Sensei

It's called Newton disc http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton_disc In CRT TV, LCD, LED, there are just red, green and blue diodes.

In post I wrote about all 4 Sulfur stable isotopes: "Sulfur-32 31.97207100(15) Sulfur-33 32.97145876(15) Sulfur-34 33.96786690(12) Sulfur-36 35.96708076(20)" I did this with Hydrogen and Deuterium, as an example. Just to show procedure.. For Sulfur it will be: 31.972071 * 0.9493 = 30.3510870003 32.97145876 * 0.0076 = 0.2505830866 33.9678669 * 0.0429 = 1.45722149 35.96708076 * 2.00E-004 = 0.0071934162 Summed together gives average 32.066084993 Your website gives: 32.06 Second entry: " 16 S sulfur 32.059 32.076" We're calculating average mass of molecule. In extremities of course we can take f.e. for minimum: Hydrogen-1 * 2 Sulfur-32 * 1 Oxygen-16 * 4 and receive mass 97.9673795424 u for maximum: Deuterium * 2 (or even unstable 12.32 y half-life Tritium) Sulfur-36 * 1 Oxygen-18 * 4 and receive mass 111.9919283156 u But it won't be average anymore. Just boundary theoretically possible (especially for rare D,S-36 and O-18) For sulfuric acid there is calculated average mass 98.078. I don't think so it's wrong result. See this. http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/sulfuric_acid#section=Create-Date They used the same algorithm of calculation of minimum mass (exact mass row) as I above. And got 97.96738 g/mol

Where is solution to Schrodinger equations allowing to calculate Helium-4 spectral lines?

f.e. photoelectric effect http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photoelectric_effect Photon is absorbed, electron freed and accelerated.. Photon disintegration of nucleus http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photodisintegration [math]_1^2D+2.22 MeV\rightarrow_1^1H + n^0[/math] To split Deuterium atom you need 2.22 MeV energy. Result is free proton and free neutron.. So it's not just freeing electrons (ionization), but splitting nucleus as well.

Imagine rocket traveling at constant velocity v=0.866c. [math]\gamma=2[/math] It has on board accumulator/battery, which is powering laser with wavelength 532 nm (2.33 eV) (in frame of reference of rocket at least). Laser beam is send to polarization filter. It's non polarized light. Therefor 50% of photons pass through filter, and 50% of photons is reflected. Then photons are escaping rocket. They are detected by detectors A and B. That are at rest v=0c. They have the same frame of reference. [math]E_0=\frac{hc}{532 nm}=2.33 eV[/math] Detector A sees 2 photons with energy (relativistic Doppler Effect blue shift): [math]E_A=E_0 \sqrt{\frac{1+0.866}{1-0.866}}=2.33 eV*3.732=8.7 eV[/math] Detector B sees 2 photons with energy (relativistic Doppler Effect red shift): [math]E_B=E_0 \sqrt{\frac{1-0.866}{1+0.866}}=2.33 eV/3.732=0.6245 eV[/math] In frame of reference of rocket energy spend on emitting photons is 4*2.33 eV = 9.32 eV. We have 2 photons in detector A, and 2 photons in detector B: 2 * 8.7 eV + 2 * 0.6245 eV = 18.644 eV total energy received. 18.644 eV / 4 = 4.66 eV average per photon (in frame of reference of detectors). Now imagine that we have polarized light emitted by laser. We can adjust angle of polarization filter in rocket and adjust quantity of photons passed through and reflected. Imagine situation where 75% of photons passed through, and 25% of photons is reflected. We have 3 photons in A, and 1 photon in B: 3 * 8.7 eV + 1 * 0.6245 eV = 26.717 eV total energy received. 26.717 eV / 4 = 6.679 eV average per photon Just by rotating angle of polarization filter person on board of rocket can change energy received by all detectors, while in its own frame of reference energy appears to be the same.

I have decreased price of mine vodka to ~10% of shop price by using Graham condenser. Right now I have 50 L waiting in queue for distillation..

Hello! Subject: Violation of energy conservation in (special) relativity. Possible? plausible? not possible? What is your opinion, and why? Best Regards!

String theory is not confirmed. Confirmed theories are basing in experimental physics.

If we cut blue photons (f.e. reflections, filter) from white spectrum, there will remain red and green, Red and green photons are read by our brain as yellow. I made this: (kinda yellow on my 1920x1080 pixels monitor) Zoom in: Just red and green pixels in columns. I mixed them in odd rows, blue filtered just 50%:

Or reverse - flood of data like in microwave and IR region of spectrum. Which is visible in IR camera.

