If you could,
1) which is stronger, the ring or the disc magnet? Which would be harder to push up against the stationary magnet if you tried?
[Thinh Nghiem] The ring magnet is stronger
2) how many degrees, roughly, does it rotate when you first get the thing started (the most it rotates back and forth)?
[Thinh Nghiem] 180 degree, then this value is reduced manually until stopping
3) does it act differently when you remove the stationary magnet?
[Thinh Nghiem] No, it rotates and slow down either
4) do you have video?
[Thinh Nghiem] The size limitation of attached file in this forum does not allow me to attach video file
Thanks
Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!
|
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.
|
|
| Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse | |
PERPETUAL MOTION Description of my experiment to make a perpetual motion
#22 29 December 2011 - 05:37 PM
thinhnghiem, on 29 December 2011 - 05:30 AM, said:
If you could,
1) which is stronger, the ring or the disc magnet? Which would be harder to push up against the stationary magnet if you tried?
[Thinh Nghiem] The ring magnet is stronger
2) how many degrees, roughly, does it rotate when you first get the thing started (the most it rotates back and forth)?
[Thinh Nghiem] 180 degree, then this value is reduced manually until stopping
1) which is stronger, the ring or the disc magnet? Which would be harder to push up against the stationary magnet if you tried?
[Thinh Nghiem] The ring magnet is stronger
2) how many degrees, roughly, does it rotate when you first get the thing started (the most it rotates back and forth)?
[Thinh Nghiem] 180 degree, then this value is reduced manually until stopping
It would make sense if the disk magnet pointed at the ring magnet when it was done. As it rotates out of that position it encounters stronger repulsion.
thinhnghiem, on 29 December 2011 - 05:30 AM, said:
3) does it act differently when you remove the stationary magnet?
[Thinh Nghiem] No, it rotates and slow down either
[Thinh Nghiem] No, it rotates and slow down either
It doesn't? So... the magnets may not be interacting with each other at all? It may just be the elastic potential of the string wiggling it back and forth with negligible influence from the magnets?
- Posts: 724 | Joined: 11-August 08
Reply
#25 31 December 2011 - 12:03 PM
doG, on 26 December 2011 - 09:27 PM, said:
No. Earth will eventually become tidal locked with the sun as Mercury has.
Theory predicts the sun will enlarge to engulf the Earth as it runs out of fuel.
Didn't Newton effectively state in his first law that all motion is perpetual until acted on by an external force?
Theory predicts the sun will enlarge to engulf the Earth as it runs out of fuel.
Didn't Newton effectively state in his first law that all motion is perpetual until acted on by an external force?
The second law forbids perpetual motion.
- Posts: 279 | Joined: 29-November 11
Reply
#27 17 March 2012 - 03:42 PM
Reference to thread removed.
According to me,real Gravity engines are possible,but Perpectual engines are Impossible .You can't go against law of thermodynamics.You cannot make energy from nothing.
The only ways to use gravity as fuel are1) using proper force distribution technique with Impulsive energy component of gravity2)weight shifting intelligently with proper force distribution.3) mix of both.
Note that there are only few real gravity engine inventors,there are thousands of cheaters on Internet and idiots trying to make PMM.
For more information,please visit my Facebook page,https://www.facebook...magneticengines
Thanks!
Disclaimer:I am following forum rules strictly,so want to suggest that visiting my forum is only a suggestion,not advertisement.
According to me,real Gravity engines are possible,but Perpectual engines are Impossible .You can't go against law of thermodynamics.You cannot make energy from nothing.
The only ways to use gravity as fuel are1) using proper force distribution technique with Impulsive energy component of gravity2)weight shifting intelligently with proper force distribution.3) mix of both.
Note that there are only few real gravity engine inventors,there are thousands of cheaters on Internet and idiots trying to make PMM.
For more information,please visit my Facebook page,https://www.facebook...magneticengines
Thanks!
Disclaimer:I am following forum rules strictly,so want to suggest that visiting my forum is only a suggestion,not advertisement.
This post has been edited by Aman shah: 17 March 2012 - 05:08 PM
Reason for edit: Thread advertisement removed.
- Posts: 68 | Joined: 30-November 11
Reply
#28 17 March 2012 - 04:29 PM
!
Moderator Note
Sure, except for these bits:
Quote
Stay on topic. Posts should be relevant to the discussion at hand. This means that you shouldn't use scientific threads to advertise your own personal theory, or post only to incite a hostile argument.
And
Quote
Advertising and spam is prohibited. We don't mind if you put a link to your noncommercial site (e.g. a blog) in your signature and/or profile, but don't go around making threads to advertise it. Links in posts should be relevant to the discussion. Users advertising commercial sites will be banned.
That extends to your own threads.
Aman shah, please familiarise yourself with our forum rules. If you are unsure of something, you are welcome to contact staff for clarification. The trial and error method of figuring out what's allowed and what is not will get you suspended.
- Posts: 1,078 | Joined: 09-January 11
Reply

Help
Sign In »
Register Now!













