dimreepr

It doesn't, my point has been the nebulous nature of who is to blame in a court of law; Pablo Escobar built his own prison with an escape hatch. "what-is-the-legal-significance-of-evidence-provided-by-ai" AI will become ever more significant in line with it's perceived value.

If nothing is true (and it is), then consciousness is something, therefore consciousness can only exist in something When I'm dead, I'll have nothing to say. 😉

The truth about facts are, a lot of them will be wrong in a year or two...

Neither does mine, but the internet still work's...

I think it's both very complicated and very simple: "The limits of my language means the limits of my world." - Wittgenstein Culture is one of many filters that determine both truth, and to a lesser extent, facts; most of what we think of as objective facts, is via an editor of some sort...

It's kinda religious, but without the grounding of a wise decision...

I've got a tenner, that says, if he returns, he'll disagree...

No, it's far more nebulous than that... Wasn't the internet built to bypass any stoppage?

Perhaps, but did you even consider the possibility that I was agreing with you?

This is the article that triggered my question... I'm suggesting that in a court of law, this co-founder could argue that he has washed his hand's of any responsibility due to his warning of the danger his AI presents, even if he continues to work on the project.

That really looks like an assumed authority...

We have an AI creator 'Anthropic' warning us that we're in danger of losing control of AI development since they're writing their own code. Is 'Anthropic' at fault for the consequences of ignoring that warning?

Indeed, how often do some people get angry, when you innocently ask them to explain how <insert true fact> actually works; and it's true throughout the IQ bandwidth/spectrum/humanity... It usually comes from an assumed authority...

And we're back to the orbiting teapot, the title of the topic is "Could aliens ever visit earth?" and even you seem to be admitting it's highly, verging on the impossible, unlikely; so what's the point? Indeed and the ship had to be 70,000 tons, to balance the forces IIRC.

You said yourself, I'm paraphrasing, 'Why would a space faring civilisation waste resources visiting a gravity well, when all their needs are met'. Besides, if travelling slowly wouldn't they be more susceptible to being dragged into the well? A teapot orbiting Jupiter, is perfectly possible but since I can't interact with it, it's not worth the effort to justify it;s existence.