Wulphstein

I don't understand?

Then why are you commenting in the "religion" part of the forum if you don't care about GOD?

Dude! We're fricken molecular robots!!!! How do you get that without planning? Do you live in an insane asylum? I mean, really, not to be mean, but ... Do you know that the earth is round? Not flat? Forgive me, I don't mean to be rude, but, can you function outside of an insane asylum? Can you offer an alternative? I said that the universe had to be planned out. That implies a creator, engineer, designer that is a lot smarter than we are? How is that not deserving of the title "god"? Because you sure as heck can't do it!

Yes, I don't see how you build a system with complex life from an accident, caused by mechanisms that just magically appeared out of nowhere. Believe me, it's much easier to throw a universe with life together if you actually plan ahead. I mean, how is that not obvious? I mean, itsn't it obvious that you don't get a human being without planning? Where does that happen where an accident leads to something as complicated as a human brain? I mean, "I dunno" is right up there with "it was magic!!!"

I can start a new thread with a PDF, as you request. But I'd like to keep all of the comments in this thread together. Can't do it tonight.

This is the theory of anti-gravity that I promised you. I'll just give you the first part, just to give you a chance to absorb it and critique/comment. Kill shot argument.docx

I would just argue that the database of near death experiences gives you a pretty good idea of what the afterlife and eternity are going to be like. To find happiness, a good Godly happiness based on loving thy neighbor, you're going to have to open your feelers, open your psychic sensitivities to feel the spiritual energies (without bias against them) to the loving heart of Infinite Consciousness. God loves you and you are part of GOD, the way a group of cells in your body is a part of you. Thou shall love the cells and cellular machinery that gave you life in this physical world. God gave you life in the spiritual world. If you are an atheist, stop denying GOD. This physical universe wouldn't be here if someone didn't figure out what physics constants were required to get good stable Elements in sufficient quantities to lead to complex biology and all that cellular machinery. You gotta think of this: it took a godlike being with godlike intelligence to figure out how to get micromachinery made of atoms and molecules to come from a set of physics constants! It's like throwing a bomb that explodes and turns into little nano robots that group together into life! What kind of intelligence would think that nanorobots could just happen by accident where all of the physics constants were just set by accident in such a way that an giant explosion would lead to molecular life? What kind of IQ would someone have to have to believe that all of this was an accident? Or maybe it took 10^10^147 accidents before finally happening? I don't wish to insult anyone's intelligence the way that "belief in atheism" insults mine. You are better off believing in unicorns than in atheism; at least you would be cute, funny, and fun to have around. And the girls would like you, or whatever you're into. I don't care what your motivations are for not believing in God. It's a belief that is unsupported with facts, and it's nuttier than nutty butter. If you don't like God, then just admit it. You think God is a jerk!

What if, during the big bang, the extreme energies caused hidden degrees of freedom to be expressed, causing the virtual photon to morph into another kind of boson or fermion? In other words, I am borrowing an idea from string theory that rolled up dimensions can exist in the virtual photon; and during the big bang, those high energies can change a virtual photon into something different. Is there any logical reason why this can't be true?

Can you post a description of vertex formulas?

I am referencing the Feynman lectures on physics, volume 3 http://bayanbox.ir/view/8431816323796678904/Feynman-lecthre-vol3-quantum.pdf I think I understand what you're asking. I am trying to convince you that there is one exigent virtual particle, the virtual photon, that is responsible for the existence of all physics, the standard model, space, time, charge, spin, conservation laws, everything! If a virtual photon has energy, then it will be a real photon with spin +/- 1 ħ and will be the typical boson that you asked about. But under different conditions, where the energies are like that during the leptogenesis epoch of the big bang, something happens to the virtual photon and it converts to an electron-positron pair. The electron has a spin +/- 1/2 ħ. The conservation laws exist because virtual photons are the mechanism that keeps track of lepton number/ color/ flavor/charge/iso pin/energy momentum, etc. The conservation laws exist because virtual photons are the mechanism that keeps track of lepton number/ color/ flavor/charge/iso pin/energy momentum, etc. You mentioned the graviton which is a spin 2 hypothetical particle. It is spin 2 because it is meant to represent the stress energy tensor, science forum mordrid 8-2-19.docx It was my original contention (claim) that the virtual photon is responsible for everything in physics. And that if it was not detected (after trying to find it), then it doesn’t exist. Therefore, the graviton doesn’t exist (we’ve tried to find it, but no success). However, I am going to claim that the quantum entanglement between two photons is the alternative to the graviton. I will develop the argument over the next few days.

