Speculations

Please read and discuss whether my theory is right and acceptable: Here, Singularity before the Big bang = S Static Universe = sa Big Crunch = bc Unlimited expansion of Universe = eu …

The idea is that quarks are an electromagnetic fluctuation field similar to the one that caused the BB. The velocity of two negative particles act on the acceleration potential of the positive particle allowing them to pass through each other without anihilation, binding, or deformation. Charge in tact and they pass through each other over and over creating a field of vibration energy. The vibration energy disrupts the charge field of particles passing by beaking charge field symetry. This causes them to spin. These spinning particles cause the fluctuation field (quark) to spin. The vibrating energy condenses onto the rings of angular momentum. The rings spread out. …

Hi. Is this a diarrheical collection of scientific terms meant to confuse or makes reasonable sense to an expert ? In other words, was it written by a clown or an educated scientist ? Where was this copied from is irrelevant. My question is only about the interaction/interrelation of the terminology along the paragraphs. =========================================================== ... As a matter of REQUIRED reference, * the origins of life in the form of bacterial cells (publicly) currently dates to a little prior to 3.9 Billion Years Ago (BYA), quite an event for the early Archaean Eon * with promitochondrial en…

In various topics on this forum, I get the idea that it is still a mystery how or "why" spacetime curvature causes gravitational acceleration. Am I mistaken? Did Einstein and others who understand GR also understand that gravity immediately follows from spacetime curvature? It seems intuitive to me that it does (thus "why"), however the details are not at all intuitive, and I wouldn't even begin to know where to begin with the math. My basic "understanding" of how spatial curvature causes gravitation is as follows: 1. Movement through curved space means that the distances between remote points changes as you move through space. I think this is because distances in …

More complicated models will always be written in Ptolemaic epicycles, hence complicated explanations. The Ptolemaic model met the requirements of the church at the time concerning the Earth being the center of the universe. A simpler answer was that the sun was the center of a stellar system of planets, where the Earth was only one of the planets. This new model, only upon strong evidence, ended the idea that the church must always be the ultimate authority. Today I think we are faced with a similar dilemma. The 20th century ushered in many new theoretical models like Quantum Theory, Einstein's theories of relativity, The Big Bang model, etc. all of which have o…

Hi, The acceleration in technological development has so far been most successfully conveyed to the general public by Ray Kurzweil - especially in his 2005 book 'The singularity is near.' I have began a blog that presents a novel viewpoint. One that weaves different historical threads into a coherent picture. Please check out my first blog post and then reply to this forum www.zoologicalhistory.blogspot.com For my first post, I demonstrated that there are many points in history, that fall onto a trajectory with accelerative growth in complexity starting around 550 million years ago with the emergence of a centralized nervous system. The most recent commu…

1. Spherical universe: The universe is spherical; the galaxy clusters are the individual units. The natural energy of any cluster is mc2/2. However, due to energy transfer, the inner clusters have shortage of energy and the outer clusters have excess energy. Part of this energy is its speed and part internal energy. The speed- internal energy ratios of all clusters are the same at any given instant. The clusters are distributed uniformly, and the speed is directly proportional to the distance from the centre of the universe. 2. Thermodynamic process: The expansion is a thermodynamic process involving internal and external energies of the clusters. T…

Photons are particles in a field around the earth, moving with the earth thru space, enclosed in the sun's ether & rotating round the sun yearly. Responsible for gravity inertia. Electrostatic & magnetic forces are distortions in the ether at right angles to each other, light being oscillations between them. Satisfies Michelson-Morley & Sagnac experiments. Relativity works if the inertial frame is aligned with the ether.

C x 10-37sec = Our relativef, time plane's min particle ? What do you think?

This thread is a spin-off from the thread "simple explanations have legs" This was my quote: As has been suggested by myself and others, I believe that common logic is a big failing of today's primary scientific theories/ models which is one of the causes why many do not make sense and one of the reasons why I think most will be replaced by more logical models. It was suggested that this might be an interesting topic to discuss. I hope you think so Besides all the formal logical principles involved with argument, there are also a number of other logical principles that might be adopted for a new book on formal logic. Below are a few principles that I have…

ajb: a "property of the configuration" is reasonable, but that just defers the question to configuration of what? I think a useful phenomena to examine here is Compton Scattering. This is from the hyperphysics website, which I think is very good: The photon gives the target electron a "kick", and is reduced in energy. The electron acquires kinetic energy and moves. If you then repeat this with the scattered photon, you tend towards a situation where you have no photon left. All you have instead is electrons that weren't moving and now are. The photon has essentially been converted into kinetic energy. Hence I think "photons are pure energy" is more reasonabl…

Hello I am UserX, I am not a scientist and do not claim to know everything. But I do love science and in particular physics. My theories are based on based on science we can see and observe and it attempts to piece together things that elude us. My thought is that some time scientist are to close to the problem and that it takes a fresh mind to point out a something that could be helpful. This is a work in progress and I would like people who see the possibilities with this theory to test and critique anything I say here so that i can continue to develop these theories. The fabric of space time has always been a mystery to me. How it worked, what it actually was…

Something funny is afoot in the biological sciences. Labs peering into DNA are seeing things that nobody expected. And because the received view of evolution failed to predict these findings, and because it has little room to incorporate them, a crisis is brewing for the theory. Something more than selecting random variants is going on in evolution. The data coming out of DNA sequencing and analysis suggest that the something more has to do with a preferred direction in evolution. Phylogenetic descent seems now to be a developmental unfolding. Several discoveries point to this conclusion: 1. Junk DNA. This is not a particularly new discov…

