Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

The Dolphin was not a fish


  • Please log in to reply
18 replies to this topic

#1 Kikis

Kikis

    Quark

  • Members
  • 20 posts
  • LocationMakassar

Posted 20 March 2011 - 01:06 AM

Posted Image I ever floor the statement about Dolphin and whale was not a fish but its classified in sea mamals. Many audiences was not believed, they need a proved . I tried my best to prove it but i had shortage with concept and theory and also evolution picture. I need help for some material, and picture that could explain much about dolphin evolution from its ancestor till recent species.
  • 0

#2 Horza2002

Horza2002

    Baryon

  • Senior Members
  • 680 posts
  • LocationLeamington Spa

Posted 20 March 2011 - 01:56 AM

There are lots of other aspects of their physiology that are easier to exaplin why they are mammals. One obvious one is that they don't posses gills. Both dolphins and whales need to come to the surface to breath using lungs and then they hold their breath while swimming. Granted bluw whales can hold their breath for a VERY long gitme with a single gulp of air. Another exampel would be that they give birth to their young in a very similiar way to land mammals. Fish tend to lay eggs that eventually hatch to release the young...although not all fish do this.
  • 0

#3 TonyMcC

TonyMcC

    Quark

  • Senior Members
  • 808 posts
  • LocationLeicester, UK

Posted 20 March 2011 - 10:54 AM

Whales have vestigial legs supporting the theory that in their evolutionary past they were land animals. http://en.wikipedia....giality#Animals
  • 0


#4 michel123456

michel123456

    Molecule

  • Senior Members
  • 4,255 posts

Posted 20 March 2011 - 03:03 PM

You can make a very simple experiment:
Take a whale into your left hand and with your right hand keep its head under water for two and a half hour. If the whale is dead, it is not a fish.
  • 0

Michel what have you done?


#5 steevey

steevey

    Molecule

  • Senior Members
  • 634 posts

Posted 21 March 2011 - 11:48 PM

Dolphins evolved from a wolf-like animal and you can see the evidence of this because dolphins and whales have vestigial hip bones which through evolution have shrunk over time. There's also the fact that both dolphins and wolves move their spine up and down, rather than like fish and sharks which move their spin or spin-like structure left and right.

Edited by steevey, 21 March 2011 - 11:49 PM.

  • 0

#6 lemur

lemur

    Primate

  • Senior Members
  • 2,844 posts

Posted 22 March 2011 - 02:18 AM

There are lots of other aspects of their physiology that are easier to exaplin why they are mammals. One obvious one is that they don't posses gills. Both dolphins and whales need to come to the surface to breath using lungs and then they hold their breath while swimming. Granted bluw whales can hold their breath for a VERY long gitme with a single gulp of air. Another exampel would be that they give birth to their young in a very similiar way to land mammals. Fish tend to lay eggs that eventually hatch to release the young...although not all fish do this.

They also nurse their young. Whale milk is supposedly similar in texture to cottage cheese.
  • 0

#7 jimmydasaint

jimmydasaint

    Atom

  • Senior Members
  • 679 posts
  • LocationFarnham Royal, Bucks

Posted 22 March 2011 - 10:31 AM

Dolphins evolved from a wolf-like animal and you can see the evidence of this because dolphins and whales have vestigial hip bones which through evolution have shrunk over time. There's also the fact that both dolphins and wolves move their spine up and down, rather than like fish and sharks which move their spin or spin-like structure left and right.


Do you have any papers to refer to, for further information please? That is quite a large claim to make.
  • 0
88.2% of Statistics are made up on the spot
-- Vic Reeves

#8 Blahah

Blahah

    Baryon

  • Senior Members
  • 170 posts
  • LocationLondon, UK

Posted 24 March 2011 - 05:45 PM

Do you have any papers to refer to, for further information please? That is quite a large claim to make.


steevey might be referring to Mesonychidae, an extinct family of land mammals which was once thought to be the ancestor of many modern mammal lineages including cetaceans (whales and dolphins), and which existed from around 65 to 35 million years ago. Those things really looked like wolves. The studies were all based on dentition (tooth anatomy), but this has recently been discredited somewhat. Now it is thought that cetaceans branched off from other mammals in the artiodactyl lineage (along with the hippo).

However, there were actually some wolf-like cetaceans before the non-aquatic ones all died out, for example Pakicetus (see pic below) and Ichtyolestes. There was a 2001 paper in Nature about it: Skeletons of terrestrial cetaceans and the relationship of whales to artiodactyls (Thewissen et al.). It's important to note that the 'wolf like' ancestor of dolphins and whales was not actually a wolf, so directly drawing a comparison between whales and modern wolves is a bit confusing. The spine idea is a good one though: fish flex the spine laterally (side to side) whilst most mammals flex it dorso-ventrally (up and down).

See the Wikipedia page on evolution of cetaceans for more info.

Posted Image

Pakicetus attocki skeleton (early land cetacean).

Edited by Blahah, 24 March 2011 - 05:56 PM.

  • 1

If I helped, feel free to click the + button ----->


#9 The Alpha

The Alpha

    Lepton

  • Members
  • 6 posts
  • LocationNottingham

Posted 31 March 2011 - 12:32 PM

  • They have no gills (must come up to the surface for air.
  • They internally fertilise during sex.
  • They give birth to live young.
  • They have vestigial legs.
No fish have these qualities. Both Dolphins and Whales have all of these qualities.


  • 0

#10 SMF

SMF

    Molecule

  • Senior Members
  • 421 posts

Posted 31 March 2011 - 03:02 PM

Endothermic
Have mammary glands
Have hair

Edited by SMF, 31 March 2011 - 03:03 PM.

