Roger Dynamic Motion Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 Hello Every one. I'm working on a model that would demonstrate the veracity of the string Theory . Please your answer will be very much appreciated, if Yes why and if No Why Thanks . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KipIngram Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 As far as I'm aware electrons are subject only to the Coulomb force and gravity. Given that they are both inverse square forces and the Coulomb force is much stronger regardless of radii, electrons would always repel each other. (I'm guessing that was your question - the title sort of chopped it off) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Dynamic Motion Posted June 4, 2017 Author Share Posted June 4, 2017 As far as I'm aware electrons are subject only to the Coulomb force and gravity. Given that they are both inverse square forces and the Coulomb force is much stronger regardless of radii, electrons would always repel each other. (I'm guessing that was your question - the title sort of chopped it off) yes thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sensei Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 (edited) As far as I'm aware electrons are subject only to the Coulomb force and gravity. There are also electron capture, beta decay minus, double beta decay minus, interaction with (anti)neutrinos (neutral current).. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_interaction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electroweak_interaction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutral_current Edited June 4, 2017 by Sensei Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Dynamic Motion Posted June 4, 2017 Author Share Posted June 4, 2017 There are also electron capture, beta decay minus, double beta decay minus, interaction with (anti)neutrinos..Can you elaborate please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sensei Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 Can you elaborate please. I gave examples of weak force/electroweak interactions. Read above links. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Dynamic Motion Posted June 4, 2017 Author Share Posted June 4, 2017 I gave examples of weak force/electroweak interactions. Read above links. thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 Can you elaborate please. I'm not sure how you are going to develop a model related to string theory if you don't even understand the real basic schoolboy-level stuff ... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Dynamic Motion Posted June 4, 2017 Author Share Posted June 4, 2017 (edited) I'm not sure how you are going to develop a model related to string theory if you don't even understand the real basic schoolboy-level stuff ...This is a not a quiz Strange an don't get smart you could be confronted in not with you know but what you understand . This is a not a quiz Strange and don't get smart you could be confronted in not with you know but what you understand . Edited June 4, 2017 by Roger Dynamic Motion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 This is a not a quiz Strange an don't get smart you could be confronted in not with you know but what you understand . Crumble fluttock wimble dosh, cravick blump toots. (That makes about as much sense as your comment.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StringJunky Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 (edited) I'm not sure how you are going to develop a model related to string theory if you don't even understand the real basic schoolboy-level stuff ... I never understood how one can expect to invent that which one does not understand and yet we see it everyday. Edited June 4, 2017 by StringJunky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Dynamic Motion Posted June 4, 2017 Author Share Posted June 4, 2017 (edited) I never understood how one can expect to invent that which one does not understand and yet we see it everyday. insults are never constructive for the bane super-flue. Crumble fluttock wimble dosh, cravick blump toots. (That makes about as much sense as your comment.) insults are never constructive for the bane super-flue. I never understood how one can expect to invent that which one does not understand and yet we see it everyday. not met for you Sorry! Edited June 4, 2017 by Roger Dynamic Motion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 ! Moderator Note OK, that's enough. The question has been answered. No need to have the discussion degrade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts