Imagine Everything

Why doesn't France have any painkillers? Because Paracetamol

Systems can have an infinite number of eigenstates. It depends on the system. The energy states of the hydrogen atom, for instance, has an infinite number of levels. But a simpler finite square well has a finite number. Yeah I worded that badly, but that's what I was trying to find out. Thanks. This idea has to be everywhere, all the time, all at the same time so these eigenstates are very interesting. As is entanglement but I guess I need to go re read up on that. No, to say “due to entanglement” gets cause and effect backwards. Entanglement is a two-particle situation. You can describe superposition in a single system. Can that one system also be as big as it can be tiny, so to speak? A system made of other systems, made of other systems... ?

Interesting. So does that mean there can only be nth eigenstates in a system that are required by that system? It would have to be a minimum of 2 due to entanglement? Or am I remembering incorrectly. If I'm way off, no need to explain. I appreciate what you have said. I can do some research. Thanks

Forenote, I couldn't seem to edit the word links to normal, I haven't placed links on purpose except for the wiki site directly. It was copied and pasted from there. May I ask, if the next bit is what you science guys calls measurement? In various interpretations of quantum mechanics, wave function collapse, also called reduction of the state vector,[1] occurs when a wave function—initially in a superposition of several eigenstates—reduces to a single eigenstate due to interaction with the external world. Taken from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_function_collapse Can I also take from this that the eigenstate is the superpositioned non measurement (or pre measurement) and that the wavelength collapse is also known as measurement? Interaction with the external world meaning, other fields? other particles?

Thank you @StringJunky It's a very odd but also very very interesting scenario isn't it. Sorry if went slightly OT, didn't mean to take anything away from your original post.

Thanks for posting this @StringJunky Interesting stuff. Is the twin slot experiment also, almost directly, evidence of superposition. (We just can't see it right?) Showing the effects of said superposition projected into the multiple slots they create on the other side.?

This is for my future reference, thanks joigus Gravitons, provided they exist, should not have mass. Interaction carriers having mass would violate gauge symmetry. Gravitons, provided they exist, should be sourced by anything having local energy density, not particularly hyper-dense sources. Gravitons, provided they exist, should not undergo any appreciable clustering themselves.

You are not wrong. Though liking the maths? hmm, not so much lol. Still only have a very basic grasp on it. Thanks @dimreepr

It's not really about being right, well not much anyway. That was tongue in cheek. I doubt I am right. But I am extremely curious why I had this vision in the first place and some of it seemed to be similar-ish to actual proven science. So it would be cool if (with you folks help) if I could eventually find out whether this idea is worth it's ink or just a pointless thought experiment. But that won't happen for a while, have a lot to write still and am not rushing. I want to at least get my idea put across in a manner more befitting for the science community to look at. If I can achieve this, that would at least be a milestone for me personally. I knew nothing about science a year so ago.

