Jump to content

ahmet

Senior Members
  • Posts

    404
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by ahmet

  1. hi,

    are there any university for international candidates providing remote master programs specifically in any of fields given below  with suitable scholarship:

    ** cyber security

    ** software (I would get expertise in oop)

    ** data analytics

    ** linguistics

     

    target countries: egypt , china , russia or other countries*

    preferred languages: english, arabic.

    * any country wherein english is 1st spoken language. 

    Thanks. 

  2. 19 hours ago, dimreepr said:

    All I'm asking is, why is it important to you?

    mmm well , to me ; everything about security important in every time period. but if we consider long time periods ,then ...

    to my point of my view, creation of efficacious products are important ,not exactly money..

  3. 7 minutes ago, dimreepr said:

    define important...

    ah yes, but even if I say it is valuable you will ask me to define what valuable meant, and if I say it was effective you will ask...

    so,...it is circulation. haha ah ha :) :) :)

  4. 11 minutes ago, dimreepr said:

    Today you learned to be content with being wrong, or at least to accept the possibility; a great day

    don't we generally feel us uncomfortable when misunderstand an important issue?

  5. I found or learnt interesting points.

    look, one publication says that there is no method to define similarity (originality) for any publication when we consider the previous literatures (i.e. past events)

    however, if I publish my studies as a book and it takes an ISBN number , it will be impossible to copy paste (i.e. plagiarise) any chapter or part of my book for future events (i.e. forthcoming publications)

    I had forwarded my works to a patent office but now unsure to reshape all studies as a book.

    because as it said above that publication centre says that there is no method to say any literature is wholly unique.

    how can I be sure about everythings , really there is no such method?

    (among the details, culture and tourism ministry says ; if your copyright is available , you in fact, do not need to do anything.)

    (that publication staff also said ; the common problem here is about ethical issues as our copyright management (tourism and culture ministry department confirms ,too)

    (one  more notation: to our patent office ,  there are already some of works' search report stating that the studies were novel)

     

    arising question: if this is too much risky and there is no method to scan all of previous documents, why to publish my works?

    which type of benefit will I have?

  6. 6 hours ago, swansont said:

    In the US, if you only quote small sections and provide citations, it should be fine. It’s called fair use.

    You run into trouble when you quote too much; this can potentially impact the market for the quoted material. You should consult your own country’s laws for specifics.

     

    thank you for the information. Actually in the current case I can say that I have no earnings from those publications. One of my colleagues says that I need to prove those publications were/belonged to mine/me by defining their copyrights based on my demand. This action is being carried out by Culture and tourism ministry here by fee.

    I hope no problem will happen and I expect that the publications  really to be mine.

    6 hours ago, swansont said:

    In the US, if you only quote small sections and provide citations, it should be fine. It’s called fair use.

    meanwhile, may I ask what "small sections" means here. Here I consulted to copyrights management centre they used some sentences like this:

    "you do not need to use references when you use the information which is known by everyone. " (I also did not understand well this.

    6 hours ago, swansont said:

    You should consult your own country’s laws for specifics.

     

    may I ask , first step should be which of these:

    "consulting to a specşalist in the laws here"

    "to send a demand to define the literature's / publications copyrights to whom they beonged"

    I ask this because in case we know that those publications really mine, then normally no problem should occur (i.e. deep breath) ...but do not know what to do in case there are any inconformity to this case.

     

  7. Hi,

    under assumption;

    we ensured an association to publish our some articles by our request. then that association published those articles. assume please those publications include minor quotations. (E.g. descriptions or descriptive explanations ,I am also not sure whether really those publications include any quotations). However as the mentioned articles are created by memory (written by learning by heart) there is no research at the background in any of mentioned published articles.

    in this case will these published materials cause any copyright problems?

    and how to be sure on the issue with deep breath or how to resolve the case?

     

    Thanks in advance.

     

  8. hi, can anyone help me on how ;

     

    1) I could write a substituon in LaTeX?

    2) I could set the page borders? (E.g.: 4 cm from top and left, and 3 cm from right and bottom,A4)

    3)I could give numbers to lines ? (E.g.: 5 and multiplication of 5 number, renewed at each 5 number and renewed at each page,A4)

     

    Thanks in advance.

