Good day! My name is Zhandos. I discovered a certain pattern five days ago. Thanks to this pattern, I mastered all three laws of thermodynamics in just two days. I myself work as a lawyer and have always been far from physics and mathematics. I found the pattern in biology. And in the process, I realized that this law works everywhere. I know the answer to all the paradoxes of physics. At one point it seemed to me that I had gone crazy, but then I realized — it works!!!!!!!!!

I saw on the Internet that you are working on a similar theory and decided to write to you. I ask for your help: if I am right, humanity will enter a new phase. Just in case, my phone number is personal data removed. Please help me.

P.S. I understand the underlying reason behind the number π, as well as the Fibonacci sequence.

📑 UTEM — Unified Theory of Matter Evolution

1. Core Definition

The evolution of matter is a hierarchical process governed by the principle of optimal energy dissipation.

• Complexification = growth of structures for more efficient energy dissipation.

• Regression = return to the previous stable state when balance is disrupted.

  
  

2. Basic Formula (Invariant)

r = \frac{P_{in}}{\max(P_{out}, \varepsilon)}

• P_{in} — incoming flow of energy/resource.

• P_{out} — current expenditures/dissipation.

• r > 1 → complexification.

• r = 1 \pm \delta → stabilization.

• r < 1 → regression.

  
  

This is the universal condition of phase transitions at all levels of matter.

3. Examples (Physics)

• Law of conservation of energy = Core limitation: energy never disappears, only redistributes across phases.

• Second law of thermodynamics = formulation of the tendency toward regression (entropy growth), but UTEM adds the phase of complexification (local entropy decrease when P_{in} > P_{out}).

• Gravitational collapse = regression at Level 2 (physics).

• Photosynthesis = complexification at Level 4 (biology), direct confirmation of the mechanism P_{in} > P_{out}.

  
  

4. Predictions

1. Fractality: the same cycle “complexification → stabilization → regression” applies from atoms to civilizations.

2. Variability of constants: fundamental values may drift toward the optimum for maximal dissipation.

3. Black holes: regression protocol down to the level of elementary particles.

5. Key Idea for Physicists

UTEM does not abolish physical laws but unites them into a single meta-algorithm:

• Physical laws = particular manifestations of one principle — the balance of energy flows.

This text has been translated (errors are possible).

Moderator Note

Moved to Speculations.

You need to provide more supportive evidence for your idea. Please provide as much clarity in how you're using these terms as you can.

I'm removing personal information from your OP. Just not a good idea. We're a science discussion forum, and anything we can discuss can be done here.

That’s exactly what I was writing about. I’m not a physicist, and I’m asking for help — it works. I’m writing through a translator. Do you understand physics?

42 minutes ago, Zhandos_01 said:

I saw on the Internet that you are working on a similar theory and decided to write to you. I ask for your help:

This is a science discussion forum. We discuss science here.

Who here is "working on a similar theory"? Can you link to their thread so we know what kind of help you're asking for?

If you don't know any physics, how do you know to trust your formula? If you don't know physics, how can you make statements like:

49 minutes ago, Zhandos_01 said:

UTEM does not abolish physical laws but unites them into a single meta-algorithm:

Pick one of your predictions, please, and tell me how it works within the parameters of the laws of physics,

20 minutes ago, Zhandos_01 said:

That’s exactly what I was writing about. I’m not a physicist, and I’m asking for help — it works.

You know it works? But you need help with it? Are both these things true?

You dismissed it immediately without carefully considering it

15 minutes ago, Zhandos_01 said:

You dismissed it immediately without carefully considering it

I did? My intention was to ask you some questions about it so we could discuss the parts I don't understand.

2 hours ago, Zhandos_01 said:

I mastered all three laws of thermodynamics in just two days. I myself work as a lawyer and have always been far from physics and mathematics.

We used to have a lawyer here who was a damn sight better at Physics than this. But then I think he studied the subject a bit longer and more deeply.

I'm sorry to tell you that the used the wrong AI to summarise the laws of thermodynamics for you.

Further it should have told you to define your symbols, before you use them in mathematics.

1 hour ago, Zhandos_01 said:

You dismissed it immediately without carefully considering it

It reads like Ai garbage. I thought lawyers valued solid evidence and arguments?

12 minutes ago, pinball1970 said:

It reads like Ai garbage. I thought lawyers valued solid evidence and arguments?

I would also think that as part of their training they would understand that a) arguments are not the same as making unsubstantiated and unlinked claims, b) how to use references (!!!!) and perhaps c) understand what a theory is and what it isn't.

In most legal documents you will find at minimum a clear outline of the definitions used. Here, OP doesn't even bother to explain matter evolution refers to.

3 hours ago, Zhandos_01 said:

it works

Please provide some worked examples of it. And a properly formatted equation.

5 hours ago, Zhandos_01 said:

Second law of thermodynamics = formulation of the tendency toward regression (entropy growth), but UTEM adds the phase of complexification (local entropy decrease when P_{in} > P_{out}).

But dS = dQ/T, so if heat flow in is greater than the flow out, dQ is positive, and so is dS. Entropy increases.