Hmm, really didn't think I'd come back if I'm honest. When I get annoyed with someone, that's it for me, no going back. I hate that about myself but I just don't feel I can be around certain people. It might be explained as me feeling like that person is anti matter. However, it would seem science & my idea have not let go of me and neither have you or your forum. You're like an EH that won't leave my grumpy galaxy alone. No need to click the links, they're there for my future self so I don't forget. In quantum mechanics, the measurement problem is the problem of definite outcomes: quantum systems have superpositions but quantum measurements only give one definite result.[1][2] Copied from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measurement_problem https://quantumphysicslady.org/glossary/measurement-problem/ Thank you @dimreepr for posting this. https://scienceforums.net/topic/136084-could-a-quantum-computer-solve-the-measurement-problem/ I don't think my idea explains why you can't measure more than 1 result but it does ponder on the rest of the measurement. What I see (for now at least) as the non measurement, measurement. I asked once, when a particle is measured, and it falls within in given measurement tolerance, it there still a bit of left over in the tolerance. I have rewritten more now and this SQEP idea seems to be presenting itself to describe, DM, QH, DECAY, PRE BB, CREATIVE DESTRUCTION, SUPERPOSITION, among other things. SuperPosition is the best friend to my idea. Such a wonderful and weird concept, yet it is a something, it would seem. And also not until it was measured. I am not saying any of this is true, except for the already proven science I have added to support the idea. And I take no credit for them either. I just have scientific names for things now. I hope. They belong to you folks in the science world, you have literally been almost everywhere it would seem, measured so much, do you know how hard it is to come up with something new??? It is truly truly astounding. You are truly truly astounding. Stop it! NOW! let MEEEEEE discover something please, be nice !! :) Anyway it is an idea that now has some scientific names & hopefully science, supporting it. I am only too aware that for it to work, it would have to be tested and tested and tested and nth... And then there's the maths, definately not my strong point) And how do I measure 'nothing' or indeed anyone else directly. How do I even test 'nothing' And I am only one person out of nth (past or present)? This alone makes me doubt my idea immensely, Yet, when it's ready, I will post a little more about it. I feel compelled, otherwise why did I end up writing a thesis' for a week last year. Feeling like something was talking through me, sending me a flood of information that I didn't have the words or knowledge for. For me, it felt like having a new language dumped into my brain without understanding any of it. If nothing else, I hope to present it better now. A lot better. So I'll 'see' you on the SuperPositioned day of Probability in the future, Randomly, maybe... '

Hmmm...ok, well it would seem the quote function didn't work when I replied before. But ok, np. I'm not here to disrespect any of you folks here and sohan/m_m seem to have annoyed me I guess. I don't like people like them. My apologies for going off topic. I don't like or respect Sohan / m_m at all. And that's me being nice. I didn't join this forum to end up in this position but also I will not put up with people like this. So, thank you @Phi for All for allowing me to post an idea I had, ( and thank you very much @studiot @Mordred @swansont for helping me learn) and I leave the door open to you very clever and far more understanding/compassionate than me science, mathematician folks to tell me through a private message if you still want me here. What people do, is as important as what people don't do. The unseen is as important as the seen. More pairs... My life is riddled with pairs, doubles, opposites etc. I see the universe this way. I will not post again unless I am pm'd, that isn't a request and I do not expect a pm. I am a nobody of nobodies. Isolation seems to be married to me for some reason, always has, always will I guess. If this were a normal forum, I wouldn't hold back about those two but I respect you other folks (not sohan or m_m) and I do not wish to disrespect you the way sohan or m_m have in my view. My apologies to the op, I didn't intend or mean to change direction of your thread. It's extremely difficult to account for the unforseeable future or the people that come into it. @ the moderators, perhaps you could look into why the quote function didn't seem to work and future help others who may also run into this problem. Thank you to the people that have helped me learn and advance my idea, you know who you are. And I am very grateful. Lastly, information is passed between 2 receivers, however that information is produced I believe. Back on topic, Information is communicated. Communication is language. It is up to us or other intelligent life forms to understand or discover it if we want to, in my opinion.

Animals present various forms of communication, everything counts including but not limited to chemical signals, reactions to physical stimuli, and audio based communication. Please stop trying to argue for the sake of nothing Animals can communicate via sound, that is talking in some sense I didn't say that, try reading through before posting your dim witted, brain dead answers.

Arguing for the sake of arguing.. .yes you are m_m. So am I, try thinking about it more. Animals talk in their own language. NOT YOURS. Get yourself a pet and you might understand. Language comes in all forms...body language, audio language, sign language... Communication is language.....

And animals don't talk, literally. They do talk, in their language not ours. Both in body language and audio.