  9. 28 minutes ago, joigus said:

    Is what you want anywhere at the level of rigorousness as proving that,

     

    ε>0N>0/x>N(1+2x)x1<ε

    Ah yes this was good! but...

    shall we be able to find the delta correlated to epsilon here?

  10. 2 hours ago, joigus said:

    Hi. I did not address the second question, because I figured you would solve it as soon as you applied yourself to it.

    Apparently you've solved the 1st one but are unsure of its validity?

    The first question is best addressed with assymptotics.

    Here's a sketch:

     

    (1+2x)x(1+2x)2xx2x

     

    Now,

     

    (1+2x)2xe

     

    And,

     

    x2x0

     

    So,

     

    (1+2x)xe0=1

     

    Now, making it rigorous is another matter. In fact, I went dangerously off-bounds when I said x2x0 , as you're not supposed to ever say anything is 0 in assymptotics.

    really , I tried to benefit from (1+1/n)^n=e (n--->infinity)

    but reached to the same result and as you mention I could not be sufficiently sure for the limit appearing in the last line.

  11. 3 hours ago, joigus said:

    Sorry. I did the derivative. You need the limit. The limit is of the kind 1^(infinity), which are solved by relating them to the definition of e=lim(1+f)^(1/f) if f-> 0 when x->infinity.

     

    The result is 1, if I'm not mistaken.

    I'll take another look tomorrow. Tell me what you get.

    I tried this,  unfortunately i could not reach a meaningful result because of the persistence of ambiguity

  12. Aline I did not understand what you said well , what does ze and ya mean?

     

    note please I am mathematics teacher and the asker of this question is another maths teacher.

     

    this is not a homework help request. 

     

    in the second question ,the asker is probably asking the graph with quick analysis (i.e. local minimum/maximum points , asymptotes etc) or I suppose so.

    thanks

  13. hi,I need the answers of quuestions given below (one of my colleague asks, I could not find at its first look line)

     

    1) limx(2x+1)x

    2) the graph for 2xx2+1

     

    sorry I could not set the formula in the new version of this website. 1) lim x to infinity (2^-x+1)^x

    2) the graph for 2x / (x^2+1)

  14. On 12/19/2021 at 10:10 PM, Phi for All said:

    Do you really think ALL decisions need to be respected? Perhaps you're using definitions of "respect" or "anyone" with which I'm unfamiliar.

    yes. why not. because the definition itself allows us to think in that way. 

    I meant, that decision(s) for whom taken by those personalities. Considering this , just respecting to ideas and / or decisions does not mean those decisions. (Something like ...

    however, if you or someone else mean that there are some "bad" decisions available, well, I am not unavare of  that.

    Understanding & internalizing this section is not easy but should not be difficult also. 

    When a decision is given/defined as a right to anyone, yes , we have to respect to what / which type of decisin he/she would make. 

     

     

    23 hours ago, Peterkin said:

     

     

    Okay.

    if the content is really difficult to internalize or fully well comprehend , then maybe simplyfying steps or step by step might be better. 

    let  restrict the issue to two things. 

    intellect is prominent ,right ?

    in this case, one person may have intellect or not (if it is so much difficult to understand, this might be useful)

    if you are ready for more complex case, then assume please a person may have a defined proportion of intellect. 

    then it is easy to understand. 

  15. Spoiler

     

    2 hours ago, Peterkin said:

    You may think we need to, but we don't, and can't. Respect is also an emotion.

    well, the handicaps are behind the definitions here. We need to define what "respect" was. 

    So, we need to define it by logical propositions/expressions.

    for instance what misconduct mean,should be defined. 

    what impoliteness mean should be defined. 

    once  we define each of act behind the content of that "emotional keyword" then it is easy how and what to do for each circumstance respectively. 

    I think it is worth to express that, from the point of my view all ideas should be taken via intellect rather than emotions. 

    Emotions do not show truths, whereas intellect always noble and prominent and it is sufficient to take decisions via intellect. 

