Jump to content

Kartazion

Senior Members
  • Posts

    569
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Kartazion

  1. The misunderstanding of how quantum entanglement works is in the mechanism of transmission of information. since there can be no hidden variable (that's science). I simply substituted a ping-pong ball for a packet of information flowing between the two entangled particles. This information packet notifies the opposing particle of the discovery of its state by the measurement. Here we have the means of explaining how and when a particle has its left spin, that the other will necessarily have it on its right.
  2. The game of ping-pong is there to to remedy and fix the Bell's theorem. No more and no less. Since there is no hidden-variable. To explain the non-local I use the analogy of a ping-pong ball as an information packet. That's it.
  3. Why is entanglement instantaneous? Weren't you who said that instantaneness didn't exist in math? If they play at lightning speed, well there will always be a transition time. At 299.792 km / s Sinpmly this corresponds to the speed of the oscillation of information. In this analogy nobody loses the game until an outside intervention, namely the measure. No worries about that. It does not prevent the transition. It's an analogy. The entanglement corresponds to the game of ping-pong. If you don't play anymore, then there is no more entanglement.
  4. No, because the ball goes to player B. If player A no longer has the ball, then the entanglement is terminated.
  5. This corresponds to the speed of the oscillation of information. The information packet is represented by the ball. This is measured by the thickness of the net when none of the players has the ball.
  6. Yes it is when the player has the ball in his camp and so he can play it.
  7. Analogy and interpretation of quantum entanglement according to Kartazion Imagine a game of ping-pong. At the center is the singularity, or the source, where there is the net. Each of the players is a particle. Together, they therefore constitute the entangled pair throughout the game. The ball is the packet of information. Let me explain. If one player has the ball, well the other player does not. The state is therefore always opposed. The entanglement corresponds to the current game of ping-pong. But when a player wins or loses the game, or the game in progress, the ball is then in the possession of one of the two players. Here we have the state of measurement. The measure can correspond to an immobilization of one of the two players in his action to play; or by an interruption of an external event on the fragile dexterity that is quantum entanglement.
  8. New Theoretical Process for Manufacturing Qubit-type Quantum Memory The idea is to have an isolated proton without an electron, and to make absorb an electron entangled with the proton. The conservation of the quantum number remains. After having defined a value of the quantum number to a pair of entangled electrons, the idea is that to make of absorbing one of the two electrons to an isolated proton. After acquisition of the electron by the proton, the value of the quantum number is kept by the electron for a lifetime limited to the hydrogen atom, and keeps memory of the quantum number through the electron. The protium (the proton alone) is the most common isotope of hydrogen, and the only stable isotope without a neutron.
  9. New Theoretical Process for Manufacturing Qubit-type Quantum Memory Quantum Memory of the Proton Electron The idea is to have an isolated proton without an electron, and to ionize an electron entangled with the proton. The conservation of the quantum number remains. The magnetic quantum number mℓseems to be the best candidate. After having defined a value of the quantum number to a pair of entangled electrons, the idea is that of ionizing one of the two electrons to an isolated proton. After acquisition of the electron by the proton, the value ofthe quantum number is kept by the proton for a lifetime limited to the protium atom, the most common isotope of hydrogen, and the only stable isotope without a neutron. -In practice, can we have an isolated proton? Without being able to isolate only oneproton, we can ionize the whole of a mole. The mole would therefore have several copies of the same quantum information. -During ionization, does the technical challenge remain in the storage of ml? or the projection of angular momentum? It is noted that the quantum number remains invariant and is the object of conservation during a nuclear reaction.
  10. I used 'meditation' and not 'mediation'. ? No. Between 'meditation' and 'mediation'? I made a big mistake. Therefore I am definitely withdrawing from this forum. I apologize for everything. Kartazion.
  11. Which last line of text? Can you clarify it? Which arguments? Not me. I confess. If my minds is it weak I have no excuse. We can't all be smart like you.
