ok i will answer you all im not quite good in engkish so i may not understand alot of what you say , i will post the file content and delet links in it :

the machine doesnt go against the second law , a carriage will go down with initial speed of 63 m/s then by time it will make more speed by gravity force , in the same time the magnet will cut the coils under it , i cant see any thing goes agajns physics laws and i stated before that energy gain doesnt come from carriage motion because its energy is limited and supplied by us , it equals 2800 wat we litbit we slow it down , but magnetic field lines of magnets on the eay will cut the coils at speed of 63 m/s and generates energy .

the file :

resource list for youtube and facebook :

a new renewable energy technilogy coppyrighted ( 23.8 giga wat 238 M$ )

i have a new coppyrighted technilogy of energy generation 

details : 

cost : 238 millions $ .

power output : 23.8 giga watt .

capacity : 17 millions homes and 95 millions people .

type : renewable and clean .

size : 630 m * 63 m

technilogy : new tech detailed bellow :

Introduction

This new technology produces abundant, clean, renewable energy that lasts all day. It is inexpensive, easy to implement, and practical. The technology utilizes a new technique to generate very high energy. Blocks representing the generator are raised to a certain height, consuming minimal energy in a short time. These blocks, once raised, travel down a long, inclined line, which may take a considerable amount of time to reach the bottom. During this time, energy is generated through induction. Each block, representing a magnet mounted on a car, passes under a coil fixed to the track and then under other coils until the end of the long track. The cars are connected to each other like a train, with 63 cars per train. The train controls its speed when descending and ascending the track. At the end of the track, the path inclines to the beginning of an opposite track with the same configuration. The trains ascend from a point directly opposite the second track at the end of the inclined path, which begins at the end of the first track. At the end of the inclined path, a straight track ascends at a 63-degree angle to the beginning of the second, opposite track, which has the same configuration as the first. The train then rotates between the two tracks. It generates energy continuously, producing a very high output of 23.8 gigawatts for $95 million in construction costs. Depending on the energy harvesting technology, this cost can be reduced to $63 million for 63 gigawatts. This energy is produced continuously throughout the day, and the project can be built in a short time, perhaps no more than 63 days, at this cost. This clean, high-energy technology could potentially achieve net-zero emissions in just 63 days. This project is compact, with a length of 630 meters for the small generator, which has a capacity of 23.8 gigawatts and boasts an aesthetically pleasing design.

Technology Explanation

A Brief Introduction to the System

The generator, a magnet mounted on a wheel weighing 63 kg, is lifted to a height of 6.3 m and consumes 3200 watts of power in a short time. This magnet then moves down an inclined slope of 630 m or (6.3 km) at an initial speed of 6.3 m/s, reaching a speed of 63 m/s. This speed can be increased on longer tracks to generate more power. At this speed, the wheel will take a long time to reach the end of the track. The car carrying the magnet then descends the inclined track, passing under coils spaced apart along the length of the track. Each time the magnet passes under a coil, it generates electrical energy through induction, producing very high power. A group of cars is connected to this car to form a train. Each train consists of 63 cars connected to a leading car that controls the flow. The train moves in a regular pattern, generating electricity as it travels downhill. At the end of the track, it ascends to an opposite track, which is identical in structure but runs in the opposite direction. The end of the first track marks the beginning of the second, where the train ascends again to the second track. Conversely, the first track begins at the end of the second. The process is repeated continuously, with multiple trains connected along the long track to generate continuous power. Each inclined track contains 63 parallel lanes. The total power generated by the two tracks and their 63 lanes is 2.38 gigawatts (GW) on the shorter track, which is 6.3 meters high and 630 meters long, operating at a speed of 6.3 meters per second. Increasing the speed tenfold (the initial speed) generates ten times the power, resulting in 23.8 GW. Further lengthening the track produces 63 GW.

Detailed Explanation of the Technology:

 A 63 kg mass, represented by a magnet mounted on a car, is lifted to a height of 6.3 meters, consuming 3200 watts of power.

This power is used for each car involved in lifting the mass. The car is accelerated from an initial speed of 6.3 meters per second to 63 meters per second. The speeds depend on the system's length and stability, potentially reaching 630 meters per second or 6300 meters per second. These are advanced figures requiring sophisticated systems and control mechanisms to manage the movement and generate very high power. The magnet consists of a magnetic disk mounted on a carriage with a diameter of 28 cm. The number of turns of the coil carried above the magnet on the track is 63, and the carriage speed is 6.3 m/s. The following calculations determine the electrical energy produced by the magnet's movement near the coil and the coils carried on the track.:

v = dB/dt × N × A

N = 63 turns

r = 28 cm radius of turns

carriage speed 6.3 m/s

B = 1.26

Then, using the above equation, v is about 238 V

If the current was 63, then the power is

p = IV

p is about 15.4 kW from each coil.

