Moontanman Posted January 1, 2019 Share Posted January 1, 2019 If a planetary body about the size and mass of Ceres were to be captured by the Earth could it take up a stable orbit around the Earth? How difficult would the interactions be for the Earth Moon system to capture such a body? Also would such a capture take several years of interactions between the Earth, the Moon and the new body or would it be more of an immediate thing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beecee Posted January 7, 2019 Share Posted January 7, 2019 (edited) On 1/2/2019 at 5:35 AM, Moontanman said: If a planetary body about the size and mass of Ceres were to be captured by the Earth could it take up a stable orbit around the Earth? How difficult would the interactions be for the Earth Moon system to capture such a body? Also would such a capture take several years of interactions between the Earth, the Moon and the new body or would it be more of an immediate thing? Earth does have a second Moon of sorts...It's called " Cruithne " https://theconversation.com/earths-other-moon-and-its-crazy-orbit-could-reveal-mysteries-of-the-solar-system-38010 Edited January 7, 2019 by beecee 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carrock Posted January 7, 2019 Share Posted January 7, 2019 On 1/1/2019 at 6:35 PM, Moontanman said: If a planetary body about the size and mass of Ceres were to be captured by the Earth could it take up a stable orbit around the Earth? How difficult would the interactions be for the Earth Moon system to capture such a body? Also would such a capture take several years of interactions between the Earth, the Moon and the new body or would it be more of an immediate thing? Fun thought experiment. I think a single interaction would work... Assume the body has little more K.E. than consistent with escape velocity from earth. Heading earthwardish, it passes ahead of the moon a little beyond Roche's limit, giving the moon some of its K.E. w.r.t. earth, enough that it is now in earth orbit. Assuming the moon doesn't now have escape velocity, it will have an elliptical orbit with a perigee near its old orbital distance. The body will similarly have an apogee near the moon's old orbital distance. A few near misses would cause increasingly interesting orbits. It's possible that they would acquire non intersecting orbits. Then just wait a few million years for tidal forces etc to circularise their orbits. Tides on earth would be very interesting, but maybe not in a good way. Unless one of these objects (re)acquires escape velocity or their orbits become non intersecting, I'd expect them to collide within a few years/decades and possibly coalesce eventually into one moon. The meteor shower on earth would be terminally spectacular. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nod2003 Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 With regards to tides on earth from a Ceres capture, as Ceres is only about 1% the mass of the moon, unless the orbital distance was significantly closer then the moon currently gets, wouldn’t the effects be essentially unnoticeable to the general public? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carrock Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 44 minutes ago, Nod2003 said: With regards to tides on earth from a Ceres capture, as Ceres is only about 1% the mass of the moon, unless the orbital distance was significantly closer then the moon currently gets, wouldn’t the effects be essentially unnoticeable to the general public? To the ignorant subset of the general public, yes. I'd assumed Ceres' mass was not much smaller than the moon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nod2003 Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 Well a 1% difference in a 5’ tide would be +/- 0.6”, which would be measurable certainly, but not visibly obvious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moontanman Posted January 28, 2019 Author Share Posted January 28, 2019 (edited) I was hoping for a stable orbit inside Earth's moon, any chance of that? Maybe a resonance orbit? Edited January 28, 2019 by Moontanman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dimreepr Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 On 1/1/2019 at 6:35 PM, Moontanman said: If a planetary body about the size and mass of Ceres were to be captured by the Earth could it take up a stable orbit around the Earth? How difficult would interactions be for the Earth Moon system to capture such a body? Also would such a capture take several years of interactions between the Earth, the Moon and the new body or would it be more of an immediate thing? 3 time will tell 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carrock Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 (edited) 40 minutes ago, Nod2003 said: Well a 1% difference in a 5’ tide would be +/- 0.6”, which would be measurable certainly, but not visibly obvious. A 1% difference in a 5’ tide would be +/- 0.6” or a 1% difference in a 50’ tide would be +/- 6” If by 'unnoticeable,' you mean not measured, then many people have never noticed any tide. Only an ignorant subset of the general public are unaware tides exist or would be completely unaware of Ceres' tidal effects. 24 minutes ago, Moontanman said: I was hoping for a stable orbit inside Earth's moon, any chance of that? Maybe a resonance orbit? Eventually tidal forces over millions of years might stabilise the orbit inside the lunar orbit. I can't think of anything faster. Speculation: I suspect that as the moon/earth mass ratio is the highest of any satellite/planet in the solar system, the likeliest, perhaps inevitable, outcome is that Ceres would collide with earth or moon within a few centuries. (Or orbital mechanics would become an applied science.) Edited January 28, 2019 by Carrock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nod2003 Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 5’=60” 60”*.01= 0.6” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carrock Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 1 minute ago, Nod2003 said: 5’=60” 60”*.01= 0.6” Oops... You responded to a couple of typos before I corrected them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saurabh Gupta Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 As I study and research done on many websites and places, I haven't found any article related to the "Could the Earth have two moons?". The details about moons and other satellites has been listed on the following links. These are very beneficial so if you really want to clear your doubt then must go through the following links. https://earthsky.org/space/does-earth-have-a-second-moon https://www.universetoday.com/92148/what-if-the-earth-had-two-moons/ https://blog.nationalgeographic.org/2009/01/16/could-earth-have-two-moons/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Notional Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 On 1/7/2019 at 12:44 AM, beecee said: Earth does have a second Moon of sorts...It's called " Cruithne " https://theconversation.com/earths-other-moon-and-its-crazy-orbit-could-reveal-mysteries-of-the-solar-system-38010 https://www.businessinsider.com/cruithne-is-not-earths-second-moon-2015-3 Not that Business Insider is a scientific authority, but I want to see how you respond. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now