Everyone else can see the difference between a "full battery" and an "empty battery".... Collisions between two bodies should be calculated in the center-of-mass regime. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_of_mass From CoM frame-of-reference, you should go to lab-frame-of-reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local_reference_frame At non-relativistic speeds, i.e. in ordinary life situations, this is simplified to Newton's equations.

Two true sentences in the forum-life.. My programmers do what I want.. Even though I dislike LaTeX, I disagree. Equations can be very cumbersome and complex. The problem is forum software which does not preview in real-time what you write. For me, writing equation in LaTeX is easy, just as easy is writing in Python, or C/C++. Learn something and come back to us.. ..it depends on the device.. On PC ("desktop computer"/"laptop") not really..

U wish!

Consider, done:

@studiot nice try, that's the point. How many things with energy (potential energy, usually in chemical bonds) are needed for things we need..

Laptop battery, cell phone battery certainly have no momentum.. They have a capacity expressed on the label as, for example, 10000 mAh. mA = 0.001 A h = 3600s Q=I*t I = 10000 mA = 10 A Q=10A * 3600s = 36000 C i.e. the device will work for 1h at 10A, or 10h at 1A (assuming no losses and lower voltage, which is unreliable) E= Q*U U is typically 3.6 V for Li-on battery.. @Ghideon Do you want to become a billionaire? You'll be the second administrator.. You gave me an idea.. Objects which have melting point at lower T than STP "attracts" energy in any form from the world. Every object takes energy and releases it into the world. In "ambient temperature," what goes out, is what comes in, and we have an equilibrium. Transition from solid state to liquid state takes additional energy. Transition from liquid state to gaseous state takes additional energy. Transition from gaseous state to plasma state takes additional energy. (This is called ionization energy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionization_energy ) There are others for the high energy regime in quantum physics.

Energy is a physical thing, that is, you can certainly feel the difference between hot coffee/tea and cold coffee/tea. The question should be "how much leakage" of this energy, if any, instead of this crap: "Energy is NONSENSE". If it's 0.00000000001 then you should show it. We would have at least had some scientific discussion on your part. But you are not able to. You are not able to, because physics and chemistry are experimental. Theoretical physics is something new in the 20th century. To become a theoretical physicist, you have to learn everything about experimental physics, chemistry, etc. Laymen on the Internet tend to skip the whole learning process and just post their useless drivel on science forums without bothering to acquire everything that real scientists took years of study. Check sandbox: https://www.scienceforums.net/forum/99-the-sandbox/ There, even well-known members practiced..

The word "energy" (in one form or another) existed before physics and chemistry. We used to say "young people have a lot of energy", "old people don't have the energy to ...", "sick people don't have energy", etc. Energy is the ability to do something. Solid CO2 does not have the ability to do something, while liquid O2 has the ability to do something (burn with something and release "stored energy"). Basically, energy is like mass, energy before reaction is equal to energy after reaction. The mass before the reaction is equal to the mass after the reaction (in chemistry). A+B=C+D. So whatever you want to solve is equal. At the beginning of science, the equation was at the level of mass, which is true to some level of certainity. Then at energy level, which a way way more precise. Energy is stored in various ways. The potential energy of a nucleus (which can be released during fusion, fission, spontaneous decay, etc. ), the energy bound between atoms or molecules, the potential energy of an object at a certain height above the ground, etc., etc., or the kinetic energy of an object or the rotational energy of an object..