Hello. This is my first post...Joined a couple of days ago.

 

I have been exploring 2 images taken by the Mars Express spacecraft and

would like to share my findings. I have created a website containing over 90

images (Crops).

 

Thanks.

 

My website:

 

http://www.marsesa.9f.com/slide_show.html

 

Links to the original images:

 

http://www.esa.int/esa-mmg/mmg.pl?b=b&keyword=cydonia&single=y&start=4

http://www.esa.int/esa-mmg/mmg.pl?b=b&keyword=cydonia&single=y&start=10

KS42,

 

What are those findings you referenced? Be specific. Right now, all I can see is that you are promoting your website, and I'm confident that is not the case. What findings?

Hello. A sample of some images on my website.

 

Study carefully. Remember, These images are directly from

the ESA/Mars Express website. All I did was to enlarge

them 1.5X to 2.0X, seperate colors, adjust contrast,

and some filtering...

 

 

 

 

 

Everyone, hide! It's Extrasense!

I've attached a zoomed in image of a central section from one of the images. This level of pixel reproduction could not have been done unless the image had been mirrored around a central axis.

its quite obvious 2 of the images are mirrored. there may be other manipulations as well but i doubt it fromthe simplicity of the the mirroring.

its quite obvious 2 of the images are mirrored. there may be other manipulations as well but i doubt it fromthe simplicity of the the mirroring.

 

Indeed, I just thought it should be highlighted as:

 

Study carefully. Remember, These images are directly from

the ESA/Mars Express website. All I did was to enlarge

them 1.5X to 2.0X, seperate colors, adjust contrast,

and some filtering...

The forth image is symmetrical, you said you haven't done anything to it? looks like the low definition image of the mars face...

Hello. Yes, This is the so called face. The Face is designed to be

mirrored....

 

Another look of the face....

 

So urmmmmmm why?

i must confess i do not see the significance of these images either.

Hello. Yes, This is the so called face. The Face is designed to be

mirrored....

 

Another look of the face....

 

 

If its mirrored then what's the significance?!!!! Thats just flipping a picture round!

Hello.

The face rotated 90 deg CCW.

The face is not a natural feature. It is a designed and

built structure.

 

Hello.

The face rotated 90 deg CCW.

The face is not a natural feature. It is a designed and

built structure.

 

Prove it.

 

Oh you can't!

 

Occam's razor applies here, it's natural.

Italy looks like a boot.

 

Scotland looks like a witch with a crooked hat.

 

The moon looks like it has a face on it.

 

are these built structures? no. they are not.

 

The human mind seeks patterns, when it looks at a random data set it will find patterns whether they exist or not. i'm sure you must have seen something similar.a face in the grains of wood something like that. why would a mountain on another plane be special? it isn't even a mountain that looks like a face. it is a mountain that looks like a face when the sun strikes it in the right way. that is all. it is evidence of geologic activity and erosive fores on mars. thats about it.

So whats the point? , don't see how fliping a structure on mars 4 times is significant at all, and as insane_alien says the human mind seeks paterns.

KS42,

 

What are those findings you referenced? Be specific. Right now, all I can see is that you are promoting your website, and I'm confident that is not the case. What findings?

 

Yes... Surely, that's not the case...

Extrasense, how are the goats doing.

The Face is designed to be

mirrored....

 

The face is not a natural feature. It is a designed and

built structure.

This is what we can't let you get away with. Why do you feel it's not a natural feature, because it *looks* designed? You are drawing a conclusion with which no scientist would feel comfortable, and stating it as fact.

 

Tell us why you think the face was designed. No Arguments from Incredulity ("I can't believe you can't see it!") or circular logic ("It looks man-made, therefore it must be man-made") allowed.

I must admit that I like the pictures. However, when I stare lathargically into my mates beer and coke stained carpet, I see faces/images all the time! As it has been said already - the human brain looks for these sorts of patterns in anything.

This is what we can't let you get away with. Why do you feel it's not a natural feature, because it *looks* designed? You are drawing a conclusion with which no scientist would feel comfortable, and stating it as fact.

*cough*Behe*cough* *cough*Demski*cough*

Hello.

 

An equilateral triangle with 900 foot sides...........

 

Hello.

 

An equilateral triangle with 900 foot sides...........

 

 

ummm,,, where?

ummm,,, where?

A tiny bit south of center.

 

Seen from this distance, whatever it is doesn't have to be man made. It just fits a pattern you, KS42, associate with symmetry and you are leaping to the conclusion that that kind of symmetry doesn't happen in nature. I assure you it does.

oh yeah. doesn't look equilateral though. and still doesn't mean it was man made.