Jump to content

Is there a common moment of now throughout the Universe?

Recommended Posts

Time "Moves" at different rates, even from a persons head to that of his feet below?

Yes. I think scientists, currently, can measure time down to an altitude difference of 30cm. There are experimental devices in progress which can work, theoretically, work to 2cm altitude difference.

Edited by StringJunky

• Replies 85
• Created
• Last Reply

Posted Images

Time "moves" slower in a walkers frame of reference, than it does for a person some distant from him, who she/he is approaching.

Thus the Walker" is a tiny weeny bit younger than his/he standing friend

Share on other sites

Time "moves" slower in a walkers frame of reference, than it does for a person some distant from him, who she/he is approaching.

Thus the Walker" is a tiny weeny bit younger than his/he standing friend

That's a result of velocity. differences What you said before is related to gravitational differences.

Share on other sites

Time "moves" slower in a walkers frame of reference, than it does for a person some distant from him, who she/he is approaching.

Thus the Walker" is a tiny weeny bit younger than his/he standing friend

Unless the two start off together and end together then the time dilation is reciprocal (or other scenarios to break symmetry) - both can do their sums as if they are still and the other is moving and both will view the time of the other as being dilated.

Share on other sites

That's a result of velocity. differences What you said before is related to gravitational differences.

I know that, the different parts of the body, say from head to feet are under different gravity forces, The head higher, lesser, the foot greater.

Time is also affected by movement/velocity.

Thus my two posts!

Unless the two start off together and end together then the time dilation is reciprocal (or other scenarios to break symmetry) - both can do their sums as if they are still and the other is moving and both will view the time of the other as being dilated.

Yes it all has to do with the frame of reference and the oddness of understanding relativity.

Share on other sites

Yes it all has to do with the frame of reference and the oddness of understanding relativity.

The reference is everything and nothing

It is to understand physical value and represent it with the universal language as it is.

1x0

1(any physical value described by the natural number one) Or in our case the hole universe as all space(time), information, energy, matter........

0: the total abscence of everything or in other words - space(time), information, energy, matter free nothing.

The Universe what we inspect is a cascade of events evolved from the physical nothing to everything what we see.

Regardless from the circumstances of existence everything in the system exist in the same moment of reality(A létezés körülményeitöl függetlenül a rendeszerben lévö összes elem egy idöpillanatban létezik.)

On the level of information we are at least 13.8 billion years old.

The matematical tool what we use has to respect the value presented as physical reality.

Mathematics is the projected explanation.

It is the language which can explain physical reality.

If a higher intelligence existing 1 billion LY away in the same moment of reality and it could ask you: Do you understand mathematical reality? Could you answer?

The operations of mathematics has to follow the observed reality. 1x0

We are not alone, We have a busy Universe but we can not read in it.

Time is information about the physical reality.

Edited by 1x0
Share on other sites

The reference is everything and nothing

It is to understand physical value and represent it with the universal language as it is.

1x0

1(any physical value described by the natural number one) Or in our case the hole universe as all space(time), information, energy, matter........

0: the total abscence of everything or in other words - space(time), information, energy, matter free nothing.

The Universe what we inspect is a cascade of events evolved from the physical nothing to everything what we see.

Regardless from the circumstances of existence everything in the system exist in the same moment of reality(A létezés körülményeitöl függetlenül a rendeszerben lévö összes elem egy idöpillanatban létezik.)

On the level of information we are at least 13.8 billion years old.

The matematical tool what we use has to respect the value presented as physical reality.

Mathematics is the projected explanation.

It is the language which can explain physical reality.

If a higher intelligence existing 1 billion LY away in the same moment of reality and it could ask you: Do you understand mathematical reality? Could you answer?

The operations of mathematics has to follow the observed reality. 1x0

We are not alone, We have a busy Universe but we can not read in it.

Time is information about the physical reality.

Are you hinting that I do not understand the subject, and want to put me right

Share on other sites

Are you hinting that I do not understand the subject, and want to put me right

I suggest that we have misconceptions in the language of the Universe. Right no it feels it is supporting a human conception or mental structure rather then the operations in physical reality.

Share on other sites

The reference is everything and nothing

It is to understand physical value and represent it with the universal language as it is.

1x0

1(any physical value described by the natural number one) Or in our case the hole universe as all space(time), information, energy, matter........

0: the total abscence of everything or in other words - space(time), information, energy, matter free nothing.

!

Moderator Note

That's the same nonscience that got your thread(s) locked. They are off-topic, and you may not bring the discussion up again.

Share on other sites

!

Moderator Note

That's the same nonscience that got your thread(s) locked. They are off-topic, and you may not bring the discussion up again.

Please Swansont give a physical example where 1*0=0 or any other observable explanation for this axiom.

Edited by 1x0
Share on other sites

Please Swansont give a physical example where 1*0=0 or any other observable explanation for this axiom.

!

Moderator Note

No. That thread was closed, and now this one is, too. Thanks for playing.

Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
• Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.