Hello,

There is now a new theory in the field of physics that unify the concepts of dark energy and dark matter, add anti-gravity as a new force that is opposite to gravity thus making a balance that can allow variable gravity, black holes are instead black stars, and allow speeds higher than speed of light. It is also "singleverse".

The name is "Theory of Ma : Singleverse" can be found at Youtube and Amazon.

1 hour ago, Goku said:

Hello,

There is now a new theory in the field of physics that unify the concepts of dark energy and dark matter, add anti-gravity as a new force that is opposite to gravity thus making a balance that can allow variable gravity, black holes are instead black stars, and allow speeds higher than speed of light. It is also "singleverse".

The name is "Theory of Ma : Singleverse" can be found at Youtube and Amazon.

It’s pseudoscientific delusion based on pink unicorns. What made you post such a thing on a science site in the physics section? 

But hey, Im open to learn new things so lets see the „anti gravity” math. 

I'm working on a Theory of Pa: Solitaryverse, based on unclegravity. But it is half baked at best and not near ready for Speculations.

Here's a singleverse, what I wrote.

I hope it don't get on Goku's goat.

If YouTube's where the theory's located

I think it's author will get frustrated

at many requests for proper citations

and more explicit condemnations.

There is no way to coat with sugar.

'Tis another case of Dunning-Kruger.

8 hours ago, Goku said:

Hello,

There is now a new theory in the field of physics that unify the concepts of dark energy and dark matter, add anti-gravity as a new force that is opposite to gravity thus making a balance that can allow variable gravity, black holes are instead black stars, and allow speeds higher than speed of light. It is also "singleverse".

The name is "Theory of Ma : Singleverse" can be found at Youtube and Amazon.

!

Moderator Note

If you want to discuss it, you need to do so on this site (in speculations). Not by telling us that it exists somewhere else.

But if you do start a proper thread, consider explaining why this "theory" exists in these places, and not e.g. in Physical Review Letters