Imagine Everything

I asked my Mrs if I was the best one she had been with. She said yes, all the others were 9's or 10's

I am posting the following wiki links as they are some of the areas I have researched a little & can hopefully offer support to this idea, as to how the SN-NNP's might fit in. I am sure there are vastly more different sites, khan academy perhaps for one, that can also offer this information, however, for uniformity's sake, I'll stick with wiki as much as possible. The wiki links are not there for click bait & I'm not asking for anyone to read them, they are merely useful ways for me to support this idea. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifold In mathematics, a manifold is a topological space that locally resembles Euclidean space near each point. More precisely, an n -dimensional manifold, or n -manifold for short, is a topological space with the property that each point has a neighborhood that is homeomorphic to an open subset of n -dimensional Euclidean space. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_charge The "color charge" of quarks and gluons is completely unrelated to the everyday meaning of color, which refers to the frequency of photons, the particles that mediate a different fundamental force, electromagnetism. The term color and the labels red, green, and blue became popular simply because of the loose but convenient analogy to the primary colors. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_wavefunction The universal wavefunction or the wavefunction of the universe is the wavefunction or quantum state of the entire universe. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy In physical cosmology and astronomy, dark energy is a proposed form of energy that affects the universe on the largest scales. Its primary effect is to drive the accelerating expansion of the universe. Assuming that the lambda-CDM model of cosmology is correct,[2] dark energy dominates the universe, contributing 68% of the total energy in the present-day observable universe while dark matter and ordinary (baryonic) matter contribute 27% and 5%, respectively, and other components such as neutrinos and photons are nearly negligible. However, it dominates the universe's mass–energy content because it is uniform across space. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter In astronomy and cosmology, dark matter is an invisible and hypothetical form of matter that does not interact with light or other electromagnetic radiation. Dark matter is implied by gravitational effects that cannot be explained by general relativity unless more matter is present than can be observed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle The superposition principle,[1] also known as superposition property, states that, for all linear systems, the net response caused by two or more stimuli is the sum of the responses that would have been caused by each stimulus individually. So that if input A produces response X, and input B produces response Y, then input (A + B) produces response (X + Y). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-slit_experiment In modern physics, the double-slit experiment demonstrates that light and matter can exhibit behavior of both classical particles and classical waves. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-slit_experiment#/media/File:Double-slit.svg The above link should take you directly to a double slit experiment diagram from the wiki on the right side of the initial page you see. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_flux & https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_tunnelling Energy flux is the rate of transfer of energy through a surface. In physics, quantum tunnelling, barrier penetration, or simply tunnelling is a quantum mechanical phenomenon in which an object such as an electron or atom passes through a potential energy barrier that, according to classical mechanics, should not be passable due to the object not having sufficient energy to pass or surmount the barrier. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency Frequency is the number of occurrences of a repeating event per unit of time.[1] Frequency is an important parameter used in science and engineering to specify the rate of oscillatory and vibratory phenomena, such as mechanical vibrations, audio signals (sound), radio waves, and light. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole A black hole is an astronomical body so dense that its gravity prevents anything from escaping, even light. Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity predicts that a sufficiently compact mass will form a black hole.[4] The boundary of no escape is called the event horizon. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation Hawking radiation would reduce the mass and rotational energy of black holes and consequently cause black hole evaporation. Because of this, black holes that do not gain mass through other means are expected to shrink and ultimately vanish. https://www.livescience.com/can-a-black-hole-explode (this isn't a wiki page) But could black holes actually have more interesting interior lives? Could they, for instance, explode? If an "explosion" is "a sudden, brief release of tremendous amounts of energy" then the answer is unequivocally yes. And the best part is that they can explode in several interesting ways, either by detonating themselves or their nearby environments. Hawking radiation, Superradiance, Disks and jets. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_function_collapse In various interpretations of quantum mechanics, wave function collapse, also called reduction of the state vector,[1] occurs when a wave function—initially in a superposition of several eigenstates—reduces to a single eigenstate due to interaction with the external world. This interaction is called an observation and is the essence of a measurement in quantum mechanics, which connects the wave function with classical observables such as position and momentum. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_field In physics, a gravitational field or gravitational acceleration field is a vector field used to explain the influences that a body extends into the space around itself. <-- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feynman_diagram https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feynman_diagram#/media/File:Feynmann_Diagram_Gluon_Radiation.svg The above link should take you directly to a feynmann diagram from the wiki on the right side of the initial page you see. There is a lot more but I won't post those unless someone tells me it's ok, I fear I may have posted too many already, sorry didn't realise just how much I had read. The idea as I originally said last year, is simple yet so very complex. There is a little bit of maths (I think) I can offer however, I doubt myself & maths will ever be friends & I have more than likely got it wrong. Still it's just an idea right now, that's all & it's still nice of you folks to have allowed it to progress this far without seeing it as a complete wag. (yes I remember that too lol, and maybe it is) And I wont pretend that I understand all the science/maths that I have read or perhaps what I will write, however, for whatever reason, I started seeing a pattern & quite literally stumbled across a possibility for this SQEP / 'thingy' / SN-NNP & it's 'journey' around March I think & more has been falling into place since. In my head anyway. I have no idea what you all might think. My descriptions & explanations might fail straight away, I don't see this idea as being anything different to anything all of you scientists & mathematicians have discovered/proven so far, I see it being an absolute part of it. Where science/maths may see decay & creation quantum activity, in this idea I see decay, creation & infusion & absorption. Where science.maths may see a wavelength collapse, I see a possibility. Where science sees an EH, this idea offers a possible way to look beyond the EH. I can visualise this SN-NNP, not directly but more as a kind of dark space, I don't know what 'almost nothing' would look like if we could see it so for me it is just a dark shadow type thing. A shadow of a shadow of a shadow... @ site admin please let me know if I have posted too many wiki links & if I can post more if I haven't. I haven't got hundreds but there are a few. It would help me a great deal if you would allow me too please. I should say, when I might say "I see it" or "I think" or similar phrases, it is only meant within the confines of this idea. If I'm honest I don't know what to think anymore, some parts of science have both baffled & enchanted me 🙂 It's ironic too, all the above information & nth more being used by me to try & describe 'almost nothing'

