Itoero

That's not evidence. The bible is also a book. You said that all religion teaches karma...that's another baseless claim.

You think that because you don't understand my point...again. This is logic thinking based on the 'fact' that We are animals and evolution is a continuous process. Science, religion, politics and technology did not just appear when we were homo sapiens. Those properties are/were present in the entire animal kingdom but evolved differently. If you deny this then you deny evolution. Science evolves via unscientific beliefs. When unscientific beliefs are proven they become science. For example. The holographic principle, the many worlds interpret, wormholes....are not proven, they concern unscientific beliefs. When they are proven, they become science. You can believe that something works, but you have to experimentally show it really works...you turn an unscientific belief into science. Religion concerns with unscientific beliefs. Therefor unscientific beliefs can evolve into religion. When a coyote has a bad experience with a wolf, he will ignore/hide from other wolves, based on one bad experience. Something like this causes what we call 'racism'.

I was once in Prince Rupert (Canada)and I was waiting for a bus that would take me to a boat which would bring me to the Airport. I tied my dog's leash around a pole but he pulled itself free and ran away. An Indian looking guy saw what happened and offered to help. He drove me around to look for my dog. We did not find her. When we were back at the bus stop, my dog came back. I of course missed the bus. The guy then drove me and my dog to a small dock where another small boat took me to the airport. I don't know whether he helped me because he was religious(for his karma), but I'm pretty sure he did.

Any evidence for this? Do you know all religions?

Science, religion, racism, technology, politics...are evolutionary traits which are present in many animals. Because they evolved and developed differently it looks like those are properties of humans. The fact that we are animals should be sufficient evidence for this. -Many species use some kind of tools.(technology) -When an animal has a bad experience with someone from an other species, he will (to increase his chance to survive) threat all animals from that species as the one he had a bad experience with, the same....this causes racism. -Racism and other unscientific beliefs can lead to religion. Science evolves via unscientific beliefs. -Animals teach/learn how to use tools, how to hunt/gather food, what to eat...animals teach/learn science. -Animals which live in group have often a hierarchy...which leads to politics. What do you think of this?

Evolution shows we are automatons. A quote from Richard Dawkins: " We are survival machines robot vehicles blindly programmed to preserve the selfish molecules known as genes. This is a truth which still fills me with astonishment."

Consciousness is a mix of intelligence and memory(stored knowledge). Our intelligence allows us to store knowledge/experience and allows the stored knowledge to 'interact'. When a baby gets born he has only intelligence and the only thing that enters his mind is knowledge/experience. So consciousness has to be a property that arises from the interacting of stored knowledge The intelligence is then the motherboard and the memory is the RAM. Your eyes are then the pc-screen and your graphic card contains the optic nerves. Someone with a strong graphic memory has a high RAM on its graphic card.

I'm totally against global warming! I often open my fridge and freezer to cool things down.

Einstein had a huge amount of imagination. Imagination decides how far your knowledge brings you. Don't mistake craziness for imagination. Imagination can lead to craziness.

Many religions teach a form of karma. This can cause good behavior.

Then you did a bad blowjob. I'm sorry, I had to say that.

According to the Copenhagen interpretation, physical systems generally do not have definite properties prior to being measured and the act of measurement affects the system. This is just like the wave-particle duality and like Heisenberg's uncertainty.

You keep repeating the same nonsense. -Bells theorem debunks theories concerning hidden variables not the complete absence of hidden variables. Don't you understand this? Bells inequalities appear to imply that the correlations then found cannot possibly be reconciled with a deterministic hidden variable theory. In the hidden variable theories that one then has in mind, the quantum particles are, somehow, accompanied by classical hidden variables that decide ahead of time what the outcome of any of the possible measurements will be. Clearly, Bell has shown that such hidden variable theories are unrealistic." =>Do you deny this? -The idea that the bells theorem shows ultimate reality is speculation, the Idea's of G 't Hooft are speculation. The difference is that the idea's of G 't Hooft can explain many things like the info-paradox in black holes, insta-collapse of entanglement, the absence of observable causality, the fact that we observe probability and not 100% randomness... And of course this is not proven, if it was proven then the Holographic principle would be 'proven'. -Einstein did write an unpublished hidden variable theory. You should do some research before you post your nonsense. https://arxiv.org/ftp/quant-ph/papers/0401/0401017.pdf -Why do you think I don't understand t hooft and the holographic principle? Can you show the comments I gave which makes you think that? -That's not true, I believe in the holographic principle because it fit's with my arguments and because it explains many things. Your are an IGNORANT LIAR

You have a funny brain This is the second time you say the irony field goes of the charts and you still don't want to back up your claims...probably because you can't. Your behavior should not be allowed on a science forum.

Why is it ironic? Give EXAMPLES

Yes and what is so ironic? Can you give examples?

You apparently continue with your lack of understanding. Will you plz stop posting replies?

Of course his model is not perfect...it's the first one. It's not proven that Bell's theorem shows ultimate reality. The idea that the nature of the universe is indeterministic is an unscientific belief. A model (like bell's theorem) needs to be improven or disproven...science needs to evolve...that's how you keep real science. It's pretty normal his idea's do not enjoy widespread support...our science can't explain the randomness yet. Hooft wrote the paper 'Quantum Gravity as a Dissipative Deterministic System' several months before he wan the Nobel prize. Hoott is the first one that proposed the Holographic principle. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holographic_principle Einstein created a hidden variable theory but he did not publish it. If Einstein knew about the holographic principle (information loss) then perhaps bell's theorem would not exist. What do you think about the holographic principle? It explains many things like the info-paradox in wormholes, insta-collapse of entanglement, the absence of observable causality, the fact that we observe probability and not 100% randomness... I made that argumentum ad hominem before because your questions are imo irrelevant.

Why do I get a -1 for that?

That's true but I mean it's understandable because it's applicable to the macroscopic or observable world. 'understanding' is a wrong word....it's easy to imagine.

hehe A man turns into a hulk when he's angry or his heartrate goes up. But why do you want to be superman when all people are dead?

Why do you ask to be a superman? All people are dead... I would first ask to be the hulk, the second Djinn I would ask to be iron man.

According to the Copenhagen interpretation, physical systems generally do not have definite properties prior to being measured, and quantum mechanics can only predict the probabilities that measurements will produce certain results. The act of measurement affects the system, causing the set of probabilities to reduce to only one of the possible values immediately after the measurement. This feature is known as wave function collapse. This is imo an easy to understand interpretation which is applicable to the macroscopic or observable world. This probably causes its popularity.

I would wish for world peace

Then why don't you do that? What's the point of this thread?