I am kinda surprised that you're calling velocity and acceleration "dimensions". This way, you can call charge of charged particle yet another dimension.. And polarization another 3? Imagine simple math linear equation: f(x) = ax+b at x=0 f(0)=b x=1 f(1)=a+b x=2 f(2)=2a+b and so on with increasing x In this simple case x and y are dimensions, but a and b are not. X is like time, and a and b are parameters. They're not dimensions by them self. f(x) is predicting future "position" at different time x. Extend this to 3 spatial dimensions, and 1 time: x,y,z - position // increase of position by velocity vector every second (or fraction of second) x += vx; y += vy; z += vz; vx,vy,vz - velocity vector in m/s (it's kinda like a and b params in 1st example equation but extended to multi-dimensions) Then make vx,vy,vz variable in time: // increase of velocity by acceleration vector every second (or fraction of second) vx += ax; vy += ay; vz += az; ax,ay,az - acceleration vector vx,vy,vz, ax, ay, az are kinda like hidden variables. They're part of object. But not dimensions on their own. This is at least how it's implemented in the all modern 3d games. If something acts on 3D object, we change ax,ay,az of object, and this changes vx,vy,vz (in future), and this changes real positions (in future) (f.e. 60 frames per second: x+=vx/60.0;y+=vy/60.0;z+=vz/60.0;).. In the mean time there is performed collision detection to make sure objects don't overlap. Example: projectile fired by player will have x=player.x,y=player.y,z=player.z,vx=vy=vz=0, and ax,ay,az set to some high initial value in direction of shooting. Then by animating (decreasing) ax,ay,az in time, projectile position x,y,z will be dragged to the ground.

That's why I am showing alternative methods of creation of antimatter (positrons) which is happening on daily basis during fusion, and beta decay plus.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positron_emission

Russian people, you must wake up finally.. ! http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/article/russian-mom-faces-treason-charges-for-call-to-ukrainian-embassy/515104.html "A Smolensk woman faces charges of high treason after she phoned Ukrainian diplomats to warn them that Russian troops may be en route to their country, newspaper Kommersant reported Thursday. The woman, identified in the report as a mother of seven named Svetlana Davydova, is currently being held in Moscow's Lefortovo pre-trial detention facility after a court issued an arrest warrant last week, according to the report. The alleged crime occurred last April, when Davydova contacted the Ukrainian Embassy in Moscow and told them that a military base near her home had been virtually emptied after the troops were sent somewhere, her husband, Anatoly Gorlov, was cited as saying by Kommersant. According to Gorlov, she had also overheard a Russian soldier from the local military base telling someone by phone on a bus that he was being sent on a mission. Fearing that Russian soldiers were being deployed to eastern Ukraine, she informed the Ukrainian Embassy of what she had heard." Original material http://tvrain.ru/articles/leviafan_svinolup_raspravil_plechi_pochemu_mnogodetnuju_smolenskuju_mat_obvinili_v_gosizmene-381282/

Annihilation between electrons and their antimatter particles positrons is quite significant portion (4%) of our Sun released energy per second.. You should learn first how antimatter particles can be created.

Who said about ONE ISOTOPE? Not me. "If we multiply isotope mass (from mass spectrometer) by natural abundance, repeat and add all other isotopes of same element we have average mass of element."

I asked what *you* use now. To learn brand name, and model id, to look up on the Internet, and read parameters. Check whether brand is available in my country. Compare to what I used. And what recently shop owner offered me for $460. Whether it's fair price for parameters he mentioned..

That's completely different level of accuracy than we're talking about.. Difference at 3rd digit after fraction dot in atomic mass unit i.e. 1.0078 is equal to +- 0.931 MeV, nearly two masses of electron! Difference at 5th digit after fraction dot in atomic mass unit is equal to +- 10 keV. I told it once. Repeating myself: from mass spectrometry.. Nonsense. Ask Swansont how mass spectrometry works. Masses obtained from mass spectrometry for different isotopes are quite accurate. Your comment is equal to claiming that databases of isotopes f.e. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotopes_of_sulfur contain totally wrong data. Sulfur-32 31.97207100(15) Sulfur-33 32.97145876(15) Sulfur-34 33.96786690(12) Sulfur-36 35.96708076(20) Do you see brackets? That's what is uncertain.. Just two last digits prior bracket. That's +- few electron volts uncertain. Nowhere near +-10 keV nor +-931 keV like with 5th and 3rd digits wrong.. See how wrong is website link you gave: "1 H hydrogen min 1.00784 max 1.00811" 1.00784 * 931.494061 MeV = 938.7969744382 MeV 1.00811 * 931.494061 MeV = 939.0484778347 MeV What a garbage! Nearly 14 keV difference from real value! We know that Hydrogen-1 has mass-energy approximately: 938.272046 MeV + 0.5109989 MeV - 13.6 eV = 938.7830313 MeV 938.7830313 MeV / 931.494061 MeV = 1.0078250314 u What is isotope mass of Hydrogen-1 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotopes_of_hydrogen ? 1.00782503207(10) That's precise answer to 9 digits after fraction dot.. When we will include also Deuterium mass: 1.0078250321 * 0.999885 = 1.0077091322 2.0141017778 * 0.000115 = 0.0002316217 1.0077091322 + 0.0002316217 = 1.0079407539 u That's quite good calculated average mass of Hydrogen. Rounding it to 1.008 u causes giant 56 keV difference. 56 keV * 6.022141*10^23 = 5.4 GJ of energy (that's wrong) (in 1 mole of Hydrogen)

