Speculations

Mercury advanced perihelion could be also equally due to attraction gravity: Orbit of Mercury is roulette around the Sun, .. on a particular side of the sun, perihelion of Mercury is advanced which the Newton law on gravitation cannot explain. Until Dr. Einstein showed/proved that it was due to the curvature of space. But the attraction gravity of Newton may also be able to explain the advanced perihelion. It could be that on the roulette orbit, the side of Mercury, which is more positive is tilted and facing equally the more positive side of the Sun thus, Mercury is advanced/pushed farther on perihelion or it could be the negative of Mercury is tilted/facing t…

Suggested attraction gravity of Newton experiment, re- ball-shaped magnet Material: A bar magnet 4 inches in length and 1 ½ inch equal four sides (width). Said magnet bar with equal positive and negative in length. Cut a cube, either on positive end or negative end, and grind to make such cube perfect circle. There should be the same magnetism all over the grinded ball-shaped magnet. Magnetism and gravity are fundamentally the same, the making of the opposite law, re with equal positive and negative property. . Jsaldea12 7.10.09.

What is spacetime gravity of Dr. Einstein? The familiar illustration of Dr. Einstein spacetime gravity is that of trampoline and object dropped therein creating a dip, the heaver the object, the deeper the dip .until the deepest dip is reached: a collapsed object becomes a black hole. It appears something is wrong with this illustration. It is impossible in actual outer space. Dr. Einstein, in later years, said, “I cannot anymore recognize my relativity…”.? The spacetime gravity of Dr. Einstein appears to be better illustrated as a half floating rotating ball on body of water that creates circular ripples or curves on body of water. But as electro-magne…

Nah! Since you meant "rest mass" your statement was basically correct. I used the term "basically" because I assume you had something very specific in mind when you said it, e.g. that the proper mass of a photon is zero. There are instances where one could say that "light" (as in multiple photons) has non-zero rest mass. For example: when a physicist says that light has zero “rest mass” they are referring to the fact that since the energy of light is related to its momentum by the expression E = pc the norm of the photon's 4-momentum equal to zero. However if you had an ideal gas of photons, e.g. the cosmic microwave background radiation, then it can be said that…

Attached is an exceedingly schematic diagram, indicating how a Wormhole might possibly be created, between the curved Spacetimes, of the Gravity Wells, of two massive objects (stars, say). From within the Gravity Well of one star, a "Space Warper" would compact matter, to create a Singularity of exceedingly curved Space Time. This new -- and completely man-made -- Gravity Well would "branch off" through Hyperspace, until it encountered the Gravity Well of the second star. Presumably, once the patch of Spacetime surrounding the "Space Warper" came into contact with a patch of Spacetime in the second star's Gravity Well, they could "merge", allowing the "Space Warp…

GRAND UNIFIED THEORY (For some thirty years, Eminent Scientist, Dr. Albert Einstein had tried to unify the four fundamental forces of the universe, namely: gravity, electro-magnetism, Strong nuclear force, and weak nuclear force. Dr. Stephen Hawking and many other prominent scientists have followed, went further to conceive version, “Theory of Everything”. But, so far, all attempts to unify the four fundamental forces have been unsuccessful.. The treatise below appears strongly, finally, to have the four forces unified into one... Please read particularly the second paragraph of revised article). This article has been posted in physforum, category – physics gen…

Oh the relevence of relativity. If we have an infinite space any portion would be infinitesmal by proportion. We have an infinite space and a proportionate point. If there were no point no space could 'arise' and without space there is no point, so these are simultaneous. The space is everywhere and the point is anywhere, but it does exist as fundamentally relative. Only anywhere and everywhere are possible for no relative portion exists, and this can be seen as two 'places' without a possible variant. So, there is a constant finite because the 'places' are reliant. Thus the assertion of space derives a finite value. Thank you, I hope you '…

Studying other theory's is fine but to insist that people align themselves with a theory that you believe in prior to posting is contrary to the science doctrine. If everyone always did what you suggest we'd still be thinking the sun revolves around the earth. I for one believe that the Big Bang was not a singular event and that matter continues to flood into our universe driving inflation.

