Jump to content
Antony Howard Stark

Time dilation (split from The Collatz Conjecture)

Recommended Posts

Check this out first please . Well one of my friends brother who passed out class 10 wrote it.

Is it correct or is it just a good attempt by a 15 yr old

I know it's out of topic but since I've decided to discuss my so called theories on this forum I'd like it to start with this

I'd be very obliged if you all could just review and express your views about the paper.

 

A-New-Dimension-to-Time-Dilation-3 (1).pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Antony Howard Stark said:

Check this out first please . Well one of my friends brother who passed out class 10 wrote it.

Is it correct or is it just a good attempt by a 15 yr old

I know it's out of topic but since I've decided to discuss my so called theories on this forum I'd like it to start with this

I'd be very obliged if you all could just review and express your views about the paper.

 

A-New-Dimension-to-Time-Dilation-3 (1).pdf

I will suggest the mods move this to the Speculations forum. 

Also note that you must present the idea here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Antony Howard Stark said:

Speculation?

Well you said “my theories”. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Antony Howard Stark said:

Sorry about that. Can we not just  check it once and then argue ?

You need to start a new thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Antony Howard Stark said:

Come on its just wasting time. It is just a  4 page article just read it ones

Why do you think the rules don’t apply to you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, Antony Howard Stark said:

Come on its just wasting time. It is just a  4 page article just read it ones

!

Moderator Note

If you want to discuss it here, you need to post it here — enough information for the discussion to proceed.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Antony Howard Stark said:

By the way what is a moderator note ?

!

Moderator Note

A note from a moderator.

 
15 minutes ago, Antony Howard Stark said:

I already  did that it's in the pdf.  

!

Moderator Note

From rule 2.7: "members should be able to participate in the discussion without clicking any links or watching any videos."

Not everyone has the ability to read files or watch videos on their device. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Antony Howard Stark said:

I'd be very obliged if you all could just review and express your views about the paper.

Are you going to defend this, even though you didn't write it?

1. What are the "loopholes" in the theory of relativity?

2. Do you [the author] understand the difference between (and the significance of) the speed of light in a vacuum being invariant, and the speed of light in a medium, which is not invariant (like anything else that moves with less than the speed of light)?

3. What are the "inaccuracies which have taken place in practically conducted experiments"?

In summary, the paper has invented a non-existent problem to solve. A bit like asking if the speed of light is different if we paint the lab walls red instead of white.

Edited by Strange
clarity

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a conceptual problem demonstrated in trying to extrapolate from a light clock behaving differently in atmosphere to this being a fundamental feature of atomic clocks. Which do not operate at atmospheric pressures, anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 19/09/2018 at 10:21 AM, Antony Howard Stark said:

Come on its just wasting time. It is just a  4 page article just read it ones

You were very keen to discuss this yesterday. Why has it all gone quiet now?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I only have basic knowledge about relativity but thought it could be worth the time to check this out. The first part of the chapter INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND states:

Quote

In 1905 the great physicist albert eintstein[10] published his theory of general relativity[11,13,14,18] followed by his theory of time dilation

(bold by me to highlight)

Maybe just a minor thing but not a promising start. And it is then contradicted by the paper's first reference: 

Quote

Miller, arthur i. (1981), albert einstein's special theory of relativity. emergence (1905)

Unfortunately it does not look like this revision of the paper is worth spending time on. How was the paper reviewed?

Edited by Ghideon
spelling

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Er, I think 1905 was the special theory and 1915 or 1917 was the general theory.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Ghideon said:

(bold by me to highlight)

Maybe just a minor thing but not a promising start. And it is then contradicted by the paper's fist reference: 

Good catch!

20 minutes ago, Ghideon said:

How was the paper reviewed?

This doesn't look like a very prestigious journal. I wonder if he paid to have it published.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Strange said:

I wonder if he paid to have it published. 

Probably, the fee may differ depending on country of residence:

https://ijisrt.com/processing-charges

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 19/09/2018 at 5:39 AM, Antony Howard Stark said:

Check this out first please . Well one of my friends brother who passed out class 10 wrote it.

Is it correct or is it just a good attempt by a 15 yr old

I know it's out of topic but since I've decided to discuss my so called theories on this forum I'd like it to start with this

I'd be very obliged if you all could just review and express your views about the paper.

 

A-New-Dimension-to-Time-Dilation-3 (1).pdf

You were very keen to discuss this earlier. Do you have any response to the comments so far?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.