Bluenoise

Pssst they don't actually exist you know....

You're making the mistake of basing the ligitamacy of their work on associations. Not to mention an association that has nothing to do with genetics or research, a qualifying body for IT professionals, don't make me laugh. That has nothing to do with genetics research, might as well have just said they all had yearly passes to disney world. Which is a respectable ammusment park. The work should speak for itself. Forget associations. Why not just read it, see if anything they say is actually backed up or endures scrutiny. Then make up your own mind and let that be the end of it. Thats what I've done, and these are the factors that tell me it's bullshit. 1) No evidence whatsoever for anything they claim. 2) Deliberate contorsion of language and missuse of words including invention of countless new phrases with the obvious goal of confusing the reader. 3) All references of their own work are from meetings and completely unaccessible. Thus NO PUBLICATIONS. 4) All quality referenced material gives no support for their theories. 5) All their work hinges on the existance of a so called PLR spectroscopy which as far as I can tell doesn't exist outside of their documents. Plus this spectroscopy is supposed to measure quantum interactions that don't exist outside of their documents. Does this not sound completely obsurd to you???? There is a reason why you don't hear about this stuff. Because when they try to submit it to a respectable journal that just get laughed at. That's all I'm going to say. If you're going to be fooled by their missuse of words and ideas that's your concern not anyone elses.

LSD damages your chromosomes....

Easiest method yet! this is the one to do.

It should be possible if you use a balloon with varrying thickness of rubber along it's surface. Have it thickest in the center of the sides with a thickness gradient that drops toowards where you want the edges to be.

Umm none know so far. Carbon seems to be very special in the way it bonds. Silicon being the most simular compound doesn't even come close. It seems life will be carbon based if it's out there. Personally I see this as far more necessary than water. I could imagine life in an organic solvent, but not life without carbon. If there was life without carbon it'd most surley be very drastically different from life as we know it. Oh yeah to continue my last post, the reason why we see the part of the spectrum that we do is that these wave lenghts correspond to those that can cause appropriate energy transitions in organic molecules that allow for vision. Meaning that all energy of higher intensity (i.e. UV) breaks chemical bonds making it useless to us. And energy of lower intensity (i.e. IR) only causes slight kinetic vibrations. Everything inbetween (the visible spectrum) is able to cause electronic transitions in organic molecules that can be used to see. Now some organisms can see slighly farther than us up and down the energy scale but this is rather limited.

Wow what did you sit on today? Actually there is a very good reason why we can only see a small part of the spectrum.

I'd be more worried about scratching up your gums.

No. No that's not right at all. Okay here's the quick version. Bacterial creates lactic acid pH goes down. Flouride binds to enamel in teeth making the enamel itself less basic, and thus more tolerant to acidic conditions. Umm yeah brushing isn't forceful enough to physically remove the enamel to a degree that anyone would notice.

I'd not waste my time till you see some of this published in an acclaimed journal. If this had the slightest truth to it it would be ground breaking and you'd hear about it.

Oh by the way you're wrong there. They don't do any research in genetics. Just skim over their references and you'll see that they contain no research articles on the topic they talk about. The only couple research articles they have in their refereces are on unrelated topics. They just make this stuff up as they go. There is no factual evidence to support this whatsoever. Meaning it's not science. Everything they write comes right out of their ass. They just use big and inappropriate words to confuse their reader.

Wow, I can't believe whatever moron wrote all that wasted that much time of their lives. One word to describe it. BULLSHIT

bui bowling under the influence

Was there supposed to be a joke there? or some humor? Hey I got a joke. There were poeple walking and some were going to school and there was this guy selling hot dogs. Oh and someone got hit by a car ha ha ha .

I was born interested in science.

I was going to reply but i'd rather not want anymore time with this...

Well the major in-vivo problem with retroviruses is that they intergrate DNA randomly into the genome. So there is a strong possibility of disrupting a tumor suppressor gene or even overactivating a pro-oncogene. If one were to find a way to target specific sequences with a high-fidelity for retrovirus use one would have a major break through on their hands. Adenoviruses have much better targetting ability but then again they have their own slew of pitfalls. The cause of overreproducing cells causing them to become cancerous (as zero-wing suggested) is more of an ex-vivo problem. I.E. taking the cells out multiplying them and then reintroducing them. There is a high propensity for transformation of animals in culture. It's a very complicated area right now with lots of research to be done to solve the many many problems with every technique. And there are alot of techniques, it just not one really stands out yet as the solution.

Well you could have a chamber with some presurized gas in it that is allowed to expand when someone opens the can. That would cool it imensly and as long as you used something inert there would be no toxic side effects. You just need to set it up so that it doesn't send pop spraying all over the place or freeze someones fingers. But hey that's what engineers are for right???

Or as always when in doubt just do mass spec. Though you should have a very pure sample

I think a slight increase in metabolism from digestion reving up probably is the biggest cause of heating up from eating alot of food. But yeah for small amounts of cheese or chocolate it's probably hormonal.

This is a mistake, a positive enthalpy does not mean a drop in entropy. And yes the equation applies to photosynthesis. Okay you're forgetting about the increase in entropy that is caused by dispersal of solar radiation as heat/kentic movement. So while creation of glucose from water and CO2 has a decrease in entropy as well as an increase in enthalpy there is a greater increase in entropy that results from dispersal of solar radiation as heat, and this is what drives the process forward. Hope that clears it up. basically when a photo hits the photsynthesis apparatus it causes a conformational change, alot of this change is dispersed as heat when the molecules relax, satisfying entropy. And most of the remainder of it is funneled into energy for the plant; which is uses to produce glucose etc.

Oh they don't really check. You just sign up. I had a student subscription, and I never had to show any proff.