I was browsing DM and saw this. It kind of almost yelled at me to post it. Not to tell you about it, you folks have so much knowledge, it's still quite staggering to me, it's more to do with this thread, it's perhaps a visual or what I will post in the future when I finish rewriting my original 'pre-forum posting' idea AISOO v2 (iirc). https://scitechdaily.com/the-large-hadron-collider-is-breaking-new-ground-in-the-search-for-dark-matter/ And also https://astronomyexplained.com/dark-matter-vs-antimatter-what-is-the-difference/ My initial post here, was eventually leading up to DM but I wrote so much last year before posting on the scienceforum, it would have been a deluge of nonsence as it stood. Maybe it still will be lol. Time will tell I suppose. Yes @Mordred No more SQEP's matey :) Hopefully the idea I had (which has evolved a bit now) will continue to seemingly (to me at least) fit into the things I have learnt and continue to read about or discuss. For now, just thought the images were important and ofcourse also the background articles that accompanied them on the websites. September 24, 2024 @swansont The bottom line for physics is being able to predict or explain behavior of some phenomenon, usually with a calculation, as applied to some experiment. What observed phenomenon does this apply to? Hopefully DM and possibly DE but not sure about the DE side at the moment. I know how that might sound every time I write it but I can't hide from what I think this idea is. I actually look forward to and anticipate already, someone telling me it isn't viable so that I can put this to rest in a strange & idea closing, way. It will settle my mind (I hope) :)

I get the grasp of what you said there @StringJunky and thank you. I guess I didn't have the right words but yeah, everything that ever is or was or could be has to come from something somewhere and had an effect on whatever interacts with either in the past, now or the future. Everything has had, is having and will have a knock on effect. Random but ordered and then perhaps more randomness and perhaps more order. I so want to say more but that is for my initial thread but this thread I started because it really struck me how random & ordered the video was regarding the different things. If I take that further, those videos & musicians wouldn't have been able to play those songs if the original singers/bands hadn't made them. And those original bands/singers had families & friends/enemies? who would have influenced them and would also have been influenced by, who also led their own lives...nth A universe sized supply chain perhaps. 2.From almost nothing to something :) Both working perfectly in tandem with each other. Maybe it's not just free will, could that be paired too with our "sixth sense" where we pick up feelings from seemingly nowhere and that itself encourages us to make a choice in certain way. Still free will but also humanised entanglement if you will, with our surroundings, all the time, everywhere, all at the same time, thinking about the effect everything seems to have on everything. The butterfly effect I guess. Also, as we are eventually made of fields and particles, would this behaviour also apply to them? Nature following nature... When I read the news, look around, ponder stuff, it seems like the human race (on one level anyway) is heading towards an 'anything that can be' (personality wise) 'will be' direction. Undetermined personality evolution perhaps and will keep going because no 2 people are absolutely identical to the last thought. Though there will no doubt be an exception to that as well at some point lol. Probabilistic that a new human will have & develop one, randomness perhaps being the one they 'choose'. @StringJunky One of your signatures reminded me of something I saw the other day. Confucius says: "Man with watch always knows the time. Man with two watches is never sure." "Naked man not worry about pickpockets" It nothing to do with me, I don't take credit for that. Might have been on tv. Just thought it was humerous.

Thank you. I think I was a little lazy when I posted this. The music is probably irrelevant to some degree. It's cool that it's not your taste, if it was and everybody else's taste, perhaps there would be no randomness involved lol. I thought the videos were a great visual guide to describe the quantum mechanics that happened, have happened and are still happening. I was looking at this from a fundamental (and then upwards) view. All the fields, all the particles, the excitements, fluctuations, all the atoms, molecules, DNA and nth more that have to come together in order to eventually make all the different instruments, the land they're playing on, the stadium itself, the different people & their own personal styles & personalities, different backgrounds, different upbringings, the parents that brought them into the world, the different life paths they must have all taken to get to this point. All random yet coming together as order. And so much more, all seemingly random at points throughout their lives coming together to act as one entity in harmony. An easy way to see it might be to think of random dancers in a music video doing their own thing and every now and then synchronising together to do the same dance before breaking back into their own freestyle. I think even though the dances might appear random, perhaps the order exists at the same time if they were all following a time count, like everyone syncing every 20 seconds or something simliar. Random order? Ordered randomness? Could go so far with this, such as the earth forming and coming together in the way it has to enable eventual life, material formations & then life discovering the things we have so on and so forth. And as you guys know, it goes all the way back to the BB and perhaps further. Nthless :) (endless) It is absolutely fascinating and amazing to me. There's probably even a maths route to describe it but ugh, maths isn't my thing it would seem, so I can't say anything in that respect.

