Sensei

You always come up with this nonsense when you're out of arguments. So let's look at the LLM statistics. ChatGPT 64.5%, Google Gemini 21.5%. 64.5+21.5=86% of the LLM worldwide market. Grok 3%. 86+3=89%. Are you all okay? I don't understand what you wrote here. I didn't write about any hypothetical things. Datacenter = the place where these LLM questions are processed. If ChatGPT (64.5% of the world market) runs on Azure, and Microsoft claims that Azure is 100% renewable, this means that 64.5% of the world's LLM runs on renewable energy. https://datacenters.microsoft.com/globe/powering-sustainable-transformation/ Same with Google Gemini. So 86% of LLMs are on renewable energy. Repeat with smaller models.. It is physically unprofitable to have a data center without renewable energy.

ChatGPT does not have their own servers- they use cloud in 3rd datacenters. LLM mentioned by the OP is Google one, so it is in Google Cloud datacenters.

Irrelevant (and untrue as I pointed it out) to this thread were your words that LLM/datacenters has a negative impact on the climate. When each data center has its own solar panels and wind farm, their impact on the climate is zero. So please do not mislead people with your false statements.

Nonsense. This is an analysis of what happens to your energy from any electronic device (such as a server in a data center) after it's done these calculations. The heat from the light bulb or the heat from the server can be used at a later stage.

ps2. By buying LEDs instead of lightbulbs you don't save at all - the "wasted" energy from them heated your house, so you paid less for heating..

Then instead of demagogy, learn something. "Microsoft Azure Microsoft contracted about 13.7 GW of renewable energy capacity for its cloud services by the end of 2023, part of its effort to power operations sustainably. It met its goal of matching 100 % of its electricity use with renewable purchases in 2025 for the first time — meaning it buys enough renewable energy to cover all its energy consumption, even as it scales up cloud and AI infrastructure. Microsoft aims by 2030 to match 100 % of its consumption “24/7 with carbon‑free energy” and become carbon negative, not just carbon neutral." "Amazon Web Services (AWS) AWS reached 100 % renewable energy matching for its operations in 2023, ahead of its original 2025 target. This means its total purchase of renewable energy equals its electricity consumption. AWS still uses renewable credits and purchases on grids far from actual usage locations — and industry debate continues about how fully this reflects “clean energy on the ground” at every hour." "Google Cloud Google has also matched 100 % of its electricity use with renewable energy in recent years (e.g., 2023), making it one of the largest corporate buyers of renewables globally." ps. Energy does not disappear anywhere, the heat generated by data centers can be used to heat houses or plant farms, etc.

When circulatory collapse occurs, cells throughout the body switch from aerobic to anaerobic metabolism. If hypoxia persists, ATP depletion and cellular damage develop. Reintroduction of oxygen may trigger reperfusion injury through the generation of reactive oxygen species. Some cells undergo apoptosis. To prevent irreversible cell loss, apoptosis and other cell death pathways would need to be inhibited - although these processes are activated for specific physiological reasons. 1) Unwanted or harmful molecules must be removed prior to the reintroduction of oxygen. 2) DNA that may have been damaged within the cells must be repaired (the body contains sufficient genetic information to reconstruct a correct version). 3) The cells must be “revived” gradually, so that they do not undergo apoptosis. The adult woman, Anna Bågenholm, was not breathing and her heart had stopped beating for over 2,5 hours. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna_B%C3%A5genholm

Well, they're just taking an example from your president.. ;) The AtlanticThe President Who Doesn't ReadTrump’s allergy to the written word and his reliance on oral communication have proven liabilities in office.(I didn't feel like reading this article either, so I asked ChatGPT to summarize it for me :P)

From her Netflix interview (said by her): Epstein wanted a child, so they asked her to become a mother. She was 19 years old then in 2002. She agreed. But she wanted to become a certified professional masseuse (what an idiotic idea?!). Epstein paid for her flights to Thailand, for her upkeep in there, and the school she attended (where she met her future husband). Paying for her trip was part of her deal with Epstein to have this baby for them. There is nothing like that in her interview. She called Epstein and said that she fallen in love, got married, and was moving permanently. A shocked Epstein hung up (and he cut her off from her source of income).

..after all, she talked about it in the Netflix series..

...and she later remained in an intimate relationship with them together for years, and later (at age 19) took money to become the mother of Epstein's child... by all means, it doesn't look like being a victim..

