# Wulphstein

Senior Members

196

1. ## New Approach to Anti-gravity [Split from: A New Area Law in General Relativity, questions.]

There are certainly technical issues that make design difficult. If you know of a text book of quantum entanglement for neophytes, let me know. Just photons by themselves have the problem that if you redshift or blueshift them, there are no vacant quantum frequency states that can do the... "this part is hard to explain". I think it's the vacant states, the non excited states of the quantum vacuum that are secretly and mysteriously trading information with each other. I don't know exactly how. It's not that unusual to say that physics information can only move at the speed of light. What is unusual is when you think specific types, like frequency (time), wavelength (spacial geometry), energy (frequency), and momentum (wavelength) are all mixing together. Sorry, I don't mean to add confusion to the answer. But a quantum entanglement, between two photons, has some of those same empty states available. Centrifuging is intended to put those frequency states in order, from smallest to largest. Then we can use those $F = ma =\hbar \frac { \Delta \omega}{\Delta x}$. Another way to look at is is the entanglement is still a virtual photon that obeys $c = \lambda_1 \nu_1 = \lambda_2 \nu_2$, where $\lambda$ is related to the geometry and frequency is related to time. Another way to think of it is that the potential energy stored by gravitational blue shift/redshift is $\Delta U + h(\nu_2 - \nu_1) = 0$. If I think of a clearer way to argue it, I'll post it.
2. ## Scientists looking for a Mirror Universe?

To be fair, the idea does tickle my fancy for a good science fiction thriller movie.
3. ## New Approach to Anti-gravity [Split from: A New Area Law in General Relativity, questions.]

Thank you for your feedback. The concept that I'm trying to articulate (at the science standard) is that the empty/vacant frequency/energy quantum states have something to do with gravity (acceleration) fields. While gravity and curvature are an equilibrium of those states, the centrifuge (blueshift/redshift) of something that has those states in them (like an entanglement between two photons) can be centrifuged into a linear distribution. The entanglement would last until it mixes with the entropy of the rest of spacetime, but in doing so, you get an F=ma along the way. I'm trying to figure out how to state these concepts more precisely. I'll take a look at ARXIV. See if I can find something. Again, thank you. Find this interesting. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.07497.pdf
4. ## Human / Monkey Hybrids in China

I agree. They made a movie about what happens if you make monkeys smart. It didn't end well.
5. ## New Approach to Anti-gravity [Split from: A New Area Law in General Relativity, questions.]

Let us say we have a wave function with a frequency that is linear with position on the x-axis, that we could write the frequency as $\omega (x) = \frac{\Delta \omega}{\Delta x} x + \omega_0$. So the wave function would look like, $\psi = A e^{i \omega (x) t} = Ae^{i ( \frac{\Delta \omega}{\Delta x} x + \omega_0) t}$, Next, the quantum mechanics momentum operator in the x-direction is $\vec{p} = -i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}$. So if we apply the momentum operator to the wave function, we get something like $\vec{p} = -i \hbar \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x} = \hbar \frac{\Delta \omega}{\Delta x} t$. This is a momentum that is a linear function of time. When we calculate the force, $\vec {F} = \frac {d \vec {p}}{dt}$, we get a constant force that is equal to, $\vec {F} = \hbar \frac {\Delta \omega}{\Delta x}$ The centrifuging of entangled photons is intended to cause a wave function with a frequency term that is linear with x. If that could be tested successfully, then we might be able to create entangled photon pairs, what I call threads, that carry a force, $\vec {F} = m \vec {a} = \hbar \frac {\Delta \omega}{\Delta x}$. I think this is all we could hope for from an anti-gravity quantum field theory. Please feel free to comment and ask questions. Wow! It's a derivation of anti-gravity!!!
6. ## Pascal's Wager - Does this make sense?

I think a moderator should remind you that you are going off topic.
7. ## Scientists looking for a Mirror Universe?

I don't think I understood how a ten second difference in neutron decay would have any bearing on a mirror universe. But I admire their creativity. We need more of that in physics.
8. ## Scientists looking for a Mirror Universe?

The only mirror universe I know about is the one I look at every morning when I brush my teeth. Beyond that, there is nothing to the story other than fantasy and imagination.
9. ## Pascal's Wager - Does this make sense?

What does Odyssey of homer have to do with near death experiences? Somebody's heart stops and they meet GOD or Jesus, and you think that is equivalent to Odyssey of homer? Are you trying to be .....
10. ## Pascal's Wager - Does this make sense?

If anyone has had a near death experience with Krishna, Odin, Zeus, I haven't heard about it. Have you?
11. ## Pascal's Wager - Does this make sense?

Krishna, Odin, Zeus are not meeting anybody's spirit when they are at death's door. But there are thousands of videos and millions of testimonials, whole books written, even a neurosurgeon, who are eyewitness of GOD, Jesus, and others. If you want, I can refer you to that evidence and those testimonials. It is impossible for me to understand skeptics who claim that near death experience testimonials are not important to the subject of "what happens when we die", which is what Pacal's wager is meant to address. There might be ten million gods, but how many have been seen lately?
12. ## Pascal's Wager - Does this make sense?

swansont, Do you deny that this is an accurate representation of Pascal's wager? LOL There is no evidence of any kind to support this postulate. It shouldn't even be considered.
13. ## Pascal's Wager - Does this make sense?

As you say, I could be badly mistaken, but then again, here is the wager. So, it basically says if there is a God and you're an atheist, it says "eternal suffering" and there is a picture of fire. Does that pretty much explain what Pascal's wager is? Or should I make the picture bigger? I also brought into evidence, the testimonial of a lady who was an atheist, after beings a Christian, who went to Heaven and came back. Does anyone dispute the video?
14. ## Pascal's Wager - Does this make sense?

Pascal's wager is really about the atheist's concern that if they pick the wrong path, they'll be punished; but it's impossible to know which path is the right path. However, if atheists belief that God doesn't exist, then nothing happens when they die. Nothing means "no punishment". If there was evidence, if there was data of what happens to atheists when they die, it would be relevant to this conversation. I would invite the atheists, and everyone, to look at the data without deriding it or dismissing it. The answer you're looking for is there. It is the answer to Pascal's wager.
15. ## Yahawah, ancient name of God.

The hypothesis that the universe was engineered has important ramifications beyond religion. It has implications to engineering and science. Yes I did.
16. ## Yahawah, ancient name of God.

I heard the name and saw it spelled, which you're not supposed to be able to do in a (very profound) dream. It inspired me to start this post. What is interesting was that, I heard and saw the name Yahawa. I thought it was referring to a name of a native American city. So when I woke up, got on the computer and Googled it, it wasn't native American, it was the name of the ancient God of the Jews. It was a profound evidential experience for me, even though you atheists are trained like circus animals to discount it. As for begging the question of how the universe was created, atheist physics just says "I dunno". So we have to consider the other option that, the universe was designed (engineered) to lead to complex molecular cellular life capable of supporting consciousness and complex thought. The sheer absurdity of a "begging the question fallacy" regarding a created or engineered universe is itself a fallacy. It only proves that atheists can be trained to do tricks.

23. ## New Approach to Anti-gravity [Split from: A New Area Law in General Relativity, questions.]

The rest of it. This is about as far as I've gotten. The important part is that, if we really got good at centrifuging threads (quantum entanglement between two photons), they they could store a gravitational potential energy of $\Delta U = (1.0010295)*h\nu$ The rest of it.pdf
24. ## Experimenting with Latex

Cool! The potential energy is $\Delta U + h \Delta f = 0$
25. ## Experimenting with Latex

$\frac{1}{3}$ $\frac{2}{5}$
×