Note The power is 15.4 kW, and the total power is represented by the power of the cars that fill the track. The number of cars is equal to the number of turns on the track. Since each track contains 63 turns, the total power resulting from two parallel and symmetrical tracks is:

Total power is: p = p of each coil number of coils 63 * number of systems.

p = 15400 1260 63 * 2

p is about 2.38 gigawatts

Note that the power reaches 2.38 gigawatts for the simple system. This power is increased by increasing the path length by five times or so and increasing the speed by ten times. A slightly longer and faster system produces approximately 63 gigawatts of power. The power output increases with increasing speed:

at dB/dt ten times faster, v is ten times more, and then the power is:

p is about 23.8 gigawatts.

This energy is enough for 17 million homes and a city of 95 million people.

Regarding the system cost, it is calculated as follows: When the number of turns is 63 per coil, and the total number of turns is fixed in the overall system, the length of each coil is less than one meter with a radius of 28 centimeters, and its weight is 0.1 kg of copper for a 63-amp current wire of 10 AWG gauge. If the price of one kilogram of copper is approximately $10, and adding the cost of magnets (which are certainly cheaper for construction), and then the cost of steam-powered generators (the cost of generators to produce one gigawatt of power is $10 million, as generating 400 megawatts costs $3 million, while generators producing 1 gigawatt reach $10 million), then the final cost for a small system, represented by a height of 6.3 meters and a length of 630 meters for two parallel systems, with a production capacity of 23.8 gigawatts, is calculated as follows: Cost = Number of turns Number of coils Number of parallel ways * Number of systems + Extra number for magnets + Cost of steam generators.

cost is = 63*1260*63*2*0.1 + 10,000,000.

cost is about $1.54 millions cost of coils with $89 millions cost of generators to generate 23.8 giga wat

Total cost is about $95 million to generate 23.8 gigawatt enough for 17 million homes and 95 million people

but when generators are removed and another way used to take energy directly from system then cost will be 1.54 million dollars for coils only with extra cost to magnets.

We observed that the cost ranges from $95 million to $154 million to produce 23.8 GW to 63 GW of power. This cost can be reduced by using different energy extraction technologies. Eliminating steam generators can lower the cost to $1.54 million or less, while still producing very high power. Speed control and generator movement can also be controlled. A faster system can produce very high power. When trains are regulated to be equidistant from each other along a specific track, and the output power from each coil is equal, the coils can be connected in parallel, allowing for direct power generation. This eliminates the need for steam generators, reducing the cost to $1.54 million per 23.8 GW. There are many ways to extract power from the generator, including using a control system to keep the carriages or trains relatively close together. This will produce power at a single voltage. All the coils can be connected in parallel to transmit power directly to the consumer. However, at high frequencies, the consumer installs a capacitor and a switch to convert the high frequencies to DC power stored in the capacitor. The switch then converts the DC power to alternating current (AC). This system reduces the generator cost to less than $10 million. Energy can also be stored from each coil on two capacitors. One capacitor is charged, and when it is full, it charges another. Other capacitors connected to separate coils are also charged. These capacitors, charged with different energies, are distributed equally by being connected in parallel. When the capacitors have the same energies, a switch takes the energy from them, converting the DC power from the parallel capacitors to AC power, which is then transmitted to the consumer. The same process applies to other capacitors that charge from the coils. This is another way to extract power from the generator. The coils can also be connected in series, reducing the number of turns and increasing the diameter of each wire. This allows the system to have a single source or multiple sources with a specific voltage and high current. Absolutely... As you can see, there are many ways to extract energy, such as using a capacitor, a central heating system, and a steam generator. Alternatively, the trains can be synchronized to produce equal power from all the coils. The coils are then connected together and the power is transferred directly to the user.

It's worth noting that the first train in this system can be used as a train pulling magnet-carrying wheels. It's equipped with a motor and an external power source, similar to an electric train. It's also equipped with a control system to maintain a constant speed and a uniform distance between the trains. These control systems can be quite simple, relying on an inexpensive electrical sensor and a switch to control the electric motor. The switch itself might cost no more than a dollar, making the control system very simple and inexpensive.

