dimreepr

Think about it, Reg (what did the Roman's ever do for us?)...

Wait what now? If that's your excuse for logic, it's little wonder you struggle with the concept.

I'm no expert on transgenders, I think I know one (we talk but I've never asked) and she had tits; I'm pretty sure most of them want to see biological changes... But more to the point, does that mean if you could write the rules, you'd let them play?

I've had a think about what it tells me, either your X, something I can't say, cus you'd report me, or Y, you've got a spreadbet on how many page's this will get to, or XY, you're a troll.

Another diversion instead of an answer, it tells me a great deal...

Excuse after excuse to hide the reason for your objection to the perfectly workable solution of, let them play first (test for possibility of monetising and fair competition, ITO 😉). All of your replies, since I suggested that we put the brakes on this roundabout, have been nothing but spin/excuses. One last try, because you're clearly inteligent; what is the reason you object to the above solution?

OK, thanks for the explanation as regards HRT, I'll take it as read if you like (cough citation), but that aside, how can you have evidence of how well they play together, if they aren't allowed to play together? And so the wheel spins, and is never going to be resolved/halted; as long as people KNOW that it's wrong to try. Now, please answer the question/s, I know you know I meant and stop being deliberately obtuse, pretty please with knobs on ("clean the fucking car")...

Please explain. I understand your position just fine, because if it isn't that you object to them playing, before any evidence can be collected, then wtf have we been talking about in the past 80 page's?🥱 More to the point, answer the question, pretty please, any one of them, I don't mind, just once, but for the love of god/whoever not more spin... 🙏

Well, the only argument/objection you seem to have is a fundamental part of being a transsexual, namely HRT, and however you try to spin that, it's just an excuse to object. So for me it's a dead end, so I'm not going to spin again, until I see an actual reason for your basic position on this...

Well said +1 I wonder if that will be enough to bring this sad little roundabout to a halt??? 🤒

How big are you???

Well, Schrodinger's cat is designed to show the absurdity of comparing the little with the big, and you seem to be doing that, but in the antipode. I'm just pointing out that this topic is, macro, so the micro need not apply...

OK, but which part?

But this is Schrodinger's cat in reverse, it has no place in this particular conversation...

Indeed, so what's your point, in the context of this topic?

Really? It's big enough for steotypes to emerge...

It's never been a binary question, even if we take the obvious, sex for reproduction, there's 4 group's: 1, men that can, 2, women that can, 3, men that can't, 4, women that can't, 6 if we include those that choose not to partake, 8 if we include those that can't attract a mate. And that's a question of life and death, and we're only talking about a game FFS. For me, it's because you've already dismissed the language to describe it out of hand; for instance, a large part of what it is to be male/female is subjective, so you know what it feels like to be a man because you are one, so in your imagination what it feels like to be a woman is simply the opposite of that. IOW You lack the understanding, because you've dismissed the language needed as bullshit. 😉

Indeed, we will continue to grow until physics says we can't...

Is it though? Women are very bad driver's... 😲

Well, he didn't explain it very well... 😉

You've taken that out of context, like you do with all of your excuses; you've obviously missed the part where he explains why he's not being transphobic and that there will be a certain amount of irony in the following joke's... 😉

Now that's irony... 🤓 But not them??? Ye, I get it; you're irony impaired... 😲

Can you think of a reason why I shouldn't think that???

Your generalisation isn't aimed at all, it's like a punt gun pointing at a flock of people. Greed is good for example, is it only wrong in the right circumstances, or, only right in the wrong circumstances???