Science Forums: Making heavy water - Science Forums

Jump to content

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net! We welcome science discussion at all levels — from beginners to researchers, covering topics from biology to computer science, and much more. Registration is fast and free, and allows you to post on the forums, so register now and join the discussions!
  
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help  registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.

  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Create a ScienceForums.Net Blog!
Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse
  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Making heavy water Rate Topic: -----

#1 Curix 


Quark
Hello, I have found me a new useless project: making heavy water.
Q:Why? A:I dont know.
Q:What are you going to do with it? A:Posess it, or I will get the D of it.

Well, I have some questions about it, are there other ways than Electrolysis of Water? They told me: try distillation, but isn't it cheaper just to let water vapourise and safe the last bits of water and vapourise that again and again and again? I don't mean to heat the wather, just let it stand there till there is only 1/10 left.

will it work?
0

#2 John Cuthber 


Icon
Chemistry Expert
Do you know how little heavy water there is inn ordinary water?
Also, letting the water evaporate does concentrate the heavy water, but not very well. A lot of the heavy water evaporates along with the light water.
How will you tell if you have increased the heavy water concentration?
0

#3 Curix 


Quark

John Cuthber said:

Do you know how little heavy water there is inn ordinary water?



6000 molecules of the one million, and I will know if it is heavy water by weighing it. Yes it will take a while, I think some months but after a while and lots of water, I should have around the 60% heavy water, isn't it?
0

#4 John Cuthber 


Icon
Chemistry Expert
Where do you get the 60% figure from?
0

#5 Rocket Man 


Molecule
heavy water is 17th heavier than ordinary water. i'd recomend electrolysing and putting the hydrogen gas in a centrifuge or chilling it to ridiculously low temperatures.
or exposing ordinary hydrogen to a neutron source. (does that work?)

six parts per thousand is a bit over the top by several orders of magnitude. 6ml of heavy out of a litre? i don't think so.
There's a fine line between genius and insanity, I have erased this line. – Oscar Levant

No trees were killed in the sending of this message. