Phi for All

Does the Judging part of INFJ also include feeling judged?

Because it describes the interaction between two masses. But gravity isn't just a force, it's also an effect of space and time, sort of built in to the universal system.

The only permits I saw involved making ethanol for fuel. If you know about any permits that allow one to have a boutique distillery, please link to them. That would help us avoid breaking our own rules.

There should be a way to talk about this that doesn't fall afoul of our "don't discuss illegal activities" rule. It's legal in the US to make a certain amount of wine and beer for personal consumption. Perhaps the thread can focus on putting together a stance on why or why not the laws on distilling spirits should be changed?

It might seem this way, but people respond to learning situations in many different ways. I've known people who learn better in classroom situations as opposed to one-on-one tutoring. People who have a competitive streak don't always do well when there's nobody else to play off of. Tutoring is wonderful, but for some it can put a lot of pressure and focus on them.

Why would it? Why wouldn't a theory of everything be like any other theory, constantly being tested and upgraded as new information emerges? Stop thinking of it as an assumption (a given), because it's not. Theory is a powerful tool specifically because it's NOT a proof. A theory is always being challenged, and it always has to show that it's still the explanation with the most evidence to support it.

I used to place a great deal of importance on listening to candidates debate each other, but even our debates have become pointless. Many of these people running for office are unqualified to represent their constituency, yet they've learned how to sound-bite their way through a debate so they sound smart and effective. The average debate listener today doesn't have the patience or understanding for nuts and bolts descriptions of a candidate's plan of action, so debates get judged by how many times your candidate "owns" the other with short, punchy points that don't really mean anything. Voters in the US still think they're they ones who deserve representation in government, while the politicians know that the average voter can't afford it. The politicians ignore most of the People and focus on representing corporation People and billionaire People.

It's clear most US voters haven't even glanced at how other countries actually require their leaders to have a mapped out plan of how they will accomplish what they promise. Our politicians are mostly populists, and populists tend to represent emotions rather than ideas, so we're supposed to vote for the person rather than the plan, then trust that person to plan well. It's got to be one of the dumbest systems, shaped and crafted with billions of dollars to do exactly what it does, whatever that is. You are so right. The Republicans who live in southern Colorado and love their guns, or don't want the government to restrict what they can do on their land, have to vote for Lauren Boebert to represent those interests, so they're also voting for Christian nationalism, the destruction of democratic values, climate denial, avoiding equality issues, the stolen 2020 election, and whatever bizarre, ignorant, extremist, QAnon bullshit she thinks up. It's actually insulting to bricks to put her in the same league.

Frankly, it looks like a bunch of folks trafficking in sex with goats. The economy has taken center stage, and like most elections, folks are forgetting that Democrats grow the GDP about 1.6 times faster than Republicans, because the Republicans are better at claiming they do better with the economy. We continue to put politics into everything, 24/7/365. There's never a break from it. It's become the central hub for our Angertainment industry, which is also bleeding us dry and continuing to isolate people into ineffective little knots of resentment and pain. When the midterms are over, the next day the 2024 election starts. And as it consumes us, the process that governs us becomes more and more expensive to participate in. Crime is up, but we've always spent more to punish people than we spend to help them avoid being criminals, so that's probably just American business at work. It's also hard to stomach the supposed conservative right embracing radical elements that are probably responsible for rising crime, but it sure makes it easy to understand how it happened in Germany. Inflation is probably the biggest concern for voters, but I don't think they've listened to what economists have advised for quite a while. Many haven't figured out that putting businesspeople in political roles doesn't help the economy as much as it helps those businesspeople. Election integrity perception, thanks to TFG, is abysmal. Actually, I'll loop many Republicans into that crime as well. They continue to claim concern over voter fraud, and whine about the Constitution while actively trying to destroy the democracy it describes.

! Moderator Note This violates our Rule 2.3, References to the personal commitment of an illegal activity are forbidden. If you continue to discuss illegal matters, your account will be suspended or banned.

Not at all, since Vatican City believes there is a god, but scientists know there's no free energy. Talking to thermodynamics deniers is much more frustrating. They insist there's free energy that hides itself from people inversely based on the quality of their physics education. The less you've studied, the more of it there is out there.

This is a reasonable stance, but you're assuming early scientists weren't methodical, and you're ignoring the next step. Since every possibility can't be right, a scientist must start removing the ones they know won't work from the list of all possibilities. And that's what mainstream science is, the list of remaining explanations that match experiment and observation of the natural world after millions of scientists have worked their entire lives making sure these explanations are trustworthy.

! Moderator Note We don't know you, don't trust you, so please tell us about this topic without leading us away to sites we don't know, don't trust. This is a science discussion forum, and we're not here to boost your numbers or buy anything from you. What ground-breaking technology would you like to discuss?

Why give credit to gods when it was probably your doctors and whoever designed your car that truly helped you survive?

Could you talk about movement without space? Perhaps the problem is trying to think of only one part of the spacetime continuum. Three spatial coordinates and one temporal coordinate can describe where and when any event happens.

! Moderator Note Just attaching a PDF requires the reader to open it in order to participate, and many don't trust random strangers, so our rules state you should post the relevant parts here, in the thread, and include the document for those who want to open it and read further. So far, your PDFs haven't produced the kind of clarity a science discussion needs, so it would be helpful if you posted the parts that might help others understand your proposal.

! Moderator Note Can you do us a favor and put Homework Help questions in Homework Help? Science Education is for news about teaching science. ! Moderator Note Also, it would help if you expand just a bit on your titles. All of them look the same, which makes it difficult for others to remember which they've replied to.

You saw a joke in iNow's reply? I think over-sensitivity spoils more parties than jokes. I don't think of "success" as a spectrum, especially one that doesn't include a top end. As iNow mentions, it's all about context; the situation dictates how successful one's skills will prove to be. Success on a spectrum implies there's an overall guideline that governs us all. Is someone more successful than you because they work at a bigger company, or because they make more money, or because they own their business? I think there are some things that we work harder on because it means more to us to be successful at those things, such as a profession or a relationship. Others we can still be successful at without working as hard, such as maintaining the yard around our home. As to a minimum amount of success, it's still contextual. If it's my profession, I need to feed, clothe, and house myself and my family from the proceeds. If it's the yard around my home, there are community guidelines that tell me the minimum I have to do to be successful in compliance.

I see where you're coming from with this concept, like a bit of insurance to make sure you are covered no matter what turns out to be true, but I think you miss the point of the water itself by mixing it. These waters are supposed to represent a purification process for the believer. Mixing/blending them together makes them LESS pure, right? I think many Catholics and many Muslims might object to such a mix.

Just a different system than you're used to. I don't know how yours works, beyond primary and secondary. I've heard of sixth form? And you go to college before university?

Kindergarten through 12th grade in the US.

There's a special level of Hell where they serve drinks like that.

Right? And it would be very weird if I had several bottles of the best single malts in the world, and offered to pour you a scotch blended from a bit of all of them, wouldn't it? Almost blasphemous, really.

So it's allegedly a blend of all these waters you mention, to make it more sacred? Usually the vintage stuff is more expensive. Mystic Water sounds like the Ernest & Julio Gallo of the holy water world.

I didn't realize Islam recognized saints like the Christians do, but Judaism doesn't. Is there a process through the church to determine sainthood, similar to canonization in Christianity?