Sensei

You always come up with this nonsense when you're out of arguments. So let's look at the LLM statistics. ChatGPT 64.5%, Google Gemini 21.5%. 64.5+21.5=86% of the LLM worldwide market. Grok 3%. 86+3=89%. Are you all okay? I don't understand what you wrote here. I didn't write about any hypothetical things. Datacenter = the place where these LLM questions are processed. If ChatGPT (64.5% of the world market) runs on Azure, and Microsoft claims that Azure is 100% renewable, this means that 64.5% of the world's LLM runs on renewable energy. https://datacenters.microsoft.com/globe/powering-sustainable-transformation/ Same with Google Gemini. So 86% of LLMs are on renewable energy. Repeat with smaller models.. It is physically unprofitable to have a data center without renewable energy.

ChatGPT does not have their own servers- they use cloud in 3rd datacenters. LLM mentioned by the OP is Google one, so it is in Google Cloud datacenters.

Irrelevant (and untrue as I pointed it out) to this thread were your words that LLM/datacenters has a negative impact on the climate. When each data center has its own solar panels and wind farm, their impact on the climate is zero. So please do not mislead people with your false statements.

Nonsense. This is an analysis of what happens to your energy from any electronic device (such as a server in a data center) after it's done these calculations. The heat from the light bulb or the heat from the server can be used at a later stage.

ps2. By buying LEDs instead of lightbulbs you don't save at all - the "wasted" energy from them heated your house, so you paid less for heating..

Then instead of demagogy, learn something. "Microsoft Azure Microsoft contracted about 13.7 GW of renewable energy capacity for its cloud services by the end of 2023, part of its effort to power operations sustainably. It met its goal of matching 100 % of its electricity use with renewable purchases in 2025 for the first time — meaning it buys enough renewable energy to cover all its energy consumption, even as it scales up cloud and AI infrastructure. Microsoft aims by 2030 to match 100 % of its consumption “24/7 with carbon‑free energy” and become carbon negative, not just carbon neutral." "Amazon Web Services (AWS) AWS reached 100 % renewable energy matching for its operations in 2023, ahead of its original 2025 target. This means its total purchase of renewable energy equals its electricity consumption. AWS still uses renewable credits and purchases on grids far from actual usage locations — and industry debate continues about how fully this reflects “clean energy on the ground” at every hour." "Google Cloud Google has also matched 100 % of its electricity use with renewable energy in recent years (e.g., 2023), making it one of the largest corporate buyers of renewables globally." ps. Energy does not disappear anywhere, the heat generated by data centers can be used to heat houses or plant farms, etc.

When circulatory collapse occurs, cells throughout the body switch from aerobic to anaerobic metabolism. If hypoxia persists, ATP depletion and cellular damage develop. Reintroduction of oxygen may trigger reperfusion injury through the generation of reactive oxygen species. Some cells undergo apoptosis. To prevent irreversible cell loss, apoptosis and other cell death pathways would need to be inhibited - although these processes are activated for specific physiological reasons. 1) Unwanted or harmful molecules must be removed prior to the reintroduction of oxygen. 2) DNA that may have been damaged within the cells must be repaired (the body contains sufficient genetic information to reconstruct a correct version). 3) The cells must be “revived” gradually, so that they do not undergo apoptosis. The adult woman, Anna Bågenholm, was not breathing and her heart had stopped beating for over 2,5 hours. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna_B%C3%A5genholm

Well, they're just taking an example from your president.. ;) The AtlanticThe President Who Doesn't ReadTrump’s allergy to the written word and his reliance on oral communication have proven liabilities in office.(I didn't feel like reading this article either, so I asked ChatGPT to summarize it for me :P)

From her Netflix interview (said by her): Epstein wanted a child, so they asked her to become a mother. She was 19 years old then in 2002. She agreed. But she wanted to become a certified professional masseuse (what an idiotic idea?!). Epstein paid for her flights to Thailand, for her upkeep in there, and the school she attended (where she met her future husband). Paying for her trip was part of her deal with Epstein to have this baby for them. There is nothing like that in her interview. She called Epstein and said that she fallen in love, got married, and was moving permanently. A shocked Epstein hung up (and he cut her off from her source of income).

..after all, she talked about it in the Netflix series..

...and she later remained in an intimate relationship with them together for years, and later (at age 19) took money to become the mother of Epstein's child... by all means, it doesn't look like being a victim..

@MigL "What Are the Odds the Universe Exists?" What you are analyzing are only photons from different directions, with different frequencies, with different polarization. I can show you an image of the sky generated by my app, which will be indistinguishable from the real sky. "AI", these days, can generate even better ones. So what are the odds that you're looking at something that's real? Besides, such mathematics treats all particles as if they were identical and doesn't distinguish them by their positions on the map. It treats hydrogen on Earth and hydrogen on the Sun, or on the other side of the universe, as the same thing. And they're not the same. It's like counting people in statistics and forgetting that they are different people. Which is done all the time. We teleport MigL to the UK, and someone from the UK to Canada. It's not the same state as when you were in Canada and they were in the UK. Isn't? Give those coins from the movie indexes and positions in the series, and start all the calculations again..

I like that if you get a 2, you also "win" and have another chance.. so now we need to complicate our mathematical formula to take this into account. Because it changes a lot..

It is: but it is a different game than NL in UK. "Pick 6 numbers from 1–59 or go with a Lucky Dip® for randomly selected numbers." (from NL website) ps. I have an interesting conversation with ChatGPT about how this free Lucky Dip gives you a better chance of winning than hand-picked numbers: because people choose their own, their family's birthdays etc., and these are numbers from 1 to 12 and 1 to 31. This limits the number of combinations it can handle, as they must be numbers from 1 to 51 (or from 1 to 49, in a different version).

I know. But you lose if you have less than £2 after playing.