Water & an atmosphere perhaps? Are we as humans not also doing the same thing? Maybe we are alien to earth because https://www.space.com/37562-a-huge-asteroid-hitting-mars-4-billion-years-ago-may-have-shaped-the-red-planet.html Iirc, Mars cooled down before the earth due to it's size & may have satisfied conditions for certain life to form before it got smacked by an asteroid, sending quite a lot of asteroid/Martian fragments inwards & outwards. Perhaps our very long lost ancestors were on one or perhaps a few of those fragments.

Perfect, thanks @swansont Yes. At the Event Horizon the space-time curvature is such that no geodesics, or trajectories, lead outside the Event Horizon., not even for light. It is curved in a way that all paths lead to the future collision with the center of the Black Hole ( whatever that may be ). A neutron star isn't massive enough and its constituent neutrons can resist further gravitational collapse due to neutron degeneracy pressure. Interesting & yes, this is due to Pauli's exclusion right? And only gravity is capable of overcoming degeneracy?

Potential silly question, Can I interpret this as meaning gravity itself creates or might be creating the EH? And that a neutron star, wouldn't have enough gravity to do this? Could someone clarify for me please, these Eigenstates, are they themselves the measurement of whatever it is you are measuring? Is that the scientific word for the measurements of QM? Down Quark (measured eigenstate?) Up Quark (superpositioned eigenstate?)

Ahh ok, thanks studiot

My bad, I misread & misinterpreted what MigL wrote. @ studiot What is PofLE please?

That is potentially awesome for my idea 🙂. Ahem, I mean, ty @studiot And would this energy stored massless field follow The principle of minimum energy too? So the energy has to be stressed, hmm so going back to a BH, has it ever been considered that the inside of it could be a massless field of stressed energy. And sorry 1 more, if it's massless fields being spoken about, would they not also have massless (non) particles? Perhaps positive & negative? You would have to explain how a neutron structure could exist under such a large attraction. I think I can now & I also don't see the inside as neutron related at the moment. Thank you, really, to all of you that have helped & put up with me, right or wrong as this idea will be, I appreciate it.

Thanks @MigL Have any of you known gravity to be caused by something other than mass?

Thanks @swansont

Thanks @MigL, fermions can be overcome by gravity. Interesting. Gravity is one of the bosses of the universe it seems. Fundamental perhaps? One last question please for someone/s. If science doesn't can't state the interior composition of a BH, How do you know how heavy a BH is? Is this based on Neutron Star collapse & it's weight?

