Science Forums: Woman control theory - Science Forums

Jump to content

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net! We welcome science discussion at all levels — from beginners to researchers, covering topics from biology to computer science, and much more. Registration is fast and free, and allows you to post on the forums, so register now and join the discussions!
  
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help  registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.

  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Create a ScienceForums.Net Blog!
Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse
  • 6 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Woman control theory Rate Topic: ----- (You voted 3)

#41 Guest_SS 3 Goku251_*

Quote

Originally posted by the GardenGnome
Women still fight, and not all men agree to war. So it depends on the person.


My therory on this issue is that a woman controls a certain man in different situations. Such as reproduction. The women can some how control the out come of certain perdicaments.

:zzz: :lame: :bs: :spam:
0

#42 RED FIRE COW 


Meson
Now I love woman. But I think they are insane lol :bravo:
I like Chocobos!
0

#43 NavajoEverclear 


Molecule
the way to end war is to teach both sexes love and loyalty toward their mate, there by raising family as the sole concern in life. If everyone in the world could learn this there would be no war. But you could not make everyone in the world understand this and so even if you could convert a majority of the world to this lifestyle, the rebels would cause havoc, obligating men to defend their families and become caught in war.
0

#44 Sayonara³ 


Icon
Doomy doom ♫

Quote

Originally posted by NavajoEverclear
the way to end war is to teach both sexes love and loyalty toward their mate, there by raising family as the sole concern in life. If everyone in the world could learn this there would be no war.
What utter twaddle.

That's not going to stop the endless politicking and it certainly won't remove the need of cultures to expand or defend their ideologies.
0

#45 kether 


Quark
:-p
Golem never acheive divinity over creator. (well at least in stories they dont)
Every dog has his day in this purrrfect world.. The earth maybe a bitch but she knows without the sun (son) she will wither and die. omnipotent she is not, and slave she never was.
the language is a virus...it has nothing to do with us if one can grasp it
0

#46 Guest_ben+Jen_*

ok this is a total load of bullshit!!! Woman couldnt live without men. The male part of this species has developed the major part of modern sociaty, Men and woman are equal, this issue shouldnt be appearing ps Woman dont understand the offside rule RETARDS :-p
0

#47 admiral_ju00 


Protist
There is such a thing as parthenogenesis.
Also, there's recently been a few studies done with rodents that didn't require sperm for them to produce offsprings.

While these tests may still be unethical in human trials, it may be possible to come up with similar results. So you're not entirely right there.

But what you're said in the above post, does come from male dominance point of view.
0

#48 kether 


Quark

ben+Jen said:

ok this is a total load of bullshit!!! Woman couldnt live without men. The male part of this species has developed the major part of modern sociaty, Men and woman are equal, this issue shouldnt be appearing ps Woman dont understand the offside rule RETARDS :-p


Concrete in your head...ha ha
0

#49 admiral_ju00 


Protist

kether said:

Concrete in your head...ha ha


Heh, so much for my attempt at a civil debunking, but this works as well :D
0

#50 Leison 


Baryon
I dont think eliminating males from the world will end the war.Above all are "Men" responsible for war? It is often said 3 Ws(Women,wine,wealth) are root of every war.Although if the "male" species is removed war will be lead by women as it the last solution of the complex quarrel and quarrel is omnipresent.

Moreover,The world will end if any one of male or female is removed completely. Science can never challenge NATURE. [B]
0

#51 Aardvark 


Primate

Quote

Moreover,The world will end if any one of male or female is removed completely. Science can never challenge NATURE. [B]


How do you come to that conclusion? The world might be a very wierd place with only women, but it could be theoretically possible, asexual reproduction, or IVF could be used. I don't see how the world would end.

Also, it seems that science spends quite a lot of its time challenging nature. I personally give thanks for such challenges as antibiotics and central heating. Natural diseases and natural cold wet weather should be challenged on a continual basis.
Do it to them before they do it to you
0

#52 kether 


Quark

Quote

I dont think eliminating males from the world will end the war.Above all are "Men" responsible for war? It is often said 3 Ws(Women,wine,wealth) are root of every war.Although if the "male" species is removed war will be lead by women as it the last solution of the complex quarrel and quarrel is omnipresent.

Moreover,The world will end if any one of male or female is removed completely. Science can never challenge NATURE. [B]



Does this mean if everyone became gay it would cause extinction of our race?
Designer babies are possible. Cloning also possible. In nature is it not the strongest that survive...Women have FOUGHT for power and percieved equality, claiming centuries of oppression etc..Nothing is for nothing. Everything has a price.. The eon of Horus is upon us. The real armageddon.
When reality shit hits the fan, the "Joans of Arcs" will be screaming once again for their white wedding dresses..Sorry girls its the death of love. How many bosses do you know who would give you your old job back after you walked out on them, kicking up a fuss in the process..Its mans cake and he will eat it...Ha ha ha..
Ramona.A.Stone.. Bloody golem :-p
0

#53 Tesseract 


Protist
It would end war but only because I cant imagine an all woman army sacrificing their lives like men do. :D
I renounce your reality and substitute my own!

