Jump to content

Theredbarron

Senior Members
  • Posts

    274
  • Joined

Everything posted by Theredbarron

  1. Yes and no. The vacuum builds a lot of pressure from the outlet. I attempted to plug it because mine is plugged. I could not. But I do get what you are saying in that it will still hold the paper. That's given that the pump doesn't recirculate once the other end is actually capped. Almost similar and they will be due to what I'm trying to explain. I will come up with the vacuum chamber setup one as soon as I can.
  2. So let me get this straight. Just so I can understand. Your saying that gravity doesn't change from here to the moon but just that little bit correct? If that were true then we would weight about the same. One document that was posted earlier states that the gravity decreases from the north pole to the equator within even grater % then your saying. for both of those statements to be true you would have to weight about the same. That's what I got out of that. This link states that the slight change in gravity for that much smaller distance then from the moon makes a noticeable change in weight. https://image.gsfc.nasa.gov/poetry/ask/a11511.html we are orbiting the sun. I proposed that it is a gravity assist sling shot. That same logic applies to whats orbiting our planet. That mass of atmosphere is moving at over 1000 mph around. Blow air by you at 1000 mph and tell me it wont move you when you are not in the direct path but just close. This device isn't even close to creating that. The surface of my wheel is only moving at approximately 3/4 of a mile per minute at 25% which is where I ran it. The moon is sling shot gravity assist orbiting as well. Your weight is so low on the moon because its rotating at approximately 10mph. It doesn't have oxygen because none is trapped in its field. Notice the comparisons of speed to weight. My question that I have for the moon is how much do you weight on the back surface or forward surface or trailing surface all at the same time at any one instance. Its not the same everywhere on earth even if its just barely different. Black is the wheel cutaway looking from top down. Blue is the direction of travel of the wheel. green is the resistance from the atmosphere another words the air or whatever that's surrounding it. Right now its earths pressure. Red is what the green will do as it passes the wheel. Orange is what is happening inside at the edge of the void once you have reach certain speeds dependent upon the environmental factors. Like vacuum or pressure. Grey is where the venturi effect is created. This is where something would orbit. brown is the gravitational pull
  3. No just as it sits and changing out the wheel in the video and running again to see if the effects change. This is to see if static electricity is what's causing it. I do want to know if this would work if I spun this would it create static electricity? I wanted to test the static electricity one because it would be easier to perform that test before making a whole new wheel and everything.
  4. I am going to get a wheel made that doesn't vibrate one of these days to eliminate the vibrations? Are you claiming that there's no gaseous matter past 62 miles above our head? This is what I refer to as air so what I mean is gaseous matter it doesn't matter what it's made of.
  5. Would it make sense to put a different wheel in that does not support my theory like a perfect sphere? Would that still create static electricity? Also my other question would be if I were keep everything the same and run it with a different wheel that does not support my theory and it does not pull the paper towel to it, would that mean that the force is relative to my wheel?
  6. Maybe I should take a science class so I can learn to ignore suggestions in a speculations forum
  7. I'm claiming that the 300 miles of air above our heads is whats holding us down due to the effect that is happening at the edge of our atmosphere. take this mountain for example. see how the air is appearing as if the mountain is moving. That's because it is. if that mountain passed you at the speed that it is traveling right now and you were standing still. By still I mean not moving with the surface. The speed differential would be 1kmph or more depending on the speed of the surface where the mountain is. You can feel a semi pass you at 60mph. Why wouldn't you feel the mountain in that same case? Electro magnetism is invisible. We can create it. So why not go down this road and see. The differential from space to our atmosphere is where this is happening. I do have calculations. You just wont accept them so I'm not going to show them. If you cant answer my questions explaining why instead of just saying its not possible then you dont have an answer is what I'm getting at. I dont want whatever math you are doing. This is purely basic. If the math is something that I can use not to only reason it but actionable information then I will use that. I'm not that far into developing a theory yet to try and use equations to explain. I have to have something concrete to go off of to use my calculations. Not just an assumption . If this is so simply not gravity then tell me why with demonstrable evidence. I'm going to bring demonstrable evidence. Documents that clearly demonstrate what your saying or video of examples. You can use things like what I just used. I'm still developing this theory so I dont have all the answers. I came here to try to find some other logic that I can use to try to eliminate things. Like the static charge that I'm going to test. As far as my theory goes this is what I'm going to call it till I'm shown otherwise because by my theory's definition this would be considered gravity. This does not mean that I'm saying its fact. Its a Theory. Can you solve math without even understanding the equation? How can you solve this without even understand the equation? simply dismissing it is not solving it. You dont have to solve it. I just wanted to know what you think it might be. Not what you think it isnt
  8. Tell me this. If I were to change out the wheel with one that does not support my theory, would that make it definitive that my wheel is generating if the effects go away? How is gravity not directional? Its is whats holding us to earth right? Dont give me this crap about roundness and how up is down in some areas. In relation to earth all gravity points to the center. In relation to my wheel all air is moving to the center. I used the tube so you can see it pull the air in. Again air is matter and if its close to the gravitational field it will attract to it. It uses the matter that is between the force and the paper towel to attract it. This is what my theory proposes. Like a string made of air
