Theredbarron

Is the moons surface in a vacuum or is it technically not a vacuum?

By interior are you referring to the core?

Is that due to the composition?

Is mars atmosphere that low due to the density of it? nevermind

Nope just trying to answer some questions is all Where can I get the good information from?

Why is it that people on here ignore that the moon has an atmosphere? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmosphere_of_the_Moon its says .3 npa which from all sources that converts to 4 psi just for easy comparison. Our atmosphere is at 14.7 psi. Mars atmosphere is at 14.6 psi. It may not be one just like ours but it is one. sorry that was 4 to the -14 Whats collecting the gasses that it does have is what I want to know Mars is half the size of earth and has half the surface speed of earth approximately and has almost the same amount of psi as earth. Why isn't there a relationship between the atmospheres and the size and speed of the planets including the moon? Conveniently about the same amount of hrs in a day on mars as it is here.

Compared to the suggestive gods we would be. I'm trying to come at religion as more of a scientific point of view as to why it would be around.

Religion and science are both formed in the same way. The past and details that it shows us are were are suspicions arose from. Religion used the writings on the walls that man has left behind even though its all about perception of that information. Science used more logic from the earths past that it has shown us. Humankind through out history declares sightings of extraterrestrials. Humans evolved from various places on earth. With DNA under massive pressure then having electricity from the earth passing trough multiple times during earths life changing the structure to match the surrounding environment giving animals and humans distinct features and connections. This makes me understand why primates are still around. Wouldn't it suggest that its possible to have multiple creators or supreme intellectual beings to have logically placed DNA around or in earth to have these actions set in motion? Even though it may have been unpredictable as to how we came about or did they restart the test every once in awhile with an extinction level event to place DNA back in the dirt? It could be simply evolution and random chance of DNA on this planet.

Most probable is 1 clearly. I will return with a video as soon as I get a real wheel cut to eliminate vibrations primarily. Its not going to be soon.

Thank you for this. Please could you give me an example of a distinction that I can try to discern? This would be much appreciated. Im trying not to just cut down everything. These are actual question's in comparison to the norm that I am not quite understanding as for the theory that I have goes. It may not be much to anyone here but that just means its doesn't matter as much either way. The tests though I am down for what ever is demonstrable that can tell me what this really is. I figured since my gadget is shows something happening I should be able to rule out with the same. Would it mean anything if it did?

ok so paper in the chamber. I'm assuming confetti cut up or smaller pieces? Its going to take me some time to get all the pieces together and do this just fyi. I know it doesn't sound like it right now but yes in a sense as to the differentials between the points and how it effects across the vacuum of space. This is just what I found as a commonality between my own personal observations and gravity. Thank you You have been spot on. I wont No I do not expect it to. I do however want to know if its going to instead of assuming it. I have a hard time believing in things. All I have ever seen from belief is war, violence and ignorance. I know its sounds dumb but that's my reality here. I dont know if this makes any sense but the very first post I put says its not about if I'm creating gravity its about has anyone else created it. This is where I'm very bad a verbiage. I have never started chat on a forum before. It was meant to be an intro. What I meant was that has anyone created a force like this one? I have nothing to reference to. Look at all the video crap out there and reference whats this one is doing. I came here to try find good documents that I can compare to what this device is doing. Its not a planet so it wont act like one in other words. This is how wild theory's like mine happen. that's why just math isn't helping me much on this.

Let me get to some of this. I dont have all the answers. I do however have a brain injury so my apologies for not instantly answering the questions about gravity. I'm not trying to compare it to that part of your theory right now. all my ramblings are to try to paint the picture. If I need to clarify what I mean then I will but straight forward questions at my level of ability to translate to your terminology is what I'm going to answer until common ground on what is being tested relates to the question. very rudimentary for now.

Not sure yet! I haven't tested it. No. It not just rotation that does it. Its moving at all

What questions? All of the post show statements. Im may have missed this. No. My version pushes the space around the wheel out first as to expand the matter or existence that is in there with centrifugal force. once the centrifugal force cannot exert and more in that space then it becomes a low density area for everything else to fill. That's what I'm doing with the wheel presumably. Im only using the air to then collect said matter. It will attracted lighter objects first. Then heavier as it collects whatever. However, The speed of matter determines the strength of the effect. Much like electrical pressure. The current in refrence to electricity would be the amount of inertia the collected mass has. Voltage goes up and risistance stays the same then current goes up. Speed of mass goes up and mass stays the same then inertia goes up. mass would then be the resistance

Did anyone measure that 90% So how can you tell me your correct? This is why it is debatable

Yes in idea of the shape but I made it more aggressive then the surface of earth. The movement of those masses on earth, all of them will create a draft. Picture it without the atmosphere and every imperfection on the surface making this draft. At this point it would be like the moon but much faster and more draft. Sometime during the planets birth gasses were closes enough to get collected by theses drafts. Accumulating that amount of air and then moving it with the mass on earth. Thus becoming apart of the gravitational field as per my version. The moon isn't spinning fast enough to collect an atmosphere. The field can only get as big as the effect of the total mass in motion that is crating this effect. The reason why it looks like it going thru matter is because that object itself is creating the gravity. like the smoke at the bottom of the vacuum chamber so the smoke will stay at the bottom even though the vacuum wants to pick it up. The chamber itself is moving at the surface speed. There Nothing that is sitting still that's creating gravity.