I used to be paranoid before I found out it was the person behind me. I used to be a paranoid schizophrenic before I found out it was myself behind me.

Thanks studiot, that's ok actually, it was more the description of it that caught my eye. The master field. I recall on the link further back to a Sean Carroll lecture that he said that science was now considering? a new bizarre concept that maybe everything is made by fields, not particles (think I got that right) I still have @Mordred advice to drop the original sqep etc echoing in my brain & am trying to find ways to keep it short & sweet. So the master field sounded spot on. All I can think of to call it is the SP-NNPF & that;s still a lot of letters. Even the scientific term I have for them (yet to be disclosed) makes it a 5 letter description. Super Positioned Nameless Non Particle Field. I am a lazy writer I'm afraid, it's easier to abbreviate after I give you the definition of the abbreviation. And as for that thread, I kinda just browse mostly, its' interesting to see the facts that you folks come out with in your replies. I don't always understand much of what I read but sometimes the fragments of science that I have studied a bit, are brought together from your replies & make more sense to me. Question or 2 if I may Do Neutron stars leak Hawkins radiation? And how is it that you know a neutron star & BH are actually made of dense matter? I know you have the maths, have you also measured somehow the matter that is inside a BH & defined different types, like metals, gas for instance?

Hmm so if you hadn't noticed (regarding my question above), I can be as thick as I am clever sometimes. Another double I guess. I think you @studiot mentioned Sean Carroll as thinking about a master field. Thank you, this is actually how I'm seeing this idea. If everything in the universe has it's own field then my ideas SP-NNP must also have one. As well it it's own force. And also it friend Time. Its 23 days until the anniversary of my posting this idea & I am looking at posting the vastly improved (description at least) version of this idea. For the record, I saw possible DM to start with, without understanding more about other things & I'm not sure it is directly pointing towards DM but more towards, something that created the DM to start with. However now, it appears (to me for now) to not only offer a non & anti non particle but also it's own field & force. This field is how I see the universe itself. Ignoring everything else, the universe exists everywhere, all at the same time, directly or indirectly. It answers the infamous something from nothing question. Though the SP-NNP isn't totally nothing, it's as close as anything can be to being nothing. I will explain more on the 24th all going well. For now I will say this. Within this idea I see the force holding the SN-NNP's together as being the Gravit. A precursor to gravity itself.

Interesting. 🙂

Thanks

Thanks, I'm flattered. Yes VP's are very interesting, they had me quite curious for a while, as did the Dark Photon, however the road this idea is taking me towards is something that allows the creation of fields & particles & has to be everywhere, all at the same time, all the time & always has or will be. I think I am proposing something at a very fundamental level, maybe even THE fundamental level . I think it would have to be for it to exist the way it seems to in this idea & I'll also throw in Ontic as a description for it. I understood this to mean simply 'being' & it describes this NNP/F quite well. Idk, I can see it quite clearly but still learning how to put it across properly & I must stress that this all falls within the confines of this idea only. It would have to seemingly excite to some extent but mostly it would perhaps be observed as fluctuating if it is observational at all. Hope I remembered that the right way round, excite is direct measurement right? Thanks, I try, it is just an idea Yes it does, even with newton & the apple. Within this idea, I see this SP-NNP & it's accompanying SP-NNP Field. I do have scientific names for the SP-NNP, SN-NNPF & the force that holds the SP-NNP together but I will withhold them for now. I should add, like all particles seemingly, the SP-NNP- also exists within this idea. The anti SP NNP. or SN NNP- This nameless non particle is literally one step away from being absolute 'nothing' A discrete entity, interesting. It's more like the shadow of a discrete entity. Or the shadow of the shadow of a discrete entity but also less than a shadow... if I understand your question correctly. Unique construct in my model. Unique yes, I think it's uniqueness sets everything else in motion & then everything else keeps the SP NNPF going... Unique to my idea?, probably not. More likely I have got my wires crossed & it really will turn out to be nothing but a nice story. I think if it is real, science has known about it already for a while but for some reason has dismissed it or not taken it into account. That's a mighty big if btw. Nth big And that's very hard to believe, you folks seem to have gone nth places with maths & science. Still find it astounding. It does have a pattern I guess, to me it's a seemingly ordered, randomness eventually leading towards an 'assembly' where they finally become one - Ontic if you will, possibly not for the first time. I do see a wavelength/vibration but that's another part of the idea. Anyway, I seem to have written a lot again. No need to reply, hope it answers you helpfully. I won't post any maths yet but hope to in the future, no matter how bad it might be.

