Phi for All

If you're done being civil, you need to find the door.

You don't understand science discussion either, apparently. We keep asking you to support what you claim, and you claim you're meeting those obligations. I think you've failed to explain anything to any degree of clarity. Four pages of "Look what I made up!"

And ultimately, predictably, that's no answer at all for a science discussion. I don't know why you think it would be. We're looking for explanations we can trust, not ones we just have to put our faith in.

! Moderator Note If you wish to discuss this scientifically, you need to present these arguments along with any evidence that supports them. Please, no more unsupported conspiracy references (avoid the Joe Rogan intelligence-free, vividly misleading extremism). You need to start presenting support that obviously hasn't been seen, since all the arguments to date have been debunked. Considering all the evidence NASA has presented and testimony from the astronauts involved, it would be highly disrespectful and intellectually dishonest not to hold detractors to the same standards. ! Moderator Note To ask a question like this here, you first have to establish alien existence. No Begging the Question, please.

! Moderator Note No matter how much this might look like an attempt to sell a product or push an idea, acting as if they've already placed a commercial link in their post is putting the cart ahead of the horse. We need to stay civil until bad faith is demonstrated, please.

Can you give us an example of a black hole without an EH? "Singularity" is a mathematical representation of infinite densities and heat, and almost by definition can't be all that accurate, but every black hole has a point close enough to it where no amount of energy can move you towards a destination other than the mass of degenerate matter. I think this concept is messing you up. Gravity still follows the same formulas and equations no matter what kind of mass is involved. The mass of an object and how close or far away determines how that object curves spacetime. As Sensei points out, a neutron star has a smaller radius than the star it was formed from, but almost the same mass, so the force increases the closer you get.

It's mass is at least 1.4 times that of our sun (much less our planet), so it's gravity is proportional. Saying it's greater implies that gravity treats matter differently. A neutron star's gravity is no greater than a similar mass of normal matter.

By definition, it doesn't behave like a number, so treating it like one causes problems.

The problem with only visualizing from a limited knowledge base is obvious. You don't know how to visualize what you haven't learned, so your visualization may not adequately cover the processes. Maths would at least allow you to check your observations against the natural world. Do you have a way to test your ideas? We're following scientific methodology, and if that doesn't work for you, don't you think you need a way to check your process (besides "This makes sense to me") to keep you honest and accurate? Also, the problem with saying GR is wrong has NOTHING to do with your education or lack thereof. Please say it with me. The problem with saying GR is wrong is that you now have to show why GPS works, why time dilates in a gravitational field, why predictions of gravitational waves were correct, basically why the theory allows us to explain so much if it's so wrong. THAT is what you haven't come close to doing. And I don't think it's arrogant to baldly assert that your ideas are right in the face of so much science to the contrary. I think it's lazy, counterproductive, and a waste of time. YOU should be asking questions here, not trying to lecture people who actually work with atomic clocks and aerospace and cosmology, using mainstream physics every day.

I checked a few accounts, and it looks like both you and geordief can't use Status Updates. It's probably something you have checked off that limits other's ability to post on your page, including yourselves. It's not a newbie thing. I can post to other people's Status pages, but for yours and geordief's, those fields don't appear. I would make sure you haven't disabled this ability on your end, and I'll have an Admin take a look on the back end. Edit to add: if you Edit Profile, under your birthday is a toggle for enabling Status Updates. Make sure that's switched on.

That's not true. I read them, and then I think, should I do that? And then I don't. I just updated my status, and I'll put in a note with the Admins that not everybody sees the links in their profiles. On the home page, https://www.scienceforums.net/ , to the right side under Topics is a section called Recent Status Updates. Under that, my screen has a prompt that says "What's on your mind?" that lets me post a Status Update from there.

Try going here: https://www.scienceforums.net/profile/145388-existential-dreams/content/?type=core_statuses_status&change_section=1 Your content page has a Status Update section to the left. Click on that and it should let you post something to update your status.

On your profile page, under Achievements, there's a section that says, "Write a public message on your own feed...". I think that's where you update your status.

I think it is. I think the best analogy is a terminal geriatric cancer patient who isn't strong enough to survive the surgery that might save them. Without the Goof Troop, the GOP flatlines on the operating table.

I don't understand either your amazement or your perspective on this. To me, it's obvious he represents a block of voters they can't afford to lose. They may pick up some older voters by taking the high road, but I don't think their numbers are anywhere near what the Trumpets represent. The GOP already doesn't have the numbers to win a popular presidential vote, so sniffing at the deplorables sinks them forever.

As long as you're human, you're very welcome here. You get 5 posts on your first day (anti-bot measure), so don't think we're blocking you. Glad to have you and hope to see you tomorrow.

Why does this sound so familiar? Oh, right, the Intelligent Design argument, teach the controversy.

Make the Swamp Great Again!

Lukashenko is clinging to power the way Trump did, and for the same reasons. Both face prosecution by the courts when they're no longer president and their immunities are stripped from them. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ten-belarusians-file-criminal-case-against-lukashenko-germany-2021-05-05/

A man with one of the worst human rights violation records on the planet. He forces the disappearance of those who stand against him. He doesn't allow the populace to be surveyed or polled on their opinions on the government. Do you like him because you're afraid, or because you're like him?

I think that's what Putin wants people to think, so it worked on you. Has NATO ever attacked Russia? They've been pretty communicative over the last 30 years, and not once has NATO been the aggressor. It's NOT there to attack Russia, it's there to stop them from doing to NATO countries what Russia is doing to Ukraine. I admire NATO for what they're really there for, but you admire Putin for the lies he tells about them. Interesting. You can take people's word, or you can look at the history of NATO and the detente they've provided since 1949. It's weird that you think NATO is behaving like Hitler. Is your part of this discussion done now?

Do you have any evidence that NATO or Ukraine was interested in invading Russia? Otherwise, this seems like you and Putin are begging the question.

Lan Todak has been suspended for a month for continued spamming after being asked not to.

To me, reason is inherent to my thought process and I've exercised it like a muscle my whole life and watched it grow stronger. Logic is a formal set of rules to help us validate our reasoning.

Actually, in Texas women and officials are recognizing that evacuation of a miscarriage is the same procedure as an abortion, using a couple of the same drugs that are being banned. Women are being denied treatment for miscarriage even though it's not an abortion. https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2022/05/10/1097734167/in-texas-abortion-laws-inhibit-care-for-miscarriages