  • 0

#11 Swedgen

Swedgen

    Quark

  • Members
  • 14 posts
  • LocationMelbourne, Australia

Posted 27 May 2011 - 01:46 AM

  • They have no gills (must come up to the surface for air.
  • They internally fertilise during sex.
  • They give birth to live young.
  • They have vestigial legs.
No fish have these qualities. Both Dolphins and Whales have all of these qualities.



Yep, and as mentioned already they suckle their young with milk, and have hair (around the blowholes, at least in whales).

Jerry Coyne's excellent Why Evolution is True has a good section on the evolution of whales.
  • 0

#12 ajb

ajb

    Physics Expert

  • Resident Experts
  • 6,789 posts
  • LocationWarsaw, Poland

Posted 27 May 2011 - 09:51 AM

You can make a very simple experiment:
Take a whale into your left hand and with your right hand keep its head under water for two and a half hour. If the whale is dead, it is not a fish.


To throw a spanner into the works here, don't certain species of lung fish also drown if not allowed to surface for air? (I am also wondering about species of snakehead?)
  • 0
"In physics you don't have to go around making trouble for yourself - nature does it for you" Frank Wilczek.


Mathematical Ramblings.

#13 CharonY

CharonY

    Biology Expert

  • Resident Experts
  • 5,091 posts
  • Locationsomewhere in the Americas.

Posted 27 May 2011 - 08:16 PM

Indeed. I think that most lungfishes actually have atrophied gills and would eventually drown (at least from what little I remember). Which demonstrates that single traits are often insufficient to make precise phylogenetic distinctions, especially over large distances.

Edited by CharonY, 27 May 2011 - 08:17 PM.

  • 0

#14 Moontanman

Moontanman

    Genius

  • Senior Members
  • 8,294 posts
  • LocationSouth Eastern North Carolina

Posted 28 May 2011 - 01:54 AM

There are also fish that feed their young a milk like substance as well, I'm not sure there is one thing you can point to and say this makes a dolphin a mammal and not a fish because no fish does this but no fish has all the mammalian characteristics a dolphin does nor does a dolphin have all the characteristics a fish does. On a necropsy table the mammal-ness becomes obvious as does the fishiness of a fish, also it should be trivial to show that dolphins are mammals genetically by comparing their genomes. Just like it is possible to show that Humans are genetically mammals and not reptiles it should be possible to show that dolphins are genetically mammals and not fish.
  • 0
Life is the poetry of the Universe
Love is the poetry of life

You do not possess belief, belief possesses you...

I'm always open to new ideas, I just don't let them crawl into my skull and take a dump... 

“The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, but illusion of knowledge.” — Stephen Hawking

"In every country and in every age the priest has been hostile to liberty; he is always in allegiance to the despot, abetting his abuses in return for protection of his own." ~ thomas jefferson

Check out my YouTube channel here.



If I was helpful, let me know by clicking the [+] sign ->

#15 Arete

Arete

    Biology Expert

  • Resident Experts
  • 1,004 posts
  • LocationUSA

Posted 30 May 2011 - 07:12 PM

Phenotypic evidence, such as endothermy, lungs rather than gills, vestigial legs, hair, lack of scales, placental young etc and so on strongly suggest that cetaceans (whales & dolphins) are mammals and genetic evidence evidence is in support :

- Maureen A. O'Leary and Jonathan H. Geisler (1999) The Position of Cetacea within Mammalia: Phylogenetic Analysis of Morphological Data from Extinct and Extant Taxa Systematic Biology Vol. 48, No. 3 (Sep., 1999), pp. 455-490
- Springer MS, Stanhope MJ, Madsen O, de Jong WW (2004) Molecules consolidate the placental mammal tree. Trends Ecol Evolut 19:430–438

The process by which they came to physically resemble fish is called convergent evolution, whereby similar environmental conditions select for similar traits in organisms with different ancestors, which leads to distantly related organisms having similar appearances.

Edited by Arete, 30 May 2011 - 07:37 PM.

  • 0

#16 mooeypoo

mooeypoo

    Oh look, Pwnies!

  • Moderators
  • 5,700 posts
  • LocationNoo Yoak

Posted 9 June 2011 - 08:34 PM

there are no such things as a vestigal organs

!

Moderator Note

This is a mainstream science forum, where mainstream science is discussed. Empty claims are not allowed, let alone one that tries to hijack a thread to promote your own pet theory or unscientific notion of reality. Don't do it again.




"No vestigial organs" topic split into its own topic here.
  • 0

If I was helpful, let me know by clicking the [up arrow] sign ^^

No trees were harmed in the creation of this post.
But billions of electrons, photons, and electromagnetic waves were terribly inconvenienced during its transmission.

 

Adventures in Algorithms http://moriel.smarterthanthat.com

Advocating Science http://smarterthanthat.com


#17 xxSilverPhinxx

xxSilverPhinxx

    Quark

  • Senior Members
  • 31 posts
  • LocationIn the land of the Bleating People...

Posted 2 July 2011 - 09:47 PM

Dolphins have the fish, reptilian and higher mammalian (like us) parts in their brains.
  • 0
...from the ashes of vengeance...

#18 shellibranch

shellibranch

    Lepton

  • Members
  • 9 posts

Posted 8 July 2011 - 07:30 AM

Dolphin was not a fish. haha. Interesting topic.
  • 0

#19 Pageone03

Pageone03

    Lepton

  • Members
  • 2 posts

Posted 15 July 2011 - 07:43 AM

yup,, that was so nice,, all I know b4 that i dolphins is mammal

yup,, that was so nice,, all I know b4 that i dolphins is mammal
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users