Jump to content

What do you think of cloning?


BubbaGump04

Recommended Posts

What do you think of cloning? I have really been thinking about this since I read the synopsis to the new movie Godsend that is coming out with Robert DeNiro. A major part of the movie has to do with cloning a couple's child who is killed by a car and bringing him back. Any thoughts?? Moral, ethical or otherwise?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Personally I think the specific application of bringing back a dead child is completely misusing the technology.

 

Ive yet to form a solid opinion on cloning - as a technology its in its infancy in terms of the level banded about the press. I like to think of myself as open minded but Ive been quite hostile to the notion of cloning in the past. perhaps that will change, perhaps not. It clearly has immensely practical uses such as organ donation but that brings with it a host of ethical issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have no problems with cloning, as long as it's used to farm, or make lab animals. and i suppose bringing back to life a newborn bayby that only died from an accident or something... or for that matter creating a new baby if one is incapable of normally creating one.... ANYWAY, i have no problem with cloning for the sole purpose of farming organs or anything like that. it doesn't present ethical issues in my mind because we would be breeding them to die, and we already do that with beef and pork and things. humans is just the next step, and i don't care.

 

the argument "What if it were you?" doesn't really apply. if we treated them like we treat me, or other humans now, then we wouldn't be breeding them to die, we would be breeding them under the false impression that they will live, and THAT is unethical. if we keep them in a coma or something their entire life, and just put the needed nutrients directly into their blood, then it's just a plant waiting to be picked, or a cow waiting to be slaughtered.

 

P.S. we need a devil face smiley...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cap'n Refsmmat said in post # :

I know that. It's been said by scientists before, so I think it's true.

my AP Bio teacher said differently, but i agree with you on that (although i believe the underlying personality is genetic)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cap'n Refsmmat said in post # :

I know that. It's been said by scientists before, so I think it's true.

Isn't it true that science constantly revises what we know?

 

100 year ago space travel was impossible.

 

The fact is that we don't have an anywhere near complete understanding of personality yet, so we can't predict accurately whether we will ever be able to store or duplicate it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As so many of the characterstics that form a personality are learned and formed through experience, I think it's fair to say that personality cannot be cloned. I think it would be a bad thing to clone a 'replacement' child. Not only would it serve to "remind [the parents] of who they lost", but it would mean the new individual being exposed to a preexisting set of expectations by the parents.

 

The parents would expect the 'replacement' to behave in the same way as the 'original'. Whenever the replacement displayed a behaviour that did not meet, or deviated from these pre-determined criteria (even if the new behaviour was valid and 'good'), the parents could not help but show, on some level, dissapointment ("that's not what our son/daughter would have done"). This would be extremely confusing (and possibly damaging) to the replacement. The whole non-conscious parent-child reinforcement dynamic would be out of whack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the only positive affect of cloning would be the scientific and medical help that it offers. I don't think that a personality can be cloned. Also, the clone may not be exact, as with Rainbow and Cc. They were almost complete opposites in appearance and personality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cloning a personality in the biochemical or neural sense is unlikely to ever be made feasible, if it's even possible.

 

But we should at least consider the possibility that at some point we may learn to duplicate personality and store it elsewhere, perhaps even imprint it later into a "blank" clone.

 

Much as I hate referring to the dumbed-down, often wrong, popular sci of the movies, 6th Day had some interesting ideas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-Demosthenes- said in post # :

What about the ones dying because they can't adapt to people taking their homes and making cities out of them?

Making more of them just means more will die. If you aren't adding anything new to the gene pool, they won't magically get over it.

 

Cap'n Refsmmat said in post # :

Cloning is good if, for example, those pesticides are killing the babies, so if you make LOADS of them (since there are like 2 left) they can survive easier (after you remove the pesticide). We all know having more makes the population grow faster.

A population with only two genotypes is a recipe for disaster, although the basic idea could be made to work assuming the right conditions.

 

(Also, in the case of pesticides, something that was so shoddily tested and applied that it kills the local non-pest wildlife is likely to have many other effects on the ecosystem too - possibly persistant effects - so there are other factors to consider.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.