Theoretically, a track could be built 63 meters high and very long, extending around the Earth and returning to its starting point. The train would then ascend back to the beginning of the track, and when traveling at high speed, it would generate a very high amount of energy, repeating the process. While theoretically possible, practically, friction and other factors must be considered when using such long lengths at very low heights. Theoretically, at a height approaching zero, an object could be accelerated to a speed of 63 meters per second and travel for a time approaching infinity along a track of similarly infinity length. While theoretically possible, practically, friction between the object and the track, as well as other factors that might limit the maximum speed at which continuous motion can be produced, must be taken into account. An object floating on a magnetic field, a vacuum way, and other such systems could be used to produce motion at great lengths and low heights, accelerating to any speed. However, these systems are more complex. not impossible to achieve.

This system can also be used as a means of transportation between cities, consuming little energy by using a relatively low elevation and a relatively long inclined track. This system can be repeated multiple times along the track. For example, at a height of 63 meters and a length of 6.3 km to 63 km, this system can be repeated ten times. A certain amount of energy is expended, representing the car and passengers, to lift them to a height of 63 meters ten times, transporting them a distance of 63 km ten times, or 630 km, with relatively little energy consumption compared to the track length. This technology is for generating and amplifying energy, and it is the first energy amplification technology in the world in this way. It consumes relatively low energy, which can reach up to 3200 watts, while producing very high energy over a very long period. The amplification system and its amplification factor are controlled by increasing the track length and increasing the initial speed. The energy produced in terms of time is greater if the track length is 10 times or 100 times longer. From the initial path and the resulting energy can be increased 10 to 100 to 1000 times by increasing the speed 10 to 100 to 1000 times more. Thus, this is a system for amplifying energy and a system for producing clean, continuous electrical energy.

It's worth noting that the first train in this series can be used as a locomotive, pulling magnet-bearing wheels. It's equipped with a motor and an external power source, similar to an electric train, and is fitted with a control system to maintain a constant speed and a uniform distance between trains. These control systems are often simple, relying on an inexpensive electrical sensor and a switch to control the electric motor. The switch itself might cost no more than a dollar, making the control system very simple and cost-effective.

The energy output can be increased 10 to 100 to 1000 times by increasing the speed by a factor of 10 to 1000. It can be noted that elevators can be replaced by an inclined track at the beginning of the path that rises at an angle of 63 degrees, where a relatively long distance is left at the end of the path and this path is inclined in an arc, where this arc ends at a distance before the beginning of the second opposite path, and at a certain point it rises at an angle of 63 degrees so that the straight ascending path ends at the beginning of the second path. The same shape is left at a relatively long distance after the end of the second path, through which the path is inclined in an arc that ends at a point that is behind the beginning of the first path, and from that point the path rises in a straight line at an angle of 63 degrees to the beginning of the first path. In this case, the train has moved from the first path and finished the first path and turned. Then the train does not have to turn at a sharp angle which may hinder its movement due to its instability, and it moves in a smooth way without any hindrance that affects its stability in movement and affects energy production.

3 hours ago, newman.orion said:

the machine doesnt go against the second law

That's all I needed to hear you say, making this whole thread pointless.

"The Second Law of Thermodynamics states that the total disorder (entropy) of an isolated system always increases over time, meaning energy naturally disperses and becomes less useful."

So, since some of the energy becomes useless, your system has to draw energy from external sources just to break even, or as you claim, to produce an excess of energy.
You have made two contradicting claims, that you're not violating Thermodynamic laws, and that your closed system produces free energy; one of the claims has to be false.

If you would like assistance finding the 'leak' that is introducing external energy into your system, I suggest you start a new thread, and ask nicely, because the rest of us know which of your two claims cannot be falsified.

On 12/21/2025 at 4:02 PM, newman.orion said:

ok i will answer you all im not quite good in engkish so i may not understand alot of what you say , i will post the file content and delet links in it :

I didn't see an answer to my very simple question.

Is your machine silent ?

hello , i will use a tilt of 63° for magnet while its on carriage i forgitb to tell you , coil is same , distance 20 cm between magmet and coil , coil will make 28 kw in 100 sec energy requred from carriage is 5.3 kw to lift and sccelerate in 1 s , while magnet converges to coil it will be repelled then we get spred forward , when we pass circuit cuts and no atraction period , extra rnergy from acceleration wiol transpirt to electrisity and maintain the 6.3 m/s . this is regardless uf its silent or not .

Edited December 28, 2025Dec 28 by newman.orion

On 12/21/2025 at 2:45 PM, exchemist said:

Actually, I and others went to considerable lengths to identify exactly where, in the operating cycle of that machine, the balancing input work was required , even though we also told you that we knew in advance, just from the laws of thermodynamics, it would not produce any net energy gain.