The randomness is all the very different people that have their own styles as you will see from the video/s. The order is all of them coming together to create harmony. It's not click bait, just some music. Just thought how cool it was. All the quadrillions of different atoms coming together to produce these songs. Truly amazing when i think about it so I thought I'd share. Enjoy. Here's the page https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=1000+musicians Here is some music. It's truly amazing what we can do if we come together. Sadly some people are hell bent on being the opposite... And no, I have nothing to do with it, I just stumbled across this and saw how truly cool it is.

Spot on. Me too and also by the things they don't do. People's actions speak vastly louder than their words and also shows me the sort of person they are. People have agendas, me included. Animals don't seem to. They are what they are, nothing more, nothing less. Animals can be trusted to just be what they are. You're right and I actually wish this could be true but life exp teaches us to be suspicious of other people, never heard of a cat or dog raping a human, or robbing a human or shoplifting to sell their stolen items to buy drugs ... It would be great if we could all do this but it's not how we are programmed. I read some time ago that humans ultimately want two things - reward and recognition - however or whatever form that comes in. Domestic animals just want to be looked after, Wild animals just want to live. I'm afraid I am the opposite of you or your thinking regarding this subject. I don't trust people, I don't really like most people I come into contact with and I would rather be with my cat than I would a lot of people I encounter each day. Animals to me are, to an extent what humans aren't. They are pure. They don't lie, they don't steal and they don't cheat and they don't have ego's that need constant feeding by manipulating or abusing others.

A little proverb... The sun and the wind had a bet on a man walking along in a thick winter coat. The wind bet that he could blow the mans coat off. The sun disagreed. So the wind blew and blew and blew as much as it could and all the man did was tighten his jacket up more each time. So then the sun had it's turn. It did nothing more than shine. It didn't shine brighter or warmer, it just simply shone. And as the man grew warmer, slowly he undid his coat and then took it off completely. You can downvote me all you like, votes are not the reason I came here. And to everyone else, I won't say anything more about this person in public. If I continue to be annoyed by this person I will speak to a mod or simply leave. For what it's worth, regardless of someone (whoever it is) being out of line, if a lot of people start having a go at them, it becomes bullying and that is not the person I am. Bullying doesn't always mean throwing punches.

You are rude and disrespectful. You sometimes sound adult ish but act like a child. You spam this forum like a teenage boy trying to get laid. And all you do is annoy people judging by the minus rep you are getting. I'm surprised you're not banned yet tbh. My apologies to the mods, admin, scientists and mathameticians , I've tried not saying anything negative about this person but man... (and sorry for going slightly off topic. I won't say anymore.) Also, he or she makes me not want to post here whilst they are still able to, I can only imagine the stupid answers they might reply with. I'm sure this person must be close to being banned, I ask that you do and soon please. Or at least limit what they are allowed to post or reply to.

What would be the best thing that could happen to the Earth? Maybe that's not really the right question. No offence. The Earth will die at some point when our star goes SN and turns into a white dwarf. The Earth was created by the universe and at one point was just meer clumps of dust and bits that gradually grew together to create the Earth which was then a rocky ball of lava and fire for a while. So whatever we as humans, do to it, it won't be worse off than it originally was and thinking universally, perhaps the Earth was created so that it can be destroyed to carry on the creation/destruction/creation cycle of the universe. You can't make an omlette without breaking the egg. So we aren't the worst but we don't seem to be helping ourselves with all the damage we are doing. If we want to survive as a race then we need to find a way to planet hop & in the meantime we need to stop ruining our planet as there is no planet B. yet...

Mrs Tilly likes Mrs Tilly but not Mr Stilly

No, not even once weirdly.

quick question because sometimes I dont fully understand what I see, read or hear. Ontic This means something that is alive or being? Ontological This means being aware that you are alive / being? Thanks as always to anyone who replies to this if anyone does.