Socrates (400 b.c)- "The unexamined life is not
worth living."
0

#54 Daymare17 


Meson
Some examples of warmongering women are:

Condoleeza Rice
Madeleine Albright

War is not caused by men, but by opposing interests between the capitalist classes of each nation. If you abolish borders (which belong in a museum) then you abolish war too. This is just a silly sexist prejudice.
0

#55 LucidDreamer 


Protist

Quote

Some examples of warmongering women are:

Condoleeza Rice
Madeleine Albright

War is not caused by men, but by opposing interests between the capitalist classes of each nation. If you abolish borders (which belong in a museum) then you abolish war too.

I don't think it's quite that simple. Europe is in the process right now of unification and its not easy to get many countries with their own distinct cultures, beliefs, religions, histories, and politics to come together.

Even if all the countries of the world did come together there is still civil war.
0

#56 Verusamore 


Baryon

Quote

War is not caused by men

Daymare ,
Hit the nail right on the :mad: but sure made me :-) to know someone has got an idea that " BLAMING OTHER PEOPLE " for problems isn't a fact to resolve matters . .

Quote

by opposing interests between the capitalist classes

Blame Money if anyone wants to point fingers .

People tend to whine on & on & on about money more than anything else but still want to live with , why ? it is because they see it as some sought of importance in there life as much as they are themselves which is why they can't see the problem.

I think that wars are caused by Disillusioned People with appetites for money , as the propensity for conflict is human , anyone with an appetite for money will certainly conflict there own emotional wellbeing & material matter ,while this in turn confuses there own sense of reality which then eventually drive people to violence or insanity when these conflictions fail them .

Ami is Right about that women tend to be more emotional , this will add amungst other things also ( exacerbating on things ), I'm not sure being emotional can be seen as a good thing though , especially towards others in society as people tend use that against you and is most likely the reason why women are upset about men in todays world of affairs which is quite evident on divorce rates ,sexual assaults,domestic violence and other quarrels between.

Love works ,don't get me wrong but that only works more one a 1 on 1 intimate level .

I'm going to begin rambling on here so.... bare with me..

I'm not pointing any fingers to whom is to blame because money is the root, but we know by neighbour the character of person who supports the "Growing" economy by buying into large corporate products (making the rich richer) or the other person who buys into well-known labels which took several asian children to make in shabby sweatshops earning not more than an hourly wage of macdonalds worker per week(making the poor ,poorer ) ( and we thought they had low wages ) . These economical conflicts between people and nation can result to violence ( Rich Vs Poor )

I work in a small business with my mother , the regular customers we get are loyal , altruist and friendly who I greatly appreciate , the other customers which come in who don't fit this are just hungry and pigs , partial of when it comes to attitude .
These are the customers who buy into chains and companies and who I consider selfish as they tend to quote on ' how long ' without knowledge that I already told them how long and that only I and mother can cater for so many people at one time.

Dr Seuss could teach the world 101 ways to self-control but know would listen to him anyway .
If confusion is the first step to knowledge, I must be a genius.
0

#57 Sayonara³ 


Icon
Doomy doom ♫

Daymare17 said:

War is not caused by men, but by opposing interests between the capitalist classes of each nation.

And war in animal species?
The Dictionary is not a technical resource.
0

#58 Verusamore 


Baryon
Sayonarai ,
We have quite far evolved in thinking since the primordial ages but there are rogues amungst us who still carry that fighting gene which I hope now to God are either sterile or gay .

This is partly the reason why I think the reason for having an a female for an American president-ress would be interesting to see .
If confusion is the first step to knowledge, I must be a genius.
0

#59 Verusamore 


Baryon
I say this ' fighting gene ' as opposed to our supposed sophistication , as where fighting is not normally something that is seen to be a sophisticated trait to thinkers .
If confusion is the first step to knowledge, I must be a genius.
0

#60 Sayonara³ 


Icon
Doomy doom ♫
You are both complicating the issue.

War is brought about by absolutely and inevitably unavoidable selective pressures, both in intra~ and interspecific interactions between populations.

Gender is pretty much irrelevant.


And why would you hope people with any particular gene are gay? It's not like gay people don't ever pass on their genes (although this is a matter for another thread entirely, of which there are several. Just thought it was a curious thing to say).
The Dictionary is not a technical resource.
0

Share this topic:


  • 6 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users