Jump to content

Why is this Experiment violating the conservation of Energy?


Maximillian

Recommended Posts

It's not zero, though. The energy change would be the same. You decrease the height change by increasing the area and raising more mass. Or you can increase the height change by decreasing the area.

 

What you can't do is ignore it in your analysis.

 

Unbalanced equations are the greatest source of renewable energy...

 

There ought to be a name for perpetual motion machines based on this concept as it comes up "perpetually"...ignore a small change in energy as insignificant and then use it over and over to perpetually drive the machine.

 

We also see it's cousin that thrusts itself forward in space by creating it's own momentum...all by claiming as insignificant what is used over and over in some sort of circuit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.