@MigL "What Are the Odds the Universe Exists?" What you are analyzing are only photons from different directions, with different frequencies, with different polarization. I can show you an image of the sky generated by my app, which will be indistinguishable from the real sky. "AI", these days, can generate even better ones. So what are the odds that you're looking at something that's real? Besides, such mathematics treats all particles as if they were identical and doesn't distinguish them by their positions on the map. It treats hydrogen on Earth and hydrogen on the Sun, or on the other side of the universe, as the same thing. And they're not the same. It's like counting people in statistics and forgetting that they are different people. Which is done all the time. We teleport MigL to the UK, and someone from the UK to Canada. It's not the same state as when you were in Canada and they were in the UK. Isn't? Give those coins from the movie indexes and positions in the series, and start all the calculations again..

I like that if you get a 2, you also "win" and have another chance.. so now we need to complicate our mathematical formula to take this into account. Because it changes a lot..

It is: but it is a different game than NL in UK. "Pick 6 numbers from 1–59 or go with a Lucky Dip® for randomly selected numbers." (from NL website) ps. I have an interesting conversation with ChatGPT about how this free Lucky Dip gives you a better chance of winning than hand-picked numbers: because people choose their own, their family's birthdays etc., and these are numbers from 1 to 12 and 1 to 31. This limits the number of combinations it can handle, as they must be numbers from 1 to 51 (or from 1 to 49, in a different version).

I know. But you lose if you have less than £2 after playing.

Not really. "The players who match all six main numbers win equal shares of the Lotto jackpot. The chance of doing so is 1 in 45,057,474, but the odds of winning any prize on the game are a much more manageable 9.3 to 1. " So the rate of return on this “investment” is 9.3 to 1 (free another ticket according to ChatGPT).

Because it's too cold in Canada...? ;) Comment of one policeman from s01e02: "some of the girls didn't want to talk to us at all, they said they love Jeffrey and that he saved their lives, he gave them university scholarships." The girl I gave the photo earlier, the one who brought 60 other girls to him, said she adored him back then and that he saved her life.

Let's imagine a hypothetical situation and analyze it. We have different countries and different states with different regulations regarding the age of consent and at which someone can get married legally. And now we have a couple who are, for example, 16 years old and 20 years old. And they come to Florida for vacation, where it is a crime. So what now? They are legal in their country or state, but in Florida they are not. They can be legally married in their country, and in Florida even having sexual intercourse would be a crime. Explain this to me. So they can't go on their honeymoon to Florida? What should happen in such a hypothetical scenario? After all, people go on vacation and move between states and move between countries. After all, no one will even think about checking such things, they just choose the hotel where they will stay.. This is not a documentary with a narrator! This is an interview with all the people who were involved. They would be questioned in the same way in the courtroom if there was a real trial. So what do you accuse them of? That prosecutors and policemen lied in a Netflix documentary.. ? During these 6 years, they would rather forget something, not that they discovered something that was not there before.

I regularly see "convicted pedophile Epstein" in the mass media, e.g. https://www.google.com/search?q=convicted+pedophile+Epstein But he was never convicted of pedophilia. He signed a settlement with the prosecutor's office, with a completely different accusation, i.e. "pleads guilty to state charges: one count of soliciting prostitution and one count of soliciting prostitution from someone under the age of 18." Every newspaper and television that calls him "a convicted pedophile" is simply lying. Because he wasn't convicted for it. The media is reporting false information because pedophilia is more clickbait than being a pimp, and because he's dead, so he can't sue them for defamation. (I think that if he were alive, he wouldn't have dared to do it anyway, because then his ex-girlfriends would be called as witnesses and the circus would start all over again.) The guy was a scumbag, and that he took advantage of his position, but that doesn't mean he was as bad as he is portrayed. He didn't put anyone in the van and drive away. This does more harm than good in the fight against real pedophiles. The line of absurdity is blurring. Have you heard about the guy who raped and murdered 4 boys aged 11-13. No, because the media is constantly talking about Epstein case, and there is practically nothing in his million files that would indicate his criminal activities. The fact that the queen-to-be writes to him that she misses him is not a crime.. After all, this case ridicules the fight against pedophilia committed by priests. Where real unwanted contacts occur, mostly between male homosexuals and underage boys, a way below 15. For free, not for $200. A 15-year-old or older would simply punch in the face if a priest touched him..

