JustStuit

I think you have to use factorials or somethin because a fraction higher than one would imply an inevitable outcome.

The large majority of drug users seem to abuse it. Using it more than enough and subjecting other people to dangerous circumstances would be what I'm talking about - so yes, drug abuse. But once people get addicting, many can't help but abusing it. Coming from a high school, I know this first-hand. If people were able to control it and not hurt anybody else I would have no problem with it. They are wasting their lives, but I guess that's their choice..

I was agreeing with you. I should have quoted it.

I don't see why. Maybe because of the position of the atom not always being perfectly stable it would have a slight charge imbalance. But I don't see this being enough for a magnet to attract wood. Maybe some1 with knowledge of this would care to post.

all areas of the earth, threatening to send mankind into extinction by conquering gardens and lawns, insinuating that people have to **actually** weed and get off the couch, but then

I guess I'm different and it's hard to date. Life is tough.

Well, when there are more than one rows in a pencil box they would stack better. clarisse's quote - This seems like the best reason.

I was thinking that the elbow joint could swing all the way around b/c you can lick the inside of your elbow. Not that this is productive at all. I was just thinking hypothectically.

I often do this too. People either call me the dumbest smart kid they know or "ditsy". I think I'm just preoccupied. This can get annoying. I'm just a forgetful guy. Altough I memorize latin words and rules and digits of pi pretty fast. It's strange how well I can remember and learn advanced math and learn new language but can't remember where my wallet is. I have selective memory I guess.

Popular science is a lot less science and more fads/tech stuff. It's still interesting though.

I think drugs are a real problem and ignoring them is not a bright idea.

who promptly created a show with vegeatarian carnivors, which led to

That is NOT the only reason. Protecting other people is the major reason. People do things they would not when high or under influence and other people can be affected. To prevent injuries and murders seems pretty important to me.

when you add them and multiply the others

Quote from Swansont in thread http://www.scienceforums.net/forums/showthread.php?t=18008. Read through that.

It works with unpaired electrons in an atom which has charge. In wood, the atoms are neutral and have no attraction.

For one, lick their elbow

I like the donut reference. Because of this, I always get medium well hmburgers and rare steaks. Better not to take chances. mmmm....donuts

Well if drugs were legal and people weren't sent to jail, could you imagine the reprecussions? Most drugs render people with impaired judgement and not fit to interact. This would create dangerous enviroments and a lot of people too high to do anything. While in some cases drugs are needed, anything that negatively affects the brain and conciousness and is addicting should not be legal. People are ignorant, though, and we know that drugs and achohol will continue. Prohibition didn't work because, for one of many reasons, achohol was legal before and people weren't about to stop. But to make drugs legal would lead to chaos in some regions. Breaking the law should have consequences so I assume you want to make drugs legal, but think. Do you really want everyong around you high? While people use drugs now, we don't want to increase that percentage. Also, drugs can ruin lives. Between addiction and things done under the influence do you really want to subject people to less pressure against taking them? People don't always think ahead and someone has to look out for them. And if this creates jobs, then it's all the better. We need more jobs to support people, unless you want jobless high people walking around. I think you're taking the war on drugs thing the wrong way. The government is not trying to "hurt" or demean people. Are they really better off getting high? The government has to back up it's laws otherwise they will not be followed. Oh and btw, while prohibition may not have worked - it failed - it did slow down drinking. Drinking wasn't back to original levels before prohibition for 10 or 15 years, impressive concidering it probably would have increased if not for it. Legalizing drugs would not be a good thing...

You would have to network them. Windows XP will do it pretty much for you (I think) but make sure your firewalls don't block it. We had trouble because we didn't realized the firewall was blocking it.

but had all the characteristics of pickle, it was later divised he was

I wonder what chemicals in the frong induce this. Still is a type of drugs I guess.

The things you do on LSD can be dangerous

um....we love u too?

I guess that would have been a simplier explanation lol