Can psychotropic drugs (ie: THC) alter perceptual saliency of informations? Is it possible to experimentally induce mental thoughts amplification through altered states of consciousness?

THC alters perception.

 

What do you mean by thought amplification? probably not.

Regulation of neural synchronicity by calcium-dependent dopaminergic pathways may enhance optimal

computation of saliency and creativity (aka mental thoughts amplification) .

Edited December 29, 20168 yr by tkadm30

Quantum-like collapse of the wavefunction via phasic dopaminergic signaling:

 

Mental thoughts amplification is the subconscious process of directing the subliminal creativity to enhance mental saliency

through fine-tuned dopaminergic signaling.

Edited December 31, 20168 yr by tkadm30

Esoteric concatenation of inchoate terminology in an effusive exposition of lexical cornucopia with the innate intentionated goal of perspicacious deliberation is, perhaps, a malfeasance too far.

You have deep perceptional-cognitive abnormalities or profound misinterpretations on the usage of technical language in a science forum.

You have deep perceptional-cognitive abnormalities or profound misinterpretations on the usage of technical language in a science forum.

For the benefit of those of us with such abnormalities, could you please explain what on God's earth you think you are on about.

Otherwise we will continue to believe that your posts are just word salad.

Quantum-like collapse of the wavefunction via phasic dopaminergic signaling:

 

 

Please provide evidence that such a thing occurs.

 

 

 

Mental thoughts amplification is the subconscious process of directing the subliminal creativity to enhance mental saliency

through fine-tuned dopaminergic signaling.

 

Please provide evidence to support this claim.

Increased cerebral blood flow activity promote creativity and saliency. I argue that mental thoughts amplification can be enhanced by upregulating neuronal phase coherence and "fine-tuning" dopamine receptor density via pharmacological activation of the subconscious system.

I argue that mental thoughts amplification can be enhanced by upregulating neuronal phase coherence and "fine-tuning" dopamine receptor density via pharmacological activation of the subconscious system.

 

 

Please provide evidence to support this claim.

Mental thoughts amplification is dependent on neuronal phase coherence and retrograde signaling: THC-mediated pharmacological activation of CB1 receptors may enhance dopaminergic signaling and increase perceptual saliency. Neuronal phase coherence (NPC) is poorly understood. The frontal lobe is implicated in learning and acquisition of new informations. The role of the frontal lobe processing of dopamine exocytosis is unclear. I propose that neuronal phase coherence is a functional evidence that interneuronal computation is sensible to exocytosis.

Mental thoughts amplification is dependent on neuronal phase coherence and retrograde signaling: THC-mediated pharmacological activation of CB1 receptors may enhance dopaminergic signaling and increase perceptual saliency. Neuronal phase coherence (NPC) is poorly understood. The frontal lobe is implicated in learning and acquisition of new informations. The role of the frontal lobe processing of dopamine exocytosis is unclear. I propose that neuronal phase coherence is a functional evidence that interneuronal computation is sensible to exocytosis.

 

 

Please provide evidence to support this claim.

Neuronal phase coherence and synchronicity:

 

Evidences of synaptic hypercomputation as a novel neurocomputational model to access the subconscious system through the neuromodulation of exocytosis?

Neuronal phase coherence and synchronicity:

 

Evidences of synaptic hypercomputation as a novel neurocomputational model to access the subconscious system through the neuromodulation of exocytosis?

You do realise word salad and evidence are two different concepts?

You do realise to ignore scientific progress on the (high) probality of your negative emotionality toward the use of appropriate technical language on a science forum?

Neuronal phase coherence and synchronicity:

 

Evidences of synaptic hypercomputation as a novel neurocomputational model to access the subconscious system through the neuromodulation of exocytosis?

 

 

No evidence then.

You do realise to ignore scientific progress on the (high) probality of your negative emotionality toward the use of appropriate technical language on a science forum?

 

 

As there is no such thing as hypercomputation, and therefore no such thing as synaptic hypercomputation, that cannot be "appropriate technical language.

 

It is meaningless gibberish.

 

 

As there is no such thing as hypercomputation, and therefore no such thing as synaptic hypercomputation, that cannot be "appropriate technical language.

 

It is meaningless gibberish.

 

A very spectacular claim not backed up by scientific evidences of biological hypercomputation...

 

A very spectacular claim not backed up by scientific evidences of biological hypercomputation...

 

 

Then please provide this "scientific evidences of biological hypercomputation".

 

I have asked you several times to do this. You have failed. Therefore there is no reason to think that it exists.

Observations:

1. The author of this thread finds writing grammatical English challenging.

2. This is exacerbated by the almost exclusive use of meaningless verbiage.

3. His claims appear nonsensical.

4. Requests for evidence are ignored.

5. Requests for clarification are ignored.

 

Conclusion:

Further discussion is pointless.

 

Recommendation:

Shut the fool down before he injures himself.

Agreed. I may regret this but actual research involving fMRI and other methods have found that especially high levels of THC adminsitration lead to impaired saliency processing and reduction in the ability to perform tasks. The former is also associated with psychotic symptoms.

A general limitation is that the number of studies is fairly limited and requires larger cohorts to make definite statements.

 

See for example Bhattacharyya et al. 2015 Neurophsychopharmacology or Colizzi et al 2016 Neurosci and Biobehav Rev, which discusses the potential of chronic cannabis use to disrupt glutamate synaptic plasiticity.

 

Note the lack of quantum hyper thingies in them. I will throw in a couple of free nanos, though.

For the benefit of those of us with such abnormalities, could you please explain what on God's earth you think you are on about.

Otherwise we will continue to believe that your posts are just word salad.

I presume tkadm30 doesn't know what he's on about.

The pharmacological activation of dopaminergic signaling via THC administration may trigger experimental observer-dependent access to the subsconscious mind. It is a scientific investigation on the quantum-like phase coherence in biological systems, presumely known as neural synchronicity.

I've enjoyed this thread; it is funny but sad. The word salads are funny, but the lack of understanding by the OP is sad.

Edited January 3, 20178 yr by EdEarl

My experimental research on mental thoughts amplification suggests that gamma-band neural oscillations can be modulated by synaptic (dopamine) exocytosis.

Edited January 4, 20178 yr by tkadm30

My experimental research on mental thoughts amplification suggests that gamma-band neural oscillations can be modulated by synaptic (dopamine) exocytosis.

 

!

Moderator Note

If you post another thread like this, you'll face suspension. Making things up is not appreciated here. If you have serious assertions, we need more than just your wavy hands and leafy wordy make-believe. Please research what "evidence" means.

 

Thread closed.