You're talking about some hypothetical pedophiles who had nothing to do with the Epstein case, because in this case he didn't do any of what you're describing.. At least there is no physical evidence of this. If you had seen the movie, you would know what it was really like. It was interviews with: police officers, FBI agents, prosecutors, defense attorneys, girls, and former employees. Instead of creating fantasies about pedophiles from completely different fairy tales. There were no children there. A 15-, 16-, or 17-year-old is not a child, but a teenager. When such a teenager starts shooting at his friends in the US, he is suddenly charged as an adult. Magic. And when such a teenager commits crimes herself, you defend her now, just because she is a girl? In this series, these teenagers basically confessed to the crimes they had committed. The age of consent here is 15. If he had done what he did here (knowing the real age, not looking at fake documents given by girls), there wouldn't even be a case. Epstein's real crimes were recounted in s01e02 35m, where his former partner in crime recounted how they stole $460 million in the 1980s.

Your statement is so vague that it is difficult to discuss with it at all, because it is unclear what your problem is.. Everything I wrote was based on the Netflix series from 2020. And not on the lies and manipulations of the mainstream media. I watched it this week. So my memory is still fresh. If you think something has been manipulated in this Netflix document, please provide the episode number, minute and second of the film, and a general description of what you disagree with. The policeman/FBI agent shows a board with arrows indicating which girl brought which other girl (after they had sex with him) s01e02 32m: The girl says she had sex with him for four years, and during that time she brought 30-60 other girls to him, earning 60 x 200 = at least 12,000 USD, knowing why they were going there, s01e02 30m: The defense lawyer says that some of the girls used fake documents to prove that they were already adults, s01e02 18m: This topic has been raised several times, but I found this quote quickly. The girls who appeared in this documentary had no problem saying that he was the nth man in their lives.

Reading your comments, I doubt you watched the entire Netflix series about Epstein. Take a look. They knew where they were going, what they were going to do, and how much they would get paid. And then they got other girls involved, their classmates and siblings. Want to "massage a rich guy for $200?" Why not. Need money. Let's go. And then the source of income dried up, so they decided to take revenge. The guy destroyed his life at his own request. All he had to do was ask them to show their ID. This should also be a lesson for you. The prosecution knew that the charges in the first indictment were very weak, which is why they gave him this plea bargain. Otherwise, they would have had to charge all those girls with the same thing. What does a girl who went with a guy for $200 and brought a few of her friends do? She was already a pimp. She got $200 just for bringing a friend to his house! J.E.'s attorneys accused the prosecution of ignoring the fact that several girls had shown fake IDs to mislead them. The funniest thing is that they weren't even pretty! Except for the one who was "Prince Andrew's girlfriend". There was a comment in the movie: "You'll have to do the same with Andrew as you did with Jeffrey. OK." It's just a question of how much. The guy had something wrong with his head, because for a normal man, a woman without breasts (i.e., one who is too young) is not attractive. But there are also girls who are 15 years old, and you wouldn't be able to tell them apart from 20-year-olds. So looking at age can be misleading as to whether someone "likes children" or not. People who have money problems take advantage of the rich. And the rich take advantage of the poor. Nothing new. If a girl felt she had been wronged, why did she bring 3-5 other friends with her next time? And she gets paid for it too. Do you know how it happened? One of these girls got into a fight with another girl at school. During a search, several hundred dollars were found on her, and she couldn't explain where she got them. The police finally got her to admit that she got them from a rich guy for massaging him at his house, where she went voluntarily. They started watching the residence. And every day, new girls came and went.

..most will find this a stupid question.. ;) Only interesting for spy.. Not really. From the amount of data you give online, it is possible to find your true name.. e.g. you said you had promo at year XYZ, Then somebody can lookup for face book for this year.. and one of these will be your photo.. and so on.. It is called OSINT.

Copy and paste this entire discussion into ChatGPT (you don't need to register or install an app), and you'll find out the rest. Just follow the instructions. Timelapse takes photos, and then you have to filter them so that only those that are sufficiently different remain. So you have to compare the photos with each other. Tell ChatGPT that you want a python script for comparing photos, and it will generate one for you. Android 13. Ok. Termux will work OK. Just start from installing it from my previous links.

Such an application takes a photo, puts it in the buffer, takes another photo after a certain amount of time, and compares it with the previous version. It is simply subtracting R, G, B, of each pixel between the two versions of the photos. Then it calculates some threshold, above which it will be physically saved. You can write this yourself. You have a timelapse and you have a thousand photos from the whole day. Make yourself a script (or have ChatGPT do it). If the threshold is set too low, it will detect natural changes in the time of day (sunset), which requires trial and error. Several frames in a row should also be tested to increase reliability.