Everything posted by Genady
-
The sum of the series
-
A grid and a shape
OK then. Consider the other challenge: prove that it is impossible. IOW, prove that any shape with area <1 can be placed on the plane without touching the grid.
-
Find the numerical value
Hint: if you think to take the cube of this expression, you are on the right track.
-
How far into the future do we care? And why?
This is a short-term future, isn't it?
-
Humanity, Post Humanity, A.I & Aliens
However, as of today, there is no intelligence in "artificial intelligence". It is marketing gimmick. See for example, There’s no such thing as Artificial Intelligence – Australian Data Science Education Institute (adsei.org). Some quotes:
-
Confusion with finite sets vs an infinite set of natural numbers
I wouldn't say in this case, "as n goes to infinity", because n doesn't "go" at all here, but rather is one arbitrary member of the set / sequence. Also, the expression, "for all n element of N", doesn't make sense to me in this case. One could write that there is mapping from the set N to set of rows such that every n in N is mapped to a row {1,2,3, ..., n}. See, e.g., Mapping | mathematics | Britannica.
-
Confusion with finite sets vs an infinite set of natural numbers
If we will continue the discussion of my proof that the set S is not in the list, the following clarification of the list might help: l=1 L={1} l=2 L={1, 2} l=3 L={1, 2, 3} l=4 L={1, 2, 3, 4} ... Or, equivalently: l=1, L = {x| x∈N & x≥1 & x≤1} l=2, L = {x| x∈N & x≥1 & x≤2} l=3, L = {x| x∈N & x≥1 & x≤3} l=4, L = {x| x∈N & x≥1 & x≤4} ...
-
Confusion with finite sets vs an infinite set of natural numbers
The last two lines above are wrong. The set on the line 5 in your list is {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}. This is the set L for l=5, i.e., L = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}.
-
Confusion with finite sets vs an infinite set of natural numbers
L does not have to be in S, and it not in S. L is a set on a line in your list. Each line in your list has a set. L is one of these sets, the one on the line number l.
-
Confusion with finite sets vs an infinite set of natural numbers
No, l is not a sequence. It is a number. It is a number of some line in your list. We don't know which line it is, thus we call it l.
-
Confusion with finite sets vs an infinite set of natural numbers
L is not a line in S. L is a set on a line number l in your list. If this is clear, I'll go to the second question.
-
Confusion with finite sets vs an infinite set of natural numbers
It is not 1, it is l (the letter): L = {x| x∈N & x≥1 & x≤l}
-
Confusion with finite sets vs an infinite set of natural numbers
I don't know what you mean in the second statement, but here is a proof that this set is not there. Let's define the set: S = {x| x∈N & x≥1} Let's assume that the set S is in the list. Then there is a line, l, in the list with this set on it. The set on line l is: L = {x| x∈N & x≥1 & x≤l} But L ≠ S which contradicts the assumption. Thus, S in not in the list.
-
Confusion with finite sets vs an infinite set of natural numbers
This is wrong, i.e., not every possible set of increasing natural numbers (that increase by 1 starting from 1) is there. The set {1, 2, 3, 4, ...} is a possible set of increasing natural numbers (that increase by 1 starting from 1), and it is not there.
-
Puzzle for the Day
I got a simple solution, perhaps the one you have in mind:
-
Spooky experiences
These facts: my father died on my daughter's birthday, and my son was born on my mother's birthday.
-
Puzzle for the Day
Thanks. I got a semi-mechanical way to generate solutions now. Here is another one, not simpler though:
-
Carbon Capture Suggestion
I got the idea. You freeze the sediment on the bottom. Being lighter than water, the chunks of ice with the sediment will float up by themselves. 🤩
-
Puzzle for the Day
We have 9 numbers, 91/8 each. If we remove any of them, we get 8 equal numbers, which can obviously be arranged into two sets of equal sums. If we add all numbers, we get 9*91/8 = 99/8. If we multiply all numbers, we get (91/8)9 = 99/8. They are equal.
-
9x9 magic squares:
It seems to give 76 equations with 83 unknowns. Should be possible. PS. I assume they ask about a non-trivial solution, i.e., all zeroes.
-
Pride vs Humility
This - my emphasis - is a narrower subset. You might be right about them, I don't know.
-
Pride vs Humility
I don't think they forget. Plus, most of these "helpers" didn't act in order to help the "millionaire" to become one. They, mostly, did what they did in order to help themselves and their families.
-
Pride vs Humility
I agree with your both paragraphs. However, I want to add that in my personal experience, I have met and got to know many non-millionaires who are equally "ruthless, extremely selfish, unsympathetic, greedy, and tight... behind a cloak showing a face of care and compassion." I suspect that both categories are just people.
-
Pride vs Humility
"self made" = "by one's own actions". It says nothing about the environment in which actions are taken. Particularly, it does not say that are taken in empty space / on a deserted island.
-
Pride vs Humility
Ah, sure. But I don't think this is what a "self made millionaire" means.