@Phi for All Please don't take that blank analogy the wrong way, It wasn't meant to be annoying. Not even slightly. Aside from 1 post, have you ever known me to post something annoying? I don't think anyway, though I will admit I have probably frustrated a few of you with my lack of knowledge / understanding. Maybe a better thing to have done is asked me what I'm going on about. I didn't think it would draw your ire. Or anyone's. Maybe a better idea would have also been for me to explain more too I suppose. Hmm. Ok I see your point. But for what it's worth, I was waiting to see if anyone asked about it. I will happily explain if I may. The analogy is that is it indeed 'blank' as I put it (not 'nothing', just blank), before anything is drawn onto the page, it could be anything, super positioned until written/observed. And it can be absolutely anything you can think of text or symbol wise before observation. I'm trying to put across the way I see this SN-NNP I have spoken about. The idea (which I haven't gone into fully) seems to point beyond DM, DE, as odd and OTT as I'm sure that must sound. In the idea, I see it as being the very thing that allows, create, decays, infuses with everything else. It is 'something' and 'nothing', both dead and alive as it were. It seems to work in a similar way to memory storage. Maybe super positional memory storage. In the idea, not real life. But I need to learn more about the eigen's still. Apologies for making you or indeed, anyone else frustrated, I was waiting to see if anyone asked. I know not who looks at this. And the who I do not know, I didn't think were many. My questions sometimes go un-answered so I wonder if I have asked something stupid or something. Thanks for reading this anyway Phi, nice to know you do. Though, maybe you won't now. And thanks to anyone else who has or does look at this. The idea still requires a lot of work but at some point in the future I should hopefully be able to muster up a tidy explanation of it. Please tell me if I have mis understood super position by the way.

@Sohan Lalwani Scroll up a little. Regarding the idea. I should have said the above 'blank' is analogous to how I think this SN-NNP behaves & where the SN-NNP is infused / created & decayed.

It has my very very crude understanding of maths and only in a 'SP' vector (I think) however I need to learn more before I could have faith that what I put forward would make enough sense to me & also to anyone that reads this. And it describes something that might actually be beyond DM, DE or more 'angstrom2' like? nth tiny Anyway, I came here today to write something I didn't see coming, at all if I'm honest. I'm not forced to eat my words but I have seen a few replies recently from @Sohan Lalwani and they have come across as seemingly quite mature & polite. So I should acknowledge that in the scheme of things perhaps. I won't give you +1 but it's nice to see, well done. Most people here that reply to you are usually only ever trying to help you. The rest of this reply is intentionally 'blank' but to me anyway, it gives a tldr'ish very simple overview of my idea atm. End of 'blank' ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Have a good weekend

Thanks, that helps. I think. You will know if it does as it will be used in this idea. I can see it fitting in but still need to understand it more. Can I think then of eigenspace, eigenfunction, eigenvalue, eigenvector and eigenstate being used to describe pretty much anything, ever with maths being the universal language?

Taken from the net: eigenstates /ī′gən-stāt″/ Plural form of eigenstate nounOne of a set of quantum-mechanical descriptions of the possible state of a physical system, using the mathematics of eigenvectors and generally existing in a state of superposition until the moment of observation. A dynamic quantum mechanical state whose wave function is an eigenvector that corresponds to a physical quantity. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition • More at Wordnik In the orange part I have highlighted, in lay mans terms, can I understand this as being a measurement becoming a particle becoming a part of other particles/atoms/fields? And if it is say, a D quark, then the SuperPoisitioned quark would be an U quark.

It’s got to be a system where it makes sense to apply QM to it, i.e express a wave function and apply an operator. Thanks Also thanks.

I don’t know what that means. I had a thought in my head but if what I wrote didn't make sense then I think I might have gone a bit awry in the way I understand a system. I'll come back to this another time, I think it's important. For what it's worth, I was wondering about a universe sized system. One that all other systems fall into, make up & mimic somehow.