Jump to content

Our mind.


curiousone

Recommended Posts

Is our mind inside or outside of our brain? Our mind is spiritual where our brain is biological. Which part the mind or the brain holds our emotions? I'm for our mind. It' said our emotions are in our brain? It is also said that our thoughts are in our mind and not our brain. What say you? Mind one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is our mind inside or outside of our brain? Our mind is spiritual where our brain is biological. Which part the mind or the brain holds our emotions? I'm for our mind. It' said our emotions are in our brain? It is also said that our thoughts are in our mind and not our brain. What say you? Mind one

 

It's actually fairly simple; Brain + Language = Mind.

 

We all experience the mind but neither "brain" nor "language" is what we think it is. The brain, for instance, is the entire nervous system plus the entire biological organism as it existed at birth. Some of the organism is nearly incidental to "mind" because they do not directly affect it. Ironically much of the structure (nervous) not directly affecting the mind is actually in the brain.

 

Language is simply a shared belief system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is our mind inside or outside of our brain? Our mind is spiritual where our brain is biological. Which part the mind or the brain holds our emotions? I'm for our mind. It' said our emotions are in our brain? It is also said that our thoughts are in our mind and not our brain. What say you? Mind one

 

Mind, in my opinion, is the environment of cognitive activity within the brain that arises from brain function. In the brain, a mind is quantified by a functional capacity to integrate diverse sensory input (visual, tactile, auditory, etc.) through a process that produces behaviors independent of instinct. Essentially, a mind enables and evinced by proactive rather than reactive behaviors. I arrived at this perspective through the research I did several years ago for a book about the dreaming brain. In my opinion, a mind cannot exist without a neurological network (or equivalent) as its progenitor. I welcome your thoughts.

Edited by DrmDoc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is light inside or outside of a candle? Light travels and can fill a space where a candle is inanimate and stationary. Which part of a candle holds heat? I'm for light. It' said light is in a candle? It is also said that reflections of light are of light and not in a candle. What say you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

looking for the mind in the brain is like looking into your television for the actors :P

 

That is one of those clever-sounding but shallow arguments that don't really work.

 

If by "television" you mean the entire television industry: studios, broadcasting equipment, manufacturers, supporting services ... oh, and the TV set then looking for the actors in "television makes perfect sense.

 

Your analogy is like: trying to understand sight by just looking at the lens of the eye. (Because nearly all of the sense of sight is handled by the brain.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is our mind inside or outside of our brain? Our mind is spiritual where our brain is biological. Which part the mind or the brain holds our emotions? I'm for our mind. It' said our emotions are in our brain? It is also said that our thoughts are in our mind and not our brain. What say you? Mind one

 

I Think this is a good place to start:

 

http://www.informationphilosopher.com/problems/mind_body/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

looking for the mind in the brain is like looking into your television for the actors :P

 

If you are serious, you're suggesting that the brain is merely a prism and the mind a projection from some outer-body location. If true, can you prove it? Can you prove, beyond belief or faith alone, that mind is a product of something other than brain function?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Professor Lipton, Heartmath institue,

 

"the stomach sends more signals to the brain than the brain sends to the stomach"

 

"The stomach lining is made from the same material as the brain"

 

 

Consiousness is infinite, unfettered and unaffected by space and time as these are PRODUCTS OF THE MIND!

 


If true, can you prove it? Can you prove, beyond belief or faith alone, that mind is a product of something other than brain function?

 

 

No, can you?

 

You are missing the point, the mind is not part of the body, the body is a hologram created by the mind!

 

"it is your mind that creates this world"

Buddah

 

get-attachment-191.jpg

Edited by Confusi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are missing the point, the mind is not part of the body, the body is a hologram created by the mind!

 

And this explanation helps us how? Is this a case where nothing really changes for us, but you get to believe your unsupported fantasies? It sounds like your belief doesn't impact me in any way, so go for it, if that's what you choose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If true, can you prove it? Can you prove, beyond belief or faith alone, that mind is a product of something other than brain function?

 

 

No, can you?

 

You are missing the point, the mind is not part of the body, the body is a hologram created by the mind!

 

"it is your mind that creates this world"

No, I can't prove that the mind is a product of something other than brain function. However, I can prove--through an abundance of brain trauma studies--that a mind is not evident amid brain death, which is very convincing evidences of what produces the mind, in my opinion.

Edited by DrmDoc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, I can't prove that the mind is a product of something other than brain function. However, I can prove--through an abundance of brain trauma studies--that a mind is not evident amid brain death, which is very convincing evidences of what produces the mind, in my opinion.

This only brings a "chicken and egg" scenario though!

 

Permit me an analogy,

The brain is the computer, controls the body.

 

The mind is the internet, infinite information streaming into it.

 

If the computer breaks down, no information.

 

If it was a breakdown of just the sound and video cards that broke down, we may think that there is no information in the computer, but there would be, we are just unable to access it!

 

Further to this, as the physicists know, matter is created by mostly empty space, it is in fact an illusion, created by the focus of mind.