And of course we were right.

Yes, I do remember you did step beyond the 2nd law, Exchemist, and did discuss the mechanism. That was constructive and helpful and was what I was hoping for in submitting the idea to the forum. I respected you for that and still do. It would have been more fair of me to have been less sweeping in my dismissal of the general dismissal I was greeted with.

It is the hallmark of false claims that the claimant ignores or fails to answer simple polite questions such as my question

Is your machine silent in operation ?

You are using relative movement between a magnet and coils to generate electricity. This is the principle that is used in normal electrical generators. According to your calculations you are generating more than enough power to lift the moving part to the top of the slope and release it thus creating a perpetual motion machine. Not only that, you feel there will be a surplus of power that can be used for other purposes. You also seem to think that nobody has thought of this before. Well, many years ago when I was a young radar technician someone came up to me to see what I thought of a wonderful idea he had. The idea was to make an electrically driven car that was driven by a battery. The battery was to be charged by a generator driven by the spinning of the wheels. He could therefore travel the world for nothing. I don't think I really convinced him that it would not work and I suspect that you will not be convinced that your idea will not produce the result that you want.

infact i dont assume or think my machine will work , also im trying to answer you all , i adduced my proof and the exact mechanichisim for how machine works from start until end , please if you say my machine doesnt eork then give me where your law is voilated in the machine ,i said i will lift a carriage of 63 kg , and accelerate it to 6.3 m/s , then send it down an incline its height 6.3 its length 630 , and magnet is 63° tilted same as coil backwards direction , and when magnet approaches to the coil wich is 20 cm distance from magnet it will make opposite magnetic field this magnetic foeld due to angke will push carriage forward , when !agnet leaves coil circuit of coil cutts off then no atraction period , in this way energy output from coils will be 126 kw and from carriage that will turn extra speed to energy and maintain the 6.3 m/s 53 kw both for 126 sec, where as enerhy consumed was only 5.3 kw for 1.26 sec , please show me where the issue is , its working and you can analyse it using given info , i agree with energy laws in dynamics but you must agree that in science there are a proof for all things to exist , we can have snow in desrt and we can have fire in snow land , a proof a machine ...

Edited December 29, 2025Dec 29 by newman.orion

Still no sign of an answer to my question.

yes because of sack of air under magnet

Ok, I'll try to point out a few facts that may help you see the problems in your analysis. Firstly there is no difference in the basic principles of an electric motor and an electric generator. both rely on interaction between a magnetic field, electric current and movement. Fleming's left and right hand rules show the relationship between magnetic field, electric current and movement So one turns movement into electrical power and the other turns electrical power into movement. Now, in both cases the work done by the output will be less than the work done at the input. (efficiency will be less than 100%). For example if you are turning the shaft of a standard generator it will be easy if the output is not being used, but will become harder to turn if you use the out put to do work for you. i.e it will resist the movement. Thus there is no way you can position a coil that can accelerate your carriage. If an e.m.f. is created in the coil that causes current to flow it will slow down your carriage. Indeed If somehow the current could exceed a level that raised efficiency above 100% it would stop your carriage and become a motor that would push it back up the slope. Another way of explaining this is a term known as back e.m.f. I'll leave you to look that up!

in fact i agree with you but the generator will not stop my magnet because at repelling the magnet is parallel to coil and magnet is 63° with carriage , so force is most of it going forward , and no atraction because coil is open citrcuit at departure period , thus we have energybgenerated and extra energy for speed gain , my question is give me physics law to make my machine working below 1/1 gain or energy output less than input , i coppyrighted it and i dont know where issue is , please if you know laws and at least force and electric laws then show me that my carriage in the end will generate less than 100% energy of input energy , analyse force of coil due to magnet at speed of 6.3 m/s and find coil energy output and if its force will add any energy to carriage when magnet is 63° from zero degree at right start count going up by your circle when 180 is at leftmost , so magnet face will be aback and coil parallel , so force will go forward if you analyse and carriage will gain large energy from coil , you need to analyse the system you have the full information , coil inner radius is 6.3 cm outer 18 cm and wire is 0.5 cm diameter its kength is 10 cm , coil is parallel to magnet and 20 cm away magnet is 63° on carriage carriage is on incline of 630 m length 6.3 m height , speed is constant 6.3 m/s extra energy totally turned to energy , maxumum current in coil is 63 amp magnet is 63 kg and 3 T , extra energy is from gravity acceleration , not less than lift energy , continuty energy at end of path not less than acceleration energy , what information you need , all info are with you just use a pen and send me the comment thats for every onw here , give me numbers they are the good speaker that people cant say any thing after them .

