Jump to content

How do scientists explain RF waves traveling, without a medium?


Capiert

Recommended Posts

On 2/18/2024 at 9:26 PM, Capiert said:

The devil is in the detail(s).

Michelson was biased and you are biased too. Other people responding here are also biased because they now take what they learned from books as dogma. Not many have equipment at home to perform experiments by themselves. It's hard to get past dogma, or even imagine that you can get past dogma. That's why the best results (discoveries) come from young students who have nothing to lose in the scientific world. Once someone gets a reputable name, it is very difficult to enter a controversial topic and potentially lose all respect.

If you bought the required equipment and started doing physical experiments, the conversation with you would be much more fruitful. It is not very expensive. An investment of a few hundred to a few thousand dollars. Much less than the time spent on the discussion.

Edited by Sensei
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/16/2024 at 11:51 PM, exchemist said:
On 2/16/2024 at 10:31 PM, Sensei said:

Philosophy is a pseudoscience. Physics is a real science.

Philosophy is not a pseudoscience.

Yep. Philosophy is not even science. It is reflection on how we think, being it on the subject of politics, ethics, or ... science. See my disclaimer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Eise phileo + sophia = love of wisdom, in the distant past, with modern redefinition of this word, it is very hard to agree with it..

Many old, good-looking words have been redefined in such a way that they no longer have the same meaning as they did two or three thousands years ago..

ps. The marketing staff is even better at disgusting people for certain words.. ;)

 

Edited by Sensei
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Sensei said:

Many old, good-looking words have been redefined in such a way that they no longer have the same meaning as they did two or three thousands years ago..

Yes. And? If you want to stick to old fashioned meanings then physics is philosophy. Newtons 'Principia' is clearly a work of philosophy: it is even in the complete title. 

So. Can we just look what is done under the header of 'philosophy' in academia today? 

Or maybe I do not even understand what you are trying to say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Sensei said:

@Eise phileo + sophia = love of wisdom, in the distant past, with modern redefinition of this word, it is very hard to agree with it..

Many old, good-looking words have been redefined in such a way that they no longer have the same meaning as they did two or three thousands years ago..

ps. The marketing staff is even better at disgusting people for certain words.. ;)

 

When are you going to give up on this crusade of yours?

Philosophy is not evil, jeez. 🙄

Edited by dimreepr
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.