     

    2 hours ago, Peterkin said:

    Comprehend, consider, reflect, assess; decide. Some ideas have more intellectual merit than others and deserve to be treated as more worthy. Some ideas are implausible, impractical, hare-brained, unethical, or just plain silly: having considered and assessed such ideas, we are intellectually, as well as emotionally correct to give them no credence. In some cases, we are even justified in withdrawing respect from the person putting forth a very bad idea.  

    all ideas should be assessed / evaluated under the control of intellect. which idea is implausible / impractical/ hare-brained/unethical or just plain silly ?...almost all of these are the result of assessments made by Non-intellectual people. 

     

    18 hours ago, Phi for All said:

    I refuse absolutely. Some ideas should never merit anyone's respect.

    this, I did not really say which idea merited or not , in fact , the core keywpord here is "intellect" (can be figured like "subject" and the object is "decision" .)

    subject is always responsible for what decisions he/she made.

    but all we have to respect what decision anyone taken ,right?

    eventually everyone endures the result of what decision he/she made. 

    I see no complexity. 

    oh, dim. be please simple but clear and intellectual please.

    not always compelxity ensures good results. :)

    ....

     

     

  16. 13 minutes ago, Phi for All said:

    I refuse absolutely. Some ideas should never merit anyone's respect.

    but through far in the past of history up to now, not just one time ,but multiple times  we experienced that it has always been even high potential for any idea to show its face as another "reality". 

    Even, I think you can find some contexts relevant to this issue among your this website's rules (read forum rules and privacy&policy)

    I think you will perfectly find something for yourself that proves this idea was WRONG. 

    one another important notation here should be that none asks you to believe or accept the nature of  truth of any idea.. just respect!

  17. 4 hours ago, Peterkin said:

    All religions - all philosophies, all human ideas - are inventions. They do not occur in nature, and they did not come fully formed into anybody's mind: they evolved with and were developed by people. That's why crows and dolphins don't have any.

    it eventually brings us a mandate duty : to respect all of ideas!

    to simplify the case by basic examples & and original / real life practices, I can say that almost all of the people nowadays known as 'illuminated' faces ( i.e. everyone who lives nowadays) would most probably accept that a light would NOT OCCUR IN NATURE if we were to correctly follow your this ("wrong" ) idea.

    also, such examples can be multiplied ..roughly, todays "illuminated" people were in belief that earth was flat in the past (which is wrong)

    in fact, that stated  idea is common paradigm almost all around the people who would like to be known as illuminated faces or modern whereas the universal realities require more sensitive and close examination/vision and (i.e. CORRECT) knowledge. 

    ....

     

    as result, i think that closer and more sensitive approaches and works will ensure us to learn general trıuths which are universal and not dependent to any personal practises  and / or venue. 

  18. 3 hours ago, Peterkin said:

    At the time Jesus is chronicled operating in the mortal world, Islam had not yet been invented

    this is in fact, not a correct usage of accepted reality amongst Islamic world. Because Islam was in fact available at that time ,when islam had not been available yet.

    Because according to common sense amongst muslims, christianity was Islam in those days. 

    it seems you confuse something

    Islam is not an invention (like I commonly do) :) and it has not belonged to Muhammad (s.a.w.) 

    4 hours ago, dimreepr said:

    The same idea will be understood time and time again, because it makes sense at the time and because it's a simple idea; be nice...

    peheh :) :) you blame me with providing simple ideas. 

    I could choke you via my strong mathematical formulas ,eh :) :) :) 

    (but forget it for a while, I won't do that for now :) :) maybe later I could.

    :) :)

  19. well, 

    more than the exact queries asked & discussed under this thread, I came to one or more very interesting point(s) and ask question(s) within the scope of this thread.

    --- under the condition that jesus is expected (or being considered so), can we say that christian world was doubtful across something like their status  through the negation of assuming that islam religion would be (ever) wrong selection? (Because, that is a well known paradigm amongst almost all of muslims)

    --- is christian world also doubtful across the idea which states that islamic - holy quran should be not considered a book that states corrrect explanations ?

    ...

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.