Jump to content

What is a Scientific Model ?


studiot

Recommended Posts

A very popular phrase in this website is in the words of Dr Swanson.

Quote

You don’t have a model.

Another member's longer description of a model is also quoted here

Quote

A scientific model is the representation of a phenomenon, rather than a verbal explanation. You could use visual models like charts, or a computer simulation, for example. Building a physical model is difficult at the levels you're discussing, but that's another example of a model. Using maths to represent how the phenomenon is calculated is the perfect tool at the quantum level. Without any of these, you don't have a model.

 

The purpose of this thread is to arrive at a robust definition/description of a scientific model by discussion.

Perhaps a summary could then be pinned for future reference as the same issues come up time and time again.

 

To kick off I note that using just model by itself can be unhelpfully vague and there are many descriptors/qualifiers available.

Models can be ( in no partuicular order) qualitative; quantitative; illustrative; comparative; graphical; analogue; digital; expressed by a process; expressed by a formula and so on.

Since no model completely describes the subject, additional information is needed about the actual qualities described and any limitations imposed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, studiot said:

Models can be ( in no partuicular order) qualitative; quantitative; illustrative; comparative; graphical; analogue; digital; expressed by a process; expressed by a formula and so on.

Models accurately explain current behavior and make testable predictions about future behaviors observed in specific circumstances. It's not enough to say that X or Y will change, but instead must be able to forecast the outcome as Z.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, iNow said:

Models accurately explain current behavior and make testable predictions about future behaviors observed in specific circumstances. It's not enough to say that X or Y will change, but instead must be able to forecast the outcome as Z.

This is all true, but this also describes what a theory is doing. Models need to represent a phenomenon, to show what the explanation is talking about. They should provide a valid approximation of the behavior as a perspective on the phenomenon. Like Eddington using spherical cows to illustrate a particular aspect or insight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, iNow said:

Models accurately explain current behavior and make testable predictions about future behaviors observed in specific circumstances. It's not enough to say that X or Y will change, but instead must be able to forecast the outcome as Z.

What about Newton's 3rd Law ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This physics professor describes his hierarchy of Framework >> Theory >> Model. Theory is a framework applied to a specific context, model is a theory with external parameters plugged in. Might be useful for this discussion. See the lecture between 14 and 22 minutes: 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A scientific model, to me, is an abstract construction, usually mathematical, that describes relationships between phenomena and objects. Models don't attempt to describe the total phenomenology, but some specific aspect of them.

Edited by StringJunky
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, iNow said:

What about it? It clearly describes outcome Z, even if imprecisely. 

So you consider N3 as a model ?

I rather read a greater requirement into your original answer.

Below are two models.

Do either model N3 in your opinion ?

 

1 hour ago, StringJunky said:

A scientific model, to me, is an abstract construction, usually mathematical, that describes relationships between phenomena and objects. Models don't attempt to describe the total phenomenology, but some specific aspect of them.

How about models A and B below ?

Do they meet your standards ?

models1.jpg.0f63b67e6089ab292abb5b76238e0b20.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, studiot said:

So you consider N3 as a model ?

I rather read a greater requirement into your original answer.

Below are two models.

Do either model N3 in your opinion ?

 

How about models A and B below ?

Do they meet your standards ?

models1.jpg.0f63b67e6089ab292abb5b76238e0b20.jpg

 

Yes, it's a schematic model description of something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.