Hello! What brand and model of vacuum pump do you have, use and recommend? or alternatively which model do you disrecommend? Best Regards!

Ions in water are surrounded by water molecules. Water is polar liquid. Oxygen in water molecule has negative charge, and Hydrogen in water molecule has positive charge. Electric field attracts or repels water drops, which can be seen on YouTube (or home experiment) f.e. Positive ion f.e. Na+ will align water molecules around it differently than Cl- One will attract Oxygen, other one will attract Hydrogen. Suppose so we have plate of copper/aluminium. One end we are connecting to battery positive electrode, other end to battery negative electrode. Positive electrode has absence of electrons, while negative electrode has abundance of electrons. They attract inside of battery. But once we close circuit, using our metal plate, they find a way through metal that will allow positive ion in positive electrode be filled by electron. At the beginning electron on metal plate (or wire) is used, then his neighborhood. and this goes, and goes, until reaching negative electrode. Imagine room with seats, and standing people. They run to have a seat. Once they find their chair, they are not moving anymore.

1000 ppm (per molecules) is 0.542% (per mass) which is 5420 ppm (per mass). Which is all already in SpreadSheet. So disagreement between one method over other is 5.42 times (with 1000 ppm (per mass)). 1000 ppm (per volume) is 0.1% (per volume) (with density p=1.84 g/cm3) which is 1838.4557 ppm (per mass). Look. I am not wrong, and you're not just right. We're just differently interpreting lack of information in brackets after ppm. We are obviously agreeing on how to interpret: ppm (per mass) and ppm (per volume) We are simply disagreeing on interpretation how to proceed when there is just "ppm" alone. ps. I am doing quantum physics. We do care about precise calculations.. Application visible on screen-shot is made by me. It has database of the all isotopes (3142), database of the all elements, and database of thousands of chemical compounds. If we multiply isotope mass (from mass spectrometer) by natural abundance, repeat and add all other isotopes of same element we have average mass of element. Then when we split chemical compound to elements, look up database for masses of elements, and add them together, we have mass of compound. Calculated. So compound doesn't have to be in database and right mass will appear. This application does it in real-time while entering data..

It's not weird. It's your lack of knowledge of physics. "hole" is atom that has more protons than electrons. Thus overall positive charge. There is also reversed situation. Atom that has more electrons than protons. Thus overall negative charge. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ion http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_hole f.e. electron jumps from one neutral atom hole-to-be to hole, filling it. Before we had charges 0 and +1, after we have charges +1 and 0. Then imagine queue of such atoms, one stealing electron from yet another in queue.

Do you mean Greisen–Zatsepin–Kuzmin limit? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greisen%E2%80%93Zatsepin%E2%80%93Kuzmin_limit ps. I see no philosophy in this thread. Why it is not in mainstream physics?

It's not estimation. I loaded database to text editor and pressed ctrl-end buttons, and read row number.. Exactly 2,777,114 words for date 2012 July 20. 3 years old pretty old db. I didn't update it loong time. There is added couple hundred words per week or so. When people find words that are missing. Typically variations of words that nobody thought about.

In my language there is 2.78 million words and variations. The longest words have at least 15 characters. Many years ago I wrote C/C++ (and later .NET Framework C++) application which was using binary search algorithm on database (text file) for all these words and analyze them. I still have database (gathered from on-line scrabble game engine). You meant 52 billions rather (52,044,209,424)

I run your commands on my MySQL server. All commands executed fine. Although I would add to them IF NOT EXISTS (if it'll be real program). You should read about INSERT INTO manual, if you have not already: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.6/en/insert.html