zapatos, https://www.thefreedictionary.com/intuitive 3. Easily understood and simple to use: a web browser with an intuitive interface. The argument I am making is that if all of nature and physics is made possible by the underappreciated, poorly understood, exigent virtual photon; without it, nothing in physics can exist. Because it's "faith" in a definition which isn't good enough to figure out how anti-gravity works. For that, you will need to get down to the mechanisms that cause time and distance (spacetime) to exist; once you do that, then you can figure out how to induce curvature in spacetime without relying upon stress-energy tensor quantities of mass-energy. I was using the "photons emitted by Cs-137 to make atomic clocks work" as an example of how engineers use frequency to keep time very accurately. What I infer and suspect is that virtual photons have a whole range of vacant frequency states that allow nature to keep time. Similarly, the vacant wavelength quantum states are very much like a ruler, and in 3 dimensions, like spherical geometry. The derivation of special relativity, which led to time dilation between inertial reference frames, was what caused me to suspect virtual photons were responsible for 3D geometry, length contraction and time dilation. To recap, virtual photons are capable of keeping time, generating 3D geometry, and functioning as the mechanism needed for space-time to exist.

The very existence of virtual photons is closely tied to the phase angle of e^i*phi + 1 = 0. The virtual photon is configured with the speed of light c, and the Planck constant. Standard model particles and their particle fields are built up from the mechanisms made available by virtual photons. A standard model particle, boson or fermion, owes its diameter, progression in time, its mass and momentum to the virtual photons, which are prerequisites for other particles. Virtual photons are units of action. The wave function solution to quantum mechanics describes the exigent component, the virtual photon. The virtual photon/wave function system is equivalent to an inertial reference frame, sufficient to talk about special relativity. The non locality of quantum entanglements is handled by virtual photons. Gravity is the non local property of large numbers of virtual photons interacting, mixing quantum states into an equilibrium of distance, frequency states (time), momentum and energy states. The overall effect is the curvature of spacetime. The stress energy tensor is qualitatively similar to a positive charge. It produces a negative "gravitational charge" in the spacetime continuum. The result is a thermodynamic equilibrium of momentum quantum states at the macroscopic scale. Since momentum, wavelength, frequency (time) and energy states are all tied together via the virtual photon mechanism, gravitational redshift, gravitational time dilation and curvature of spacetime are made mechanistically possible and inevitable. The theory of antigravity follows.

Mordred, it is nice to talk to someone familiar with the physics. I want to first state that there are postulates and physics constants that can no longer be treated as unquestionable absolutes, but must be converted to mechanisms. The invariance of the speed of light, Planck constant, speed of light, what is the mechanism of time, mechanism of distance, are some examples. I want to do this, and you should to, because we can figure out antigravity (or whatever they call it now, gravity management?). I plan to argue that all aspects of physics can be implemented with one virtual particle, that is proven to exist, and under appreciated! We don't need superstrings, E8 crystals, loop networks, or any of that stuff that can't be proved. Parsimony and mechanisms. The derivation of special relativity is quite beautiful in its geometric simplicity. It can be explained quite well with light, lasers or photons, but none are needed. The speed of light is so important that time dilation and length contraction effects occur. It's practically a riddle. What are inertial reference frames made of, that does these things, with real photons, or without? If we only include things that exist, then inertial frames and spacetime itself must be made of virtual photons. The derivation of special relativity is quite beautiful in its geometric simplicity. It can be explained quite well with light, lasers or photons, but none are needed. The speed of light is so important that time dilation and length contraction effects occur. It's practically a riddle. What are inertial reference frames made of, that does these things, with real photons, or without? If we only include things that exist, then inertial frames and spacetime itself must be made of virtual photons. Do you remember how atomic clocks use cesium 137 photons to accurately tell time? That's how I got the idea that nature uses frequencies of virtual photons to tell time, and the wavelength states as measuring sticks. Permitivity and permeability are 2 additional degrees of freedom built into virtual photons as c^2*mu*epsilon =1. Permitivity and permeability are 2 additional degrees of freedom built into virtual photons as c^2*mu*epsilon =1. Virtual photons should really be referred to as vacant photons, as in, vacant of energy. When photons are vacant, then all of its frequency states and wavelength states, each an infinite set, perform tasks of maintaining the spacetime continuum, and mixing states with other virtual photons. In this way, the spacetime continuum is an equilibrium of well mixed virtual photon frequency and wavelength states. A frequency state is a place to put energy. A wavelength state is a place to put momentum

Does anyone agree that we should convert our understanding of spacetime into mechanisms of quantum mechanics? Something that explains time, distance, energy, mass into a more intuitive system?

I guess they can see us well enough to abduct some people. At least that's what I've heard. Make a good camp fire story.