  9. The reaction of forces with gravity? Have you seen smoke in a vacuum chamber on earth? It moves to the bottom. My wheel being above in the chamber should pull the smoke up into the area where it would act as an atmosphere around the wheel. If you use the same measurements of gravity that the measurements are based upon the theory and not the basic laws of physic which have been stand for longer then your logic that you are trying to pass off as fact. I am fixed on testing this. I have to be able to remake it to demonstrate that is not or it is by eliminating what some people have suggested. It takes more then a day to do that. What I would like to know is how are you measuring gravity? The difference is that the matter itself moving is what is creating it is where this is going. it is invisible because air is invisible and air can create an attraction with the venturi effect. Are you going to tell me the carburetors dont work now. Air can pull air even when its not enclosed in a tube or anything else. They also made sprayer that use air to spray liquid with this same effect. This exact effect is what I'm predicting in happening on the rim from our atmosphere with the large very fast moving mass of air around the equator. That amount of air passing you at those speeds will definitely pull you in. Just like the attraction that happens when a train or a bus or a semi passes you except all the time and a whole lot faster. Why wouldn't that cause an attraction?
  10. You cant answer the questions with fact is why you say that. Changing one of the most proven laws of physics to prove your explanation is just like me say this test that I came up with based upon my theory is how its proved. Instead of me doing that I used the basic laws of physics. Use the basic laws to explain gravity because my version does and came up with a demonstration just like newtons third law did when it was figured out. Your arguing the demo and not the theory. You say gravity cant be created but then how can it exist? In order for existence to happen something has to be created which is the part where its made. No matter what the existence is it has to be created first otherwise none of us would be here.
  11. did you want me to use the paper instead of smoke because it would still mean the same thing if it pulls either the paper or the smoke within a vacuum chamber even if it doesn't have a tube on it. according to your theory of gravity should have tracked every possible molecule that's involved in that vacuum chamber so if this does that then it proves both correct because that's the whole point of gravity it attracts matter. Unless you can disprove that gravity attracts matter or prove to me what my wheel inside the tube is creating when I used demonstrable physics that has been proven by the basic laws of physics like Newton's third law that I referenced earlier and debunked their entire logic with basic physics. That fact that I linked that someone used cannot debunk Newton's third law just because they explain something. Newton's third law is able to be demonstrated. If that link that I sent you is true then Newton's third law is not. Talk your way out of that
  12. I'm using examples in space on how planets interact with each other based upon my theory. The reference to creating gravity is how the planets create gravity. Reread what I posted earlier then it might make sense as to why I'm referencing that
  13. Yea but it does have to do with my theory that's were I went with it just for examples. I'm not very good at explaining things to were you, as more involved in the science study area I'm assuming" would be able to understand. Is more of a translation issue or where to even begin. The demo thing is to demonstrate it. That doesn't make the device the theory. The planet assist is going to be very subtle as to maintain a speed or it will fly off the tracks. I think that newtons first law still applies. If you say its possible for the slingshot gravity assist work in space then that would be supporting my claim. That's how I see it.
  14. As the planet passes the sun closes going toward the sun gravitational pull accelerating it enough for it to swing slowing due to the suns pull from behind then doing it again. The sun accelerates the earth as it comes to it were the closer part of the orbital path is due to the sun and the earths own gravity. as it passes the sun it then now is getting pulled at an angle from behind slowing it enough for it to swing back around to the other close spot in the orbit. This is what I'm speculating just based upon my own.
  15. I argue this because I used my theory to explain Saturn's rings. The loose orbing matter will gradually move to the fastest moving area of the planet due to the higher gravitational pull. Newtons third law applies here. That planet is moving at 21k mph at the surface approximately. It happens to the planets moving faster at the surface then most other planets base on my theory.
  16. I meant to answer the vacuum question. What I hope to see is that it will lift the smoke up into is field. To continue So I thought if I spun that chamber that I was discussing with the hole to the outside of the rotation. 1 rotation per second would be considered 1k cubic ft displacement calculated like a pump.1 in 1 out. But the only thing about it is that it would not pump because there's nothing going in. That's not very useful to use so it would get ignored. I wondered how far I could expand what was in the space that is moving before it becomes a depression due to the venturi that is happening at the opening. It whistle with a hole shaped like a circle at first. With this wheel since I had to try to make that same effect but with metal it became a money thing. It was either make it by hand just to see if its worth going any further to answer my questions. Yes mine has a lot to do with the air at first but again as you can tell this is not a high quality piece of crap. Its a rough cut. That what I mean by the start of it all. Im not going to take this to the bank until something actually comes from it. Not that its going to but still. The wheel is doing what I thought it would. Yes the air will be squeezed in there. Yes it will stop accumulating air once the strength of the wheels design and environmental variable allow it to. I dont know if you caught that last video but the full sheet of paper weighs more then the paper towel. My thought is that inside the bigger diameter tube is a larger airspace. With that airspace comes matter. If that matter gets attracted to the wheel as it spins and begins to move with it, it would now become part of the field. What I mean there is that the air would move