Jump to content

Did Christianity start with a real human Jesus?


mistermack

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Itoero said:

The strange thing...many people believe in Jesus' existence because the stories of Jesus are written in great detail...….this is the main reason the stories are made up.

So you think the Gospels are “Merely corroborative detail, intended to give artistic verisimilitude to an otherwise bald and unconvincing narrative” as WS Gilbert put it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Strange said:

So you think the Gospels are “Merely corroborative detail, intended to give artistic verisimilitude to an otherwise bald and unconvincing narrative” as WS Gilbert put it.

Not really.The Gospels don't make an narrative more convincing. They basically create the narrative. The nativity of Jesus in Bethlehem and Jesus living in Nazareth are only told in the Gospels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't think it follows that a real human is easier to build a religion around. If there had been a real Jesus, it would have been easier for people who were there, or knew people involved, to refute some of the stories. And refutation can spread by word of mouth, just as made up stories can. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On 10/18/2018 at 3:19 PM, mistermack said:

I really don't think it follows that a real human is easier to build a religion around. If there had been a real Jesus, it would have been easier for people who were there, or knew people involved, to refute some of the stories. And refutation can spread by word of mouth, just as made up stories can. 

I agree with the caveat that a religion can  e built around a real person; Joseph Smith for example. 

It could go either way so the existence of Christianity alone is not  proof of anything far as Jesus's historicity is concerned. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ten oz said:

I agree with the caveat that a religion can  e built around a real person; Joseph Smith for example. 

It could go either way so the existence of Christianity alone is not  proof of anything far as Jesus's historicity is concerned. 

2

A radical idea that goes viral is never by committee; the historicity of Jesus is in name alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.