Genady

It's not only us, humans. E.g. my dog barks when he sees something strange esp. if it's moving, until he figures out that it's not animate. Or, if animate, not a threat.

2 boats is perhaps correct - this is easy to count. The other numbers are more unreliable. Regardless, the reality is not what Putin expected. Or, anyone else.

Thank you.

The apology accepted. I did not mean to ask what I did not ask.

This underwater garden is created by fire corals. Beautiful to look at, but quite painful to touch. Actually, these colonies are not true corals, but other cnidarians. Here is another:

Where are these numbers from?

I'd like to learn what and how this research adds to our understanding of eukaryote evolution.

Metals are not chemicals and insects are not animals.

They don't synthesize organic matter. They consume it.

This is an example of what I've referred to earlier: Study: Female sharks can reproduce without males | The Seattle Times

Any time.

No. They give birth to their own genetic clones.

I don't know about the birds you've mentioned, but I know that other species do. For example, sharks. PS. Sharks... not laying eggs, of course, but giving birth without a male.

This is NOT what the GR equations show. This is just wrong.

Yes.

I didn't say that. The OP did.

I think the spelling should rather be, Фак Путин. I agree either way.

Religion is a phenomenon and it can be rationally studied as such. Science of religion Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster

as you said, "a tool used to alleviate followers from responsibility. ..."

Thank you.

Is there a correlation?

If you show how you get to these numbers maybe we can see where the mistake is...

I don't see in this research suggestion of a new hypothesis about the emergence of eukaryotic features from prokaryotic ancestors, neither a new support for any existing hypothesis. I see a way of storing DNA in gigantic bacteria.

This was my definite impression.

I'd think that in a) it's rather n=9 and r=4... The author was right.