 

 

@Phi, I wasn't lashing out, I was just saying we both have as much proof as the other, it is, and can only ever be, a matter of opinion, my opinion is no more ridiculous than yours

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Phi, I wasn't lashing out, I was just saying we both have as much proof as the other, it is, and can only ever be, a matter of opinion, my opinion is no more ridiculous than yours

 

Proof of what? What did I propose, as you have, that I have no supportive evidence for?

 

Or are you saying that my questioning your argument is without support? Because there's plenty of evidence that what we call "the mind" is a function of the brain and its systems. We also have no reason to believe our bodies are holograms, especially when empirical evidence heavily suggests otherwise.

 

So why would you think your opinion is not ridiculous compared to what we have evidence for? My argument doesn't rely on opinion, and maybe that's where we're getting our wires crossed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This only brings a "chicken and egg" scenario though!

 

Permit me an analogy,

The brain is the computer, controls the body.

 

The mind is the internet, infinite information streaming into it.

 

If the computer breaks down, no information.

 

If it was a breakdown of just the sound and video cards that broke down, we may think that there is no information in the computer, but there would be, we are just unable to access it!

 

Further to this, as the physicists know, matter is created by mostly empty space, it is in fact an illusion, created by the focus of mind.

 

 

 

I understand that it is just an analogy but, excuse me for saying so, it is a poor one. All the information on the Internet is generated by computers. The innformation you are referencing requires computers; no computers, no Internet. The Internet is multiple computers sharing information and not multiple computers tapping into the existence of information. When a single computer breaks the Internet is still there because other computers are still there. Break enough computers and bye bye Internet. Break any single computer (destory) and bye bye all unique informant that specific computer stored.

 

Matter is energy and empt space is sort of a meaningless term. Perhap you meant vacuum; either way it doesn't related to the biology of the brain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The mind is the internet, infinite information streaming into it.

 

Do you have any evidence that the mind is like that? I don't get the impression that you, or anyone else, has infinite information flowing into their mind.

 

I wasn't lashing out, I was just saying we both have as much proof as the other, it is, and can only ever be, a matter of opinion, my opinion is no more ridiculous than yours

 

There is evidence that indicates the possibility/likelihood that the brain gives rise to the mind. There is zero evidence that the mind exists independently of the brain.

 

So it is clear that only one of those choices is opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand that it is just an analogy but, excuse me for saying so, it is a poor one.

 

I've heard many experts say that this particular popsci analogy, brain = computer, is responsible for a great deal of misunderstanding. It's not just that it's wrong, it often leads people to make several misinformed leaps that are very difficult to recover from once taken.

 

It's a gateway analogy that leads to crackpotism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've heard many experts say that this particular popsci analogy, brain = computer, is responsible for a great deal of misunderstanding. It's not just that it's wrong, it often leads people to make several misinformed leaps that are very difficult to recover from once taken.

 

 

It's a gateway analogy that leads to crackpotism.

 

I agree completely. In my opinion analogies are great for describing interpersonal situations but are mostly just a lazy convinience when explaining functional processes. The better one understands the subject matter they are dicussing less they should need analogies unless that which they are seeking to explain is behavioral/emotional. In the case of an emotional subject an analogy may help trigger a similar state of feeling. A boxing analogy may be easy to create to lighten someone's spirits after they lose a job or spouse but an analogy explaining how the Earth rotates around the Sun is more tricky. Better to just explain some things in dry terms.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The better one understands the subject matter they are dicussing less they should need analogies unless that which they are seeking to explain is behavioral/emotional.

 

I agree with the first part wholeheartedly. I tend not to trust that my audience will understand the mainstream explanation, and stray into ineffective analogy too often. Bad habit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

If you are serious, you're suggesting that the brain is merely a prism and the mind a projection from some outer-body location. If true, can you prove it? Can you prove, beyond belief or faith alone, that mind is a product of something other than brain function?

I used to think this was the case due to certain experiences which for the life of me I could not imagine how they were in my own brain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent arguments all. What is matter made of, and come from? The statement mind over matter, can matter be spiritual? I hear my voice in my mind? All of this leads to spirit/soul. curiousone :confused:

E=mc^2 is a version of Einstein's famous relativity equation. Specifically, it means that energy is equal to mass multiplied by the speed of light squared. While seemingly simple, this equation has many profound implications, chief among them being that matter and energy are actually the same stuff. Pure energy in the form of motion can be converted into matter, through the creation of a particle, which has mass. However, as the equation implies, it takes a huge amount of energy to create a tiny bit of mass.

http://www.livescience.com/32363-what-does-emc2-mean-.html

 

 

Hearing and thought are not one in the same. Deaf people can think despite not being about to hear. Can you better explain what you believe "I hear my own voice in my mind" means? I don't want to start walking down the road talking about electrical impulses and brain function if you are under the impression that there is sound vibrating in your head, coming from your soul, that you are hearing when you think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.