For many years I have been posting my Bubble Theory or Black Hole Theory On the internet. I started my theory on bubbles in 2004. I also posted that I can't do maths. This starts debates on my theory being a waste of time. But I feel that I have predicted so many things now that I should be taken at least a bit seriously. Afterall, my Bubble Theory is a Theory Of Everything.. with no maths. I know that I am in for some flak, I am used to flak. This is the real Theory Of Everything... First.. the Aether exists. I have altered its physical attributes so that it doesn't show up in failed experiments. Second.. Gravity is a push from outside the Earth, a bump …

If you look at the Human brain you will notice that the Cerebrum is convulated. Apes have convulated brains also, but the brains of the nearest living relatives to the supposed common ancestor of Monkeys/Primates are relatively smooth. If you look at the brain of a Bushbaby or Tarsier you will notice that the cerebrum is smooth and does not nearly resemble that of a humans. Also the brain of a Monkey or Lemur barely resembles a Human brain. If you look at the brain of a Horse, Dog, or a pig you will notice that the brain looks very similar to a Human brain. If you look ah the cross sections of a Human and Dog brain you will notice that they are almost identical. The convu…

What causes black holes, as opposed to just big conglomerations of mass? Maybe something like a specific condition such as when a star explodes and great masses of atomic schrapnel are flung apart, coalescing into a conglomeration of atomic particles, without reforming back into the constituent atoms? I guess the particles would be too ready to reassimilate, though maybe not necessarily. Time to read this book and get caught up. Any ideas? Maybe if it had a binary of a specific makeup which it then collided with.

Illusionist The Creator closed his hands the slower a wave of negative the faster positive and right at a velocity two and half times the infamous speed of light clap two infinite bodies of energy particle-ized fluctuations slowed them down until speed and heat were realized distance created as an arena for particles to bond and collide or transform into weight when vibration and spin harmonized and if the conditions are just right two fields combine into one filled with so much momentum that it balls up and races side to side negative cannot handle the snappy changes in direction so it winds up way outside were it tumbles to meet the po…

In this post, I present 'The Finiteness Theory', a theory of everything formulated by me. Matter has a fundamental particle that has a fixed mass, fixed volume and fixed energy. The energy is in the kinetic form and the particle moves at the speed 'c'. As a reaction to the energy, force is created. Electromagnetic radiations are streams of such particles. The natural energy and the energy equivalent of the force, of any system made up of such particles, are equal to mc2/2. When the particles integrate, energy and force are used up or trapped inside at every stage, and so, the ultimate system formed has no external energy or force. The fundamental particles first i…

It is proposed that forces are created as a reaction to the energy possessed. Kinetic energy creates gravitational force, potential energy creates electrostatic force, and the motion of particles having potential energy creates magnetic force. These three are the only real forces of nature, ie, the only forces that have fields. The strong nuclear force is the gravitational force at the level of electrons/positrons. The weak nuclear force is a pseudo force – the energy possessed acts against integration of matter, and so is a pseudo force. The motion of the fundamental particle creates an attractive force equivalent to mc2/2. When these particles integrate, this force …

Perhaps gravitational force is a fluctuating force. Drawing energy in for fuel, and then pushing it out as waste. That is to say that: electrical vacuum energy is siphoned in, then converted to pure outward momentum via proton vibration. Kind of like a two cycle engine.

time is an illusion, it tricks you into thinking that there is a future and past. some one once aked me " about an hour ago i went outside for a ciggarette. If we are not moving through time, 'where' is that man who was/is outside having a ciggarette? Is he and i the same and the the time i experience separating him and I just a measurment of movement? Where has he gone? Where is he now?" i think your forgetting that you MOVED since then it doesnt leave an old you in time...u changed since then time is a measurement of what changed the happening is the changes you are making time is... measuring the change of a constant... like orbiting the …

My theory predicts that Gravity is a pressure from the Universe, not an attractive force. And for a few years now I have been deciding if that pressure has changed over time. Since I was a child I have often wondered how T-Rex managed to get up off the floor if it fell over. It has those reduced arms, and a heavy back end. It looks like it would be hard work to get up. And since my gravity theory is channeled through bubbles like bubble-wrap which protects us from a huge pressure from the Universe I had been thinking that pressure on the dinosaurs may have been less. This would account for their huge size, and predict their downfall. But apart from their size I had li…

questionposter: energy is a physical thing, something very real, but it isn't something tangible. I suppose a photon is pretty much "pure energy", but you can't hold a light beam in the palm of your hand. And yet we can make matter out of photons. Check out pair production and the inverse process, annihilation: (From http://outreach.atnf.csiro.au/education/senior/cosmicengine/bigbang.html) You're made out of matter, so you're made out of energy. And then it is tangible. The important thing is this: you aren't made out of anything else. And you can't create or destroy energy, it's truly fundamental, more fundamental than electrons or quarks. And like I said, it …

Preface: I'm not a scientist or even a science student. Since I was a child in Aurora, Illinois, the nearby Fermilab intrigued me. Various shorter readings eventually lead me to The God Particle by Leon Lederman. That work of popular scientific prose, in turn, prompted me to do more reading, mostly of Internet-available synopses regarding established quantum physics theories. I hope that readers of my amateur treatise entitled The Conundrum Theory will treat it as a simple narrative of my quest for a merger of science and spirituality. I humbly honor the true scientists upon whose work I ponder. Please read the whole thing. I welcome all comments and critiques, and …

Hello I’m sorry. I can’t English well. My native language is not English.... We are now living in the era of new revolution. Are we again treading on the process of huge revolution that occurred in the late 19th century and the early 20th century? The current observation of dark matter requires explanation on two important situations as the following. Situation 1: Denial of the gravitational (attractive) phenomenon Dark matter is five times more than the general matter, but it does not show macro-structure like the structure of galaxy or galaxy cluster, or micro-structure like fixed star or planet. The result of the current observation is that dark matte…