6 hours ago, studiot said:

Still no sign of an answer to my question.

what is meaning of silent , you mean energy waste in vibration , the machine can be supported with vibration absorber , and besides that the carriage will go down any way if no force to stop it and only extra force cimes from coil and that force is totally acting on !agnet when the latter is 63° with carriage so most of this force go forward and cause the carriage to accelerate , i will in futurr make a new post showing every thing for all who ask .

you seem to think that your generator will be more than 100% efficient. That would allow you to construct a perpetual motion machine. To save me wasting more time why don't you google "why can't a generator power itself".

BTW you have already been told the law that forbids a machine being more than 100% efficient.

i cant tell you more than proof , my generator doesnt genrate more than input but it generate more energy than input by how it works not by what it takes

I think I'll stop banging my head on the wall. I look forward to the time the whole world runs on free electricity

Edited December 29, 2025Dec 29 by OldTony

On 12/20/2025 at 1:52 PM, Actom.growth said:

energy required is 2800 wat in 1 sec to lift 63 kg weight to 6.3 m .

2800 watt for 1 sec is 2800 joules

PE = mgh = 63 kg x 6.3m x 9.81 m/s^2 is 3890 joules

Further if this is at constant speed of 6.3 m/s, the KE is an additional 1250 joules, but the exact number depennds on how it’s done (and some of this could be recovered)

So right from the start your math is wrong.

There is no doubt that properly done, it will show that output does not exceed input, and there will be losses.

off corse numbers arent accurate , but the point you didnt get , is tge tech , why will i have more energy than input , because the body will complete the journy and generate the energy and no force will stop it besides the extra gain of energy for acceleration :

1- energy from induction at 6.3 speed .

2- energy from acceleration .

tge two above will be greater than input because input wont exceed 5.3 kw in 1.26 sec and output because of perpetuality to move will be greater in 126 seconds , clear , show your mathmatical proof by two numbers inputvenergy and output energy and time for each or energy of bith at same time what is the value ? if you did i will say they are right and im in need of solving my issue if i was clise following right steos to there or accept the general reality and if the numbers are greater on output then you need to say he is right and lets use this tech today and save globe and stop poverty , cold and heat of weather for all people yoday that dont have energy to live properly in very hard weather .

please give the simple two numbers or you are who mskes the arguement long not me .

4 hours ago, newman.orion said:

off corse numbers arent accurate , but the point you didnt get , is tge tech , why will i have more energy than input

How can you claim this without accurate calculations?

If your first numbers aren’t correct, why should I have any reason to think subsequent calculations are?

its ok not to be accurate if the aim is about something else like let resistors be 9 ohm 10 ohm for transistir when i takk about gain of 63 times i can say not accurate results but my machine amplifies wnergy this iscp what matters , please find the inout output energy across certain time for each no matter accuracy just is gain 63 times or less than one , if you made 53 gain its ok and if you made 0.7 gain its ok too , please give ne simple twi numbers , output and input . im an engineer not great about physics .

5 hours ago, newman.orion said:

its ok not to be accurate if the aim is about something else like let resistors be 9 ohm 10 ohm for transistir when i takk about gain of 63 times i can say not accurate results but my machine amplifies wnergy this iscp what matters , please find the inout output energy across certain time for each no matter accuracy just is gain 63 times or less than one , if you made 53 gain its ok and if you made 0.7 gain its ok too , please give ne simple twi numbers , output and input . im an engineer not great about physics .

It’s your proposal, so it’s up to you to work out those details. You’ve been told that you won’t get more energy out than you put in. The 2nd law of thermodynamics prevents it. You’re free to ask about the physics involved in the various steps.

But if all you have is insisting that it works without any legitimate argument, then this doesn’t fulfill the requirements for discussion in speculations

I love perpetual devices! They always appear on forums and/or on the Internet.. and only in this aspect they are perpetual..

Perpetuum Mobile - Penguin Cafe Orchestra

ok i will work on full analysis and i wish if any one has objection to show it not say by no proof im violating any law in science

So, if you 'make up' imaginary data, we can't say "No. That's impossible." ?

Lenz's law should slow down the magnet.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenz%27s_law

The video shows how much a magnet can be slowed down. The configuration is not the same, but the principle should be the same.

His ( coils? ) do not seem to have a useful output either. One video shows ( plasma?) coming out of the center of it.