So there is no way possible that air can cause a draft as its being drug around the atmosphere. The air from the north pole is moving toward the equator due to the draft of the larger and faster moving mass of air and including the drafting from all the imperfections on the surface that are accumulating this force that are also moving very fast. The imperfections is where the gravity starts to generate. As the air from the surrounding environment is collected or created during is own creation add to the generation of gravity. The air form the north pole that is moving meets the air form the equator a imperfect places around the earth the we call the Jetstream. That's where the draft from the hotter air around the equator is creating. Some of the air does escape the atmosphere due to nature being imperfect and those particular molecules are being influence by the force pulling them outward which is the vacuum of space reacting to the edge of our gravitational field or our atmosphere. This is just a rough guess based on my understanding of physics. Why does mine sound so much simpler and all the laws that everyone outside of the science community has to abide to? you still haven't actually answered why newtons laws are be negate in that document. Using your theory that cant be measured aka tested to disprove results is like me using mine to say your completely wrong without even testing it. Im using only the very basics to explain mine. rule number one of speculations forum "1. Speculations must be backed up by evidence or some sort of proof. If your speculation is untestable, or you don't give us evidence (or a prediction that is testable), your thread will be moved to the Trash Can. If you expect any scientific input, you need to provide a case that science can measure." This would fall under your theory as the understanding on who that's supposed to go. If it doesn't lift it at that level of intensity it doesn't disprove or debunk anything. rule 15 for a so ive got a new theory rules. "15. All theories are of limited scope. Just because a theory does not address some point you want it to does not automatically mean it's wrong." and "16. Not understanding a concept, or discovering that it's counterintuitive, does not make it wrong. Nature is under no obligation to behave the way you want it to."

Everything is creating gravity as it moves. including the surface of the moon. because its the moon and I haven't been there so its all I got.

refer back to one of the videos on the smoke thing.

Did you see the picture of the mountain? the mountain is what moving the air so the mountain is what's generating the Gravity by use of air. Let me ask you this why doesn't the air leave our atmosphere at the equator? Newton's first law states that gravity would have to increase for an order for it to stay in the same path due to the centrifugal forces increasing. Like how the space shuttle leaves our atmosphere closer to the equator they say it's centrifugal forces or is it just that large mass of air moving at a thousand miles per hour behind it giving it a Tailwind. Let me guess Tailwinds don't exist either. Oh and just another note the atmospheric pressure all around the world is approximately the same just like our weight. So yes gravity is going to look approximately the same all around the world. Someone tell me why Newton's first and third law does not apply to this link. https://image.gsfc.nasa.gov/poetry/ask/a11511.html The moons surface is rotating at a rate of approximately 10 miles per hour. Its moving through space at 2,288 mph. Stand by the moon as it passes you and tell me what you would feel. It is in a gravity assist sling shot around earth using newtons first law as logic. just liked the moons gravity effecting our planet. ours does the same back to the moon like newtons 3rd law as logic. The gravity on the moon as far as it has been measured is about 16.5% of earths. That would be the average around the whole planet since there is only one answer form NASA for that. Other wise I cannot answer that because I have not measured my calculations yet. This is the understanding and not hard core facts that im presenting. Everything in motion is included in creating gravity I did this yesterday. I'm not going to make another wheel. I'm going straight to the vacuum chamber. I would like to point out the gap from the wheel to the motor. It would appear to be a chamber of some sort. The vacuum chamber will not be that close to the wheel at all. I'm going to ignite a smoke bomb inside the camber then if the smoke is lifted, it is in support of my argument. if it does not then this part is over. I can use that force for something else if I can perfect it. This video is just to show the difference with and without the wheel.

How would you suggest the vacuum chamber setup should go? I was thinking of epoxy and some polycarbonate with the cnc version of the wheel sealed up in there. I wasn't sure if I should have the motor in there or not. I can plug the holes for the air cooling part of the motor from both ends. As for the chamber pretty much shaped strong enough to hold a vacuum and glued together is what I was going to go with. and the wheel at a distance from the sides of the chamber as be out in the open Is that the sound I make when I do this. and this

Saying its false without testing it is not scrutiny. Its opinion. You yourself even said. That make you not qualified enough to say what it is.

I have already been blown up so keep watching.

This is speculations forum. Not fact