  12. It's intellectual dishonesty coming from you. Only you mentioned the word mediation and you wrote it in your post. Prove me wrong. Try to be more careful with the terms and with the logic when you're trying to make fine points.
  13. @Area54 Sorry, I was wrong. That was not what I meant as a sentence. I will answer you correctly. Thank you Ok.
  14. Simply It's because I never call anything mediation. Where did you get that word from? Have you confused it with the word premeditated? Indeed the word was badly chosen.
  15. A creator. Some call him/her/it God. Are you confused a bit there? Can you give me a source of your claim, namely the fact that evolution depends on hazard? It is indeed the aim of my main question to find out; if we can determine it by science or not. The chemical bond? What does it make of the chemical bond its particularity if it is not that particles bound or agglomerated as I indicated above? That's what I'm saying. It is not our choices that make the universe work this way. The same. It is indeed the origin of these laws of immutable physics that ultimately lead us to be able to make choices in life. The universe does not make a choice. It follows the laws of physics. So where does the origin of our free will come from? The universe is only the visible part of what constitutes us. And it is thanks to nuclear fusion (among other things) that we subsist here and now. Hazardous of hazard (chance).
  16. Simply because some of these photons reach us here on earth to interact with the electron of matter encountered. Yes the famous fluid mechanics. Can you give me the relevant example which adds the more? It is not our choices that make the universe work this way. I want to make it clear that the universe follows the rules that it owns, and AFAIK only living beings are endowed with this free will. The universe does not give itself the choice and follows the stages of evolution until us. It is these stages of evolution that I suspect to be not hazardous.
  17. But the emitted photon can arrive at a final destination location in a premeditated manner. But just a random gas expansion. They are neither more nor less than elementary particles agglomerated in motion. I didn't mean to say that we can defy the laws of physics. But just that we are arbitrary in our decisions. We have the choice to run or not.
  18. We agree that when the sun shines, and by its nuclear fusion, photons are released and are distributed in space. Do you think for a moment that such and such a photon goes in such and such a direction how? Randomly? Or in a controlled way? Biology structures particles according to the genetic code of DNA and cannot do otherwise. Yet the result in the form of living or organism beings is however endowed with intelligence and can decide what he wants to do as he wishes and without there being any rules and laws. How do you explain that?
  19. But during a nuclear fusion for example, the distribution is done, and in terms of radiation, in a random or structured way? Intelligence is being able to choose between several results where each of these paths are of course subject to the same laws. Erratum. I spoke of radiation. I should rather speak of particle emission like the neutron for example.
  20. I answer as a novice. I do not see any constraint in this request. Just the part 'Science should be able to determine' in 'Science is able to determine'. Because science could, and this in my opinion, determine whether the underlying and canonical functioning of the universe is randomly distributed or not. I saw that we were talking about a God particle linked to a book related to the Higgs boson.
  21. I didn't do it on purpose. No evidence. But it is because of what you said that there are : Zero candies in the Standard Model. Did I answer correctly?
  22. I suspected it a little. That's why I found it a little strange this jelly story. No. Not too much. On the other hand as swansont puts it, we don't need a balls of jelly to make the Standard Model of our universe work. So I gave you the number n°* for this balls of jello story. It's because I'm used to talking about quantum or nuclear physics. That why. * guess . I will surely say nonsense, but would that not be there a form of 'intelligence' in the behavior of the Higgs boson?
  23. A mysterious world that would make no sense to us. A quantum world, with bursts of energy which structures the particles thanks to the directing fields, intelligent or not. The very structure of the universe what. A world that would be capable of generating billions of stars with phenomenal quantities of energy. Can you imagine for a moment the size of our universe? If so, then how much balls of jello would it take to generate such a universe?
  24. I understand. The theory of everything at its limits. Apparently I'm not the only one to ask myself the question. Thanks for the source. You wanted to ask me if in the case that the universe emanates from intelligence, what would it be like?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.