Man-made nuclear bomb: ONE best evidence of Big Bang. (In 1964, radio astronomers Amo Penzias and Robert Wilson detected cosmic microwave background radiation covering entire outer space, believed remnant of Big Bang, below another d iscovery appears exceptionally good) . Atom is 99.999999999999% space., meaning its components, re-electrons, protons, neutrons, quarks, are all that spacious. If atom is the size of 20 basketballs rolled into one, the size of its nucleus is like a grain of sand, and if the size of the nucleus is 20 basketballs rolled into one, the size of the innermost quark is like a grain of sand. From such hollow nucl…

Equilibrum of Positive to Negative of Atom The Law of Opposite states that there should be equilibrium of positive to negative, meaning the mass of positive to negative should be in equilibrium, just like water seeking its own level. That requirement of equilibrium is applicable to micro as it is in macro. In macro solar system, the sun, as nucleus, has equilibrium positive and negative property, in like manner, earth and all other satellites, re- mars, venus, etc., each satellite , has equal mass of positive and negative property, in keeping with the Law of Opposite.. In micro atom solar system, the nucleus and electrons, should, each should have equilibrium m…

WHY IS GRAVITY ALL ATTRACTION TOWARD EARTH? (Ever since that momentous time Adam’s apple fell on the lap of napping Newton, “simpleton” gravity has become intriguing, more intriguing, that up to now, gravity is ranked one of the eleven greatest (if not the greatest) unanswered questions in physics, according to Dr. Michael Turner, Ph. D. and many other physicists. Yes, why does the apple falls downward toward the center of Earth and not up to outer space? The following almost four decades of sleuthing finally dissects, like surgical knife, and unlocks the true nature and behavior of gravity). Two phenomena, working together as one, are responsible “why gravit…

But what about the deeper questions like: 1. Is there a God which created the universe or started the big bang or do we live in a completely atheistic (or Godless) universe controlled by blind mechanical forces? 2. Also is there life after death or is death the final end?

A thought experiment: Charles Babbage is thought of as the inventor of computers with his difference engine etc. This was a mechanical device. Modern computers are electronic rather than mechanical and work by having electrons flow through CPUs and other electronic devices. Is it theoretically possible to replicate the workings of a computer using mechanics?

Hi: I have speculative neuroscience question. Let’s say that the PSTSNs in my body – and the ADFNs supplying them -- don’t have any refractory period or any other protections against hyper-excitability. PSTSN = Peripheral Somatic Tactile Sensory Nerve ADFN = A-Delta-Fiber-Nociceptor Non-ADFN = Sensory-receptor/nerve-ending that is not an ADFN or the portion of a nerve that is attached to such a sensory-receptor/nerve-ending ADFNPSTSN = A-Delta-Fiber-Nociceptor supplying a PSTSN PSTSNNon-ADFN = A non-ADFN supplying a PSTSN Tactile = Pertaining only to sense of touch [including temperature, pressure, pain, tickle, vibrations, movement, etc.]…

Hello this is my very first post here, so I thought I would play it safe and put this subject in Pseudoscience and Speculations. Anyway, I like to design stuff particualrly spacecraft. I designed this particular space ship several years ago. I would just like to ask the question; given how conventional space travel is progressing do you think it would be possible to build a ship capable of travelling fast enought to explore our solar system within a ten year mission scedule. And is it plausable that such a ship could be designed and built within the next 50 to 75 years. Hope you find the images I have designed interesting. Many thanks JC

Structure of the photon he ones that have ear to hear, listen and the ones that have understanding to understand, understand : In the structure of the photon is find the answer to the unification of gravity and electromagnetism. This enunciate create the base to transform electromagnetic force into gravitational force. If the photon gets disintegrated, taking it to its minimum expression, it will be shown that the following number of sub-particles will be liberated: 1 graviton (colorless) + 4 neutrinos (red color) + 16 quarks (green color) + 16 anti-quarks (blue color) = 37 sub-particle *** Images were replaced by a moderator after the OP requested them re…

So, I was watching "Cosmic Holes" last night, and while discussing the nature of time and gravity, they talked about how clocks on earth run slower than clocks higher in the atmosphere - explaining how a gravitational field effects time. One scientist referred to the occupants in a rocket blasting through the atmosphere into space as "going into the future, faster" than those of us on the ground. So, my question is, if this was more exaggerated, to the point we could actually notice with the unaided eye...wouldn't they appear to be moving at a faster rate? Would those of us on the ground perceive them as moving even faster? Or slower? Or nothing at all? …

I was wondering do we have a space based early warning system for tracking asteroids. I know that they have radio telescopes equipped with high powered digital cameras which scan the skies for danger, but how do they compensate for atmosphere distortion with these cameras. I’m currently working on my latest idea, a deep space radio telescope. There are a few uses for this deep space radio telescope. To Track objects entering our solar system, to determine if they’re a threat. To peer deeper into the cosmos, monitor background radiation. To relay communication with any deep space vessels, thus preventing signal degradation. You could position up to ten of the…

Nothing by itself is nothing. Nothing at one moment and nothing at the next moment in time are still nothing but now nothing is relative to something existing elsewhere. When there is time there is space, and where there is a next moment in time there is next space. This would mean every point in the universe is the same point , they act independantly because every frame of reference that we consider a point is HERE/NOW relative to that point. (i.e. the only fundamental point is nothingness) So is it possible that time makes space, that space makes energy, that energy makes matter and matter makes you and me? Every point is HERE/NOW, there is no pa…

Im not sure if this classifies as true biology, however I read somewhere that it might be possible that metallic life forms exist in some parts of the universe. I was just wondering what other people thought.

I joined this forum just to post my theorem (or is it theorum) Anywho, the Axiom is gravity makes things all "sticky". Some say it's clear evidence this planet sucks, in reality all planets do and their moons as well. If the moon has a gravitational pull, and the earth does. And any other astrological body that its capable of detecting gravity on also does. One must assume, everything has a gravitational pull of some sort. Which I believe negates any possibility of "Graviton's" It's is a logical postulate to assume that gravity is directly related to mass (not to be confused with weight). (m = W/g) Sew.....one might deduce a theoretical (not to mention tot…

The big bang is only the beginning of our one and only percieved universe. While this may be true I began to think deeper into this region of science known as astrology, and came out with a theoretical understanding. What if the vastly small atom that blew up creating our universe was one of millions? I believe in infinancy to the fullest extent in that there may not have only been just one atom that blew up creating the many galaxies, stars, and solar systems we know of today... I believe that there were many atoms that blew up creating their own little universes, and there still are these little atoms blowing up creating their own universes. And as our universe may be v…

This post is an explanation of my understanding to how Einstein's relativity theory works in conjunction with time. Allow us for a minute to reflect upon Einstein's theory of relativity. E=mc². Einstein's theory states that energy equals the product of mass times the speed of light squared. From this very equation Einstein was able to theorize that time is irrelevant.. Irrelevant to everything that exists in it. Allow me to shed some light here. To my understanding (this is simply just my thought process in the matter, hopefully posting this will get me some feedback) since light remains at a constant speed we can conclude that it is essentially a constant figure …

Why do all the speculations concerning the possibility of 'time travel' presume a non-dynamic staring point, when there is no such thing? Any point on Terra is moving. It is rotating in relation to the planet's axis. It is orbiting our sun. Our sun is orbiting the center of the Milky Way, the Milky Way is moving closer to Andromena, and our glactic cluster as a whole is moving toward a point behind the Virgo Cluster. The total sum of these velocities might be something like 1/35 C. Wouldn't it stand to reason that if you were to travel 35 seconds into the past, you would reappear into empty space approx. 186,000 miles ahead of where you were, and if you stayed…

Hey. This site contains unclear theory with experiments. But Idea is briliant. What do you think about it? Paradox of classical mechanics