perpendicular to the tube causing a draft like effect between the surface of the tube and the air since the air is rotating with the wheel at this time. Thus making the field bigger. Just like our planet is doing on the edge of our atmosphere. It looks like our planet is sling shotting around the sun without any other forces effectively interrupting it. Another part would be like the core of the planet. Its assumed for the most part but the best that mankind has. If it was spinning very fast like a star or something observed in space moving all that gas inside there it would hold our crust together like a vacuum seal once solid began to form around it during its creation. The gravity part in the core would be along the solid part of mantle because all the gas and loose liquid matter would be creating and atmosphere not unlike how ours is but made up of hot gasses and other stuff. And at higher pressures due to the temps and speed. Now it has 2 fields in a planet. one in the core and one from the surface. If the material in the crust is a conductor and or magnets which there is. The liquid matter, including metals, from the mantle and possible core would be passing by it at a high rate of speed. Now its generating a magnetic field I dont know if the basic are even being tested. Just maybe the perception of it. The surface of the equator is moving faster the poles as to generate more centrifugal force. Since for every action there is an equal but opposite reaction, the increase in the centrifugal force would require gravity to increase to compensate in order for you to weight even close to the same. The force at the pole is measure at a speed of 1 rotation per day. That's not a lot of force. Our planet is oblate. It shows that the centrifugal force is much larger then the poles at the equator. So doesn't it make sense that if you increase one you would have to increase another in order to keep the almost exact same value. nature is not perfect. its natural. That tiny difference from the north pole to the equator cannot explain or quantify the immense difference in centrifugal force at the equator without gravity increase to compensate. This is what was presented to me. https://image.gsfc.nasa.gov/poetry/ask/a11511.html How can newtons third law not apply in that case?
  17. Its kind of like a twisting and squeezing effect and it would look like this I would imagine but a lot faster at this size and in our atmosphere something a little like this if you could take a still shot.
  18. Sort of. On earth it does. That why I want to do a vacuum tube one. Air defined in my theory is actually a state of density in comparison to all things existing. Picture solid at the top being positive and below vacuum being negative. It goes solid liquid gas 0 vacuum neg. Most dense to least. What I figured this from is that in space if you opened an airlock chamber that is 1k cubic foot and, just for easy of calculation, it took space 1 second to balance the chamber. it would be 1k cubic ft per second. Hold that thought A venturi will cause a drag and pull effect correct? I wondered what would happened if you moved that chamber in a manner to create a venturi. Does it just whistle was what I asked. No its doesn't. I made one and it did whistle then it exploded. So I thought I should make one from metal just to be sure its not going to come apart. What I had trouble with was what shape it should be to do this. That's when I started looking for similarities between planets and trying to determine what would happen to the matter that is in the chamber. Wouldn't it just keep expanding to a point to where it becomes a depression is what I thought. Keep in mind I was one day just kidding in saying I wish I could solve gravity. I was working on something else when it dawned on me. Semi trailer drafting. A straight line can be curved correct? So if a semi can draft us a 60 what could a bunch of mountains and air and buildings and water and people do at 1k mph? How is it sounding so far? isn't this speculations. its not like your the one to qualify anyone for it anyways. I dont even know what that is because it doesn't matter to me
  19. Mine Yours if no attraction from the outside if no attration from the outside then it confirms what I haven't then not gravity even said yet. if both statements are true then how can any be false not just because They are in fact both true is the point and this one is not made to be able to do that even if yours says it cant be made. This is what im challenging. I cant until the other easy stuff is out of the way. Is that too much to ask
  20. Yes I did. My camera sucks and it doesn't realy show it well. I want to put it in a see-through vacuum chamber with a balanced wheel of course and then use smoke. Would that be a better way? Yes by the way everyone is taught that would be correct. Its exactly what I'm saying just at certain intensities is why it still supports what we have been taught. I am not suggesting that mine is creating the intensity of what we can observe in our space. If I were to create a wheel strong enough that is accurately made it may do just what you want due to its ability to generate a strong field. Electromagnetism does the same thing. Not all electromagnetic fields pierce the materials that it normally would if the intensity was too low. That's the resistance. like the tube as of right now is the resistance. I cannot perform that test because its not at that stage yet. Like I've said this is just the start whether it is or its not.
  21. Here's another view of a version I made before.
  22. Okay. This is good stuff. Yours is a little more complicated then static. What can I do to eliminate this? Would reducing the vibrations increase or decrease this effect? Or would stopping or increasing the reflection change what its doing? I have plans on getting a wheel cnc but it would be nice to know this stuff before I spend the money. I dont know if that makes any sense. I pretty much have nothing to lose but a little amount of cash.
  23. okay I will be back with a better demo
  24. I can do this but first you would need to understand what my theory is. My theory argues the logic on who gravity pulls through matter instead mine shows how the matter is creating it. I get that for example earths gravity and how its holding us here and it looks like it pierces matter. I understand that this would prove you correct in that it doesn't hold or move the paper towel with the end capped but it would at the same time demonstrate my theory to be correct as well. Mine says the opposite in that manner unless the paper towell is move with the field in which case this one is moving 6k rpm or more.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.