[Tres Juicy]

michel123456, on 19 January 2012 - 05:24 PM, said:

And you don't want to know what PIPA (πίπα) means in modern Greek.

Pipe?

[michel123456]

Tres Juicy, on 19 January 2012 - 05:28 PM, said:

Pipe?

In English, no.

Insert πεολειχία in a translator.

This post has been edited by michel123456: 19 January 2012 - 05:37 PM

[Tres Juicy]

michel123456, on 19 January 2012 - 05:32 PM, said:

In English, no.

Insert πεολειχία in a translator.

[jeskill]

Isn't "πεολειχία" spelled like "peoleichia" in English? How is that anywhere near "PIPA"?

[zapatos]

michel123456, on 19 January 2012 - 05:32 PM, said:

In English, no.

Insert πεολειχία in a translator.

So in other words, you are saying PIPA sucks.

[michel123456]

jeskill, on 19 January 2012 - 06:58 PM, said:

Isn't "πεολειχία" spelled like "peoleichia" in English? How is that anywhere near "PIPA"?

peoleichia yes. (pe-o-lee-hee-aa) is the right word, from "peos" meaning "penis" and "leichia" meaning "licking". Pipa is one of the multiple words used to mean blow job. In French "pipe" (peep) is a smoking pipe, which means that frenchies (& I suppose all latins) & greek suck up where british blow. It is a noticeable cultural difference.

Now in a single thread you have learned 4 words of modern greek absolutely indispensable for your next vacation on the islands.

This post has been edited by michel123456: 20 January 2012 - 04:46 PM

[StringJunky]

It's been put off for now:

Lamar Smith, the chief sponsor of SOPA, said on Friday that he is pulling the bill “until there is wider agreement on a solution.”

“I have heard from the critics and I take seriously their concerns regarding proposed legislation to address the problem of online piracy,” Smith (R-Texas) said. “It is clear that we need to revisit the approach on how best to address the problem of foreign thieves that steal and sell American inventions and products.”

Smith also released the following statement on Friday:

“We need to revisit the approach on how best to address the problem of foreign thieves that steal and sell American inventions and products. “The problem of online piracy is too big to ignore. American intellectual property industries provide 19 million high-paying jobs and account for more than 60% of U.S. exports. The theft of America’s intellectual property costs the U.S. economy more than $100 billion annually and results in the loss of thousands of American jobs. Congress cannot stand by and do nothing while American innovators and job creators are under attack.”

http://mashable.com/...ith-pulls-bill/

This post has been edited by StringJunky: 20 January 2012 - 08:50 PM

[michel123456]

StringJunky, on 20 January 2012 - 08:46 PM, said:

It's been put off for now:

Lamar Smith, the chief sponsor of SOPA, said on Friday that he is pulling the bill “until there is wider agreement on a solution.”

“I have heard from the critics and I take seriously their concerns regarding proposed legislation to address the problem of online piracy,” Smith (R-Texas) said. “It is clear that we need to revisit the approach on how best to address the problem of foreign thieves that steal and sell American inventions and products.”

Smith also released the following statement on Friday:

“We need to revisit the approach on how best to address the problem of foreign thieves that steal and sell American inventions and products. “The problem of online piracy is too big to ignore. American intellectual property industries provide 19 million high-paying jobs and account for more than 60% of U.S. exports. The theft of America’s intellectual property costs the U.S. economy more than $100 billion annually and results in the loss of thousands of American jobs. Congress cannot stand by and do nothing while American innovators and job creators are under attack.”


http://mashable.com/...ith-pulls-bill/

So it is argued that piracy is the cause for "the loss of thousands of American jobs". I am not sure.
My country is actually under high pressure to liberate what are called "closed professions", like lawyers, pharmacists, architects & engineers, all professions that work under corporatism. Corporatism is condamned as a scheme opposed to free economy. "Liberation" of "closed professions" and the entrance in free economy is supposed to offer more jobs and reduce costs. I don't understand how the professional protection of the media market (that's what's all about) will provide more jobs. One thing for sure, it will not reduce the cost. IMHO the goal is to increase the cost, the number of jobs is absolutely of no importance, it is an excuse.

[JohnStu]

SOPA, doens't matter what you call it, is basically the thing China uses.

[Cap'n Refsmmat]

What makes you say that?