Aqshin Xavier Alisoy Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 So we know that obliques are bending the space-time. But I have got an idea that the obliques doesnt bending the space-time, they are pulling the space-time to theirselves. Or we can explain that space-time is like iron and obliques are magnet. So if any obliques pulling fabric of space-time and cover theirselves with fabric of space-time, it will become parallel universe. I know this is madness but without any reasons I wanted to share this there. I dont have any scientific facts to prove it. Think it like a just an idea. I hope I can tell my idea with my not bad english. If I have any wrongs in grammar sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Endy0816 Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 Obliques? Did you mean black holes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aqshin Xavier Alisoy Posted September 14, 2017 Author Share Posted September 14, 2017 yeah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silvestru Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 By that "theory" these parallel universes would be very tiny. Not really Universes but more patches of different reality I guess. *I say "tiny" compared to the actual Universe. Spoiler Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aqshin Xavier Alisoy Posted September 14, 2017 Author Share Posted September 14, 2017 1 hour ago, Silvestru said: By that "theory" these parallel universes would be very tiny. Not really Universes but more patches of different reality I guess. *I say "tiny" compared to the actual Universe. Reveal hidden contents As you know universes are enlarging every moment. Why dont this ? 1 hour ago, Silvestru said: By that "theory" these parallel universes would be very tiny. And I want to believe that you are not doing sarcasm by writing: By that 'theory'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Endy0816 Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 Has been thought of before. Main issues are the addition of new mass and the eventual loss of mass. Possible this wouldn't be seen as such in the sub-Universe though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aqshin Xavier Alisoy Posted September 14, 2017 Author Share Posted September 14, 2017 If someone has any question ask please. I think that I can develop this theory with your questions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Country Boy Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 Will there be pink unicorns in these universes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aqshin Xavier Alisoy Posted September 14, 2017 Author Share Posted September 14, 2017 28 minutes ago, HallsofIvy said: Will there be pink unicorns in these universes? I dont know maybe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mordred Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 Incorrect dynamics, charged fields has specific dynamics that are easily detectable. The observations of our universe is homogeneous and isotropic which does not match the dynamics of a charged field. Granted without any mathematics, I am only guessing at your descriptive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRadiochemist Posted September 15, 2017 Share Posted September 15, 2017 I had a similar theory to this which also explains the matter/antimatter asymmetry. I shared it on physics forums, but it got banned by admin because they didn't like theories. I'm not going to post it here, but I definitely think you are on to something, and perhaps we can work together to explain a possible split in the dimensions of our universe. Also, although I am a chemistry know-it-all, I still have a large background knowledge in nuclear and particle physics, as well as a huge knowledge of fusion research and electroplasmaic engineering. -RadioChemist -1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRadiochemist Posted September 15, 2017 Share Posted September 15, 2017 18 hours ago, Silvestru said: By that "theory" these parallel universes would be very tiny. Not really Universes but more patches of different reality I guess. *I say "tiny" compared to the actual Universe. Reveal hidden contents By Universe, you obviously mean ours??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aqshin Xavier Alisoy Posted September 16, 2017 Author Share Posted September 16, 2017 On 9/15/2017 at 9:37 AM, TheRadiochemist said: I had a similar theory to this which also explains the matter/antimatter asymmetry. I shared it on physics forums, but it got banned by admin because they didn't like theories. I'm not going to post it here, but I definitely think you are on to something, and perhaps we can work together to explain a possible split in the dimensions of our universe. Also, although I am a chemistry know-it-all, I still have a large background knowledge in nuclear and particle physics, as well as a huge knowledge of fusion research and electroplasmaic engineering. -RadioChemist Sure we can work together. But my English is not too good. I mean we can have problems in our communication. Text me on there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted September 16, 2017 Share Posted September 16, 2017 On 14/09/2017 at 1:58 PM, Endy0816 said: Obliques? Did you mean black holes? How the heck did you work that out!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Endy0816 Posted September 17, 2017 Share Posted September 17, 2017 (edited) 2 hours ago, Strange said: How the heck did you work that out!? Based off a connotation for the word oblique as something "not seen" and seeing roughly this same idea before in science fiction and popular science articles. Stephen Hawking has something out now, but not original to him. https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2016/04/18/black-holes-may-offer-way-out/ayFIhHEzAZyLjIZN7xWz4K/story.html I'm guessing OP partly used an automatic translator. For whatever reason, they tend to go with connotations when they can't figure out a better match. Can sometimes figure out what was meant based off that. Edited September 17, 2017 by Endy0816 clarity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now