Physics

What is the language of universe ???

What is the way to travel in other dimensions ???

I do not know if this has been asked here before. I could find nothing about it, so I thought I would ask. If there was to be a large particle collider build out-side of the earths' gravitational pull. Would the results be the same after a collision? Furthermore, if there were to be 3 built around the earth in a way that formed an atom and they were to used at the same time. Theoreticaly, would that do anything? like slow the earths spin or speed it up or destroy everything? just something that crossed my mind.

Does the moon have a pulling effect on a big object, like a building? I know it attracts the sea to make tides. What if a skyscraper was built on pistons? Would the moon pull and rease the building, thereby moving the pistons to create energy? Thanks. url removed

Absolutely; everything “IS”. But due to the reference frame of different procedural step of its quantum being; “EVERYTHING WAS AND IT WILL BE”. And this “IS” relativity from univaso science point of view of res extensa verses res cogitan. For example; thunder and lightening are caused at the same time, but the difference in the procedural quantum steps of accessing there being as a function of the reference frame of the consciousness, subjects them to different times of effect, and this is E=MQ2. Let me re-use the ordinary example illustrated from my previous work that can establish the equilibrium frame work between relativism, absolutism and E=MQ2 as a function o…

I have no degree or masters I am a trained carpenter and now a top class chef so please be gentle. I have become interested in theoretical physics and have learnt a few things in my spare time mainly from you tube. so would like to ask if we exist in an infinate amount of universe's but someone finds out how to unify them wouldn't we therefore be able ourselves to predetermine our outcomes and as I am lead to believe would be detrimental!!!. As I say I am a little fish in a big pond and do not even understand the equations you guys use or have any knowledge really but I would like to learn and hey I can hang your doors and cook you food and underdstand string theory so…

I was having a conversation with a girl from Japan today, and it lead to a very interesting question: why do we think the sun is yellow? The conversation started when someone mentioned the color of the sun being yellow, and she (the girl from Japan) interjected and said "No, it's orange". Eventually, she explained to us that in Japan, they actually think of the sun as orange, and children there, when they color drawings of the sun, will use orange. It lead to speculations that during evening, when you look at the sun, it does look orange. So why do we in the west have a noon-time bias when it comes to the color of the sun? Furthermore, it stands to question how we…

Then in a sense, is it as good as non-existent? There are two factors here. The first being that another universe, totally seperate from ours, will have no relation to our passage of time. So you can't really say that it occurs before, or after, or concurrently to our universe, since what we know as time only began with this universe. Is this correct? The other is the concept of 'nothing', as described by Lawrence Krauss. That is, the idea that 'nothing' doesn't actually exist. We mere mortals cannot comprehend 'nothing', and there is nowhere in the observable universe that consists of 'nothing'. I would take that a step further and say that there is no such thi…

Could high frequency bosons feel a Time Dilation effect to give them Mass. I was wondering if the Higgs Field acted in a similar manner to the speed of light barrier.

Argues the SLS as early as 2017 can be used to launch manned lunar lander missions: SLS for Return to the Moon by the 50th Anniversary of Apollo 11. blog advertising link removed by Moderator Bob Clark

Which step we obtain gravity?

I'm doing a project with polystyrene nanobeads as standard size measurement on a device. We ordered some nanobeads from a company, 100nm, 1µm and 5µm. They are all 100mg/ml and solved in water with sds in it. When i dilute them to 1 mg/ml it seems the 1µm is a lot more dense then the 100 nm and 5µm, we contacted the company and they said everything was ok. does anyone have experience with these nanobeads and is it normal or explainable that the 1µm look a lot more "milky" then the 100nm and 5µm when they are the same concentration?

In my room I have a clothing cubby near a window (window that has one sheet of glass, with half an inch of space between another layer of glass. So two layers basically with half an inch of space inbetween) , and only in the morning from 7:30-8:50 AM does the sun leak through the window onto my cubby. I have window blinds (the ones with the slats) and it does block most of the sun, but it still leaks some sun light onto the cubby. I've had it like this for 2 months (from October till now), my concern is will the morning uv ray be enough to bleach/lighten my clothing? I really like my cubby in its location and the sun only shines on it for an three hours a day. (easy to …

The goal is to create a device that moves each and every particle of a particular object to a new location instantly at the same time thus transforming this object into another.(for example a spoon into a cup by rearranging its molecules or one chemical element into another by rearranging its subatomic particles(not by nuclear reacton). What method can be used? Maybe it can be done by using some sort of nanorobots or quantum teleportation? The process itself is possible since it does not violate the laws of physics. Any tips? Note: don't start any philosophical discussions or anything like that.

sorry if it's in the wrong spot, but I'm not sure where it goes. So I've read that scientists have found and isolated anti-matter, and want to do experiments on it. I haven't found any articles about experiments and stuff, so I'm just wondering what do scientist know about anti-matter, and what are they still trying to find out?

Is the photon carrier more important than photon? When photon carrying system is built?

http://ctrlv.in/139005 Hi, Ive been running these particle simulations the last few months, and I dont know what exactly these fields are. If you know, or you know someone that could know... thatd be great! It would be nice to know the mathematical formulas for these things

ok so i was talking to my chem teacher and he was mentioning something about energy lost when nuclear reactions and particle annihilation reactions happen or maybe not energy but i am just asking how much truth and fiction there is to this and where i can start to do research on such a subject

What is the 0 energy system? 0K ? No mass? But gravity force can pass through it. And electro magnetic wave also passes through it. The system has a volume too.

I'm still learning the ropes of Physics but I really enjoy it and I remember being fascinated by light moving at "C" no matter what reference frame you measure it in. I know this is pretty basic stuff but, what are your perhaps more complicated aspects you found the most interesting or unbelievable? The double slit experiment is another one for me, that stuff was alien to me when I first researched it a little. Also, even though I don't post much at all here, it's fun to lurk and learn from you guys as I assume a lot of people do.

I have a simple question Where the first photons were created? Inside the first generation of stars? or at the beginning, when electromagnetism was created?

Hi everyone, I am new here, but I have a question I have been thinking about a lot. The force of gravity is one of the fundemental forces in nature. But my main question is, what actually generates the force itself? Now I know of course that gravity is proportional to the mass of an object, but that must mean that every atom on it's own, generates a very tiny amount of gravitational force - right? So is it the nucleus, electrons, quarks, the charge of the atom or something entirely different that actually generates the force? All the research I have been able to find about gravity, never really covers the subject of the force itself, but rather more it's eff…

I assume light have no mass also gravitational force only works with mass and light can be pulled by gravity field. Those 3 things can be mentioned in scientific documents. But i see there is a contradiction .Or is there anything i know wrong? How can i solve this paradox?

Seemingly in Physics we are interested in measurable concepts. Does it mean that these concepts are measurable also? Have we "measurable" but Incomputable concepts in Physics?

Ever since I started taking milk in my coffee, I figured out that it was much more efficient to take advantage of the energy involved in pouring the coffee into the milk to mix it in, rather than pouring the coffee first and then stirring the milk in with a spoon. Not only do I skip the effort of stirring, I also don't have to spend more energy washing the spoon, and the cold spoon doesn't reduce the temperature of my coffee. It's not a lazy thing, it just appeals to my sense of efficiency. A couple of weeks ago, I got a traffic ticket for not stopping completely at a stop sign. I started monitoring myself and realized I did it a lot! It's not impatience so much as ta…