# Wulphstein

Senior Members

196

1. ## Experimenting with Latex

[latex﻿]\frac{\Delta_f}{f} = \frac{\lambda}{\lambda_o} = \frac{v}{c}=\frac{E_o}{E}=\frac{hc}{﻿\lambda_o} \frac{\lambda}{hc}[/latex﻿﻿﻿﻿﻿] [latex﻿]\frac{\Delta_f}{f} = \frac{\lambda}{\lambda_o} = \frac{v}{c}=\frac{E_o}{E}=\frac{hc}{﻿\lambda_o} \frac{\lambda}{hc}[/latex] $\frac{Delta_f}{f}$ Mordred, do I have latex privileges available to my account?
2. ## New Approach to Anti-gravity [Split from: A New Area Law in General Relativity, questions.]

Bingo! That I can explain. But first, I'm trying to get Latex to work. Unless you're okay reading PDF files.
3. ## LaTeX in science forums

[ math]x^2[/ math]
4. ## Experimenting with Latex

I'm trying to figure out how to program in Latex so I can post nice equations. \documentclass{article} \usepackage{graphicx} \begin{document} \title{Introduction to \LaTeX{}} \author{Author's Name} \maketitle \begin{abstract} The abstract text goes here. \end{abstract} \section{Introduction} Here is the text of your introduction. $$\label{simple_equation} \alpha = \sqrt{ \beta }$$ \subsection{Subsection Heading Here} Write your subsection text here. \begin{figure} \centering \includegraphics[width=3.0in]{myfigure} \caption{Simulation Results} \label{simulationfigure} \end{figure} \section{Conclusion} Write your conclusion here. \end{document} [latex ]\frac{\Delta_f}{f} = \frac{\lambda}{\lambda_o} = \frac{v}{c}=\frac{E_o}{E}=\frac{hc}{\lambda_o} \frac{\lambda}{hc}[/latex ]
5. ## New Approach to Anti-gravity [Split from: A New Area Law in General Relativity, questions.]

I will require someone with knowledge of physics who is also an innovator. If you close your eyes and ears, it is inevitable that you will choose not to understand the argument. I can't change that. Since you won't read the paper I attached, I'll have to get handy with Latex coding. I'll have to experiment with it. I uploaded a PDF file that we can discuss, if you're interested. Begin antigravity tech.pdf You don't need exotic matter to create spacetime curvature.
6. ## Yahawah, ancient name of God.

All I see in your comments are reasons why you will not understand antigravity technology. I speak for a billion human beings who are ready to travel to the stars. If there is anyone here who thinks they understand, I will teach. If not, I will look for someone who can understand the basics of the experiment.
7. ## New Approach to Anti-gravity [Split from: A New Area Law in General Relativity, questions.]

We can perform an experiment that can prove antigravity is possible. Exotic matter is unnecessary.
8. ## Yahawah, ancient name of God.

Can't you tell just by looking around that this universe has to be created by an Intelligent Designer?
9. ## Yahawah, ancient name of God.

I don't think atheists have enough sense to realize that a God can come into existence more easily than a fine tuned universe. That was my point. Having said that, the Creator, who is eternal, proved his existence to me.
10. ## Yahawah, ancient name of God.

God has always existed. God is the engineer who designed and created the universe, all life, and man. Does that make sense? God is current. I heard his name in a dream last night.
11. ## Yahawah, ancient name of God.

Oregon God has always existed. God is the engineer who designed and created the universe, all life, and man. Does that make sense?
12. ## Yahawah, ancient name of God.

I don't understand. I asked you to cite an example. What?
13. ## Yahawah, ancient name of God.

The universe is efficient. That's an established fact
14. ## Yahawah, ancient name of God.

Evading what? If anything, I thought I was being to hard on atheists.
15. ## Yahawah, ancient name of God.

I made a lot of points, made a lit of statements. Nobody was able to falsify my statements or tell me fallacy it violated, other than strawman. But no understandable argument was made or attempted. So therefore, my statements are valid.
16. ## Yahawah, ancient name of God.

Atheism is inconsistent with established science. You can believe in atheism, just like you can believe in unicorns, fairies and scientology.
17. ## Yahawah, ancient name of God.

This universe is very efficient. That is a fact. Atheists try to justify their atheist argument with quantum foam and 10^10^142 failed attempts. That is the least efficient way to create our universe. Therefore, it's false.
18. ## Yahawah, ancient name of God.

You offered a counter example. Let's hear it. Anyway I didn't understand your other question.
19. ## Yahawah, ancient name of God.

Name the counter example.
20. ## Yahawah, ancient name of God.

So atheism is falsified. It was crushed to death by two empirical facts. First, the universe is efficient. Think of the least action and least time principles. Therefore, quantum foam is falsified. Second, complex systems require engineering.
21. ## Yahawah, ancient name of God.

I solved antigravity with metaphysics. I work in the high tech industry. It is always cheaper to solve problems in the design stage. So you make a product one time, not 10^10^147 times, like atheists do. The innefiency of the quantum foam falsified it. Nature would choose a more metaphysical way to design it before setting off the big bang. You'll have to accept the reality that nature is efficient and prompt. Least action. Least time. The innefiency of the quantum foam falsified it. Nature would choose a more metaphysical way to design it before setting off the big bang. You'll have to accept the reality that nature is efficient and prompt. Least action. Least time.
22. ## Yahawah, ancient name of God.

God of the gaps is such an amazing tool, I was able to figure out how antigravity works in another thread! There is where I find atheism to be totally irrational. Why wouldn't you want a nice cozy warm inner feeling from a deity that ... was seen again... and now there is an anti-gravity paper. Sorry to hear that. In the engineering company I work at, anything goes! If it works, if it solves the engineering problem, then it doesn't matter where the idea came from. It sounds like you're trying to argue that engineering is unnecessary. Is that correct? Your argument makes absolutely no sense.
23. ## Yahawah, ancient name of God.

Metaphysics "The nature of things" is the way in which we figure out what kind of experiments can be performed to do important things like: invent antigravity by testing for it. You should ask: "what does Yahweh have to do with antigravity?"
24. ## Yahawah, ancient name of God.

Actually, I have demonstrated that there are millions, billions of human beings who are witnesses to God. That is an established fact. There are zero scientific experiments that have proven m-theory or quantum foam. That is a fact.
25. ## New Approach to Anti-gravity [Split from: A New Area Law in General Relativity, questions.]

My apologies. I misunderstood. I have never had a moderator censure an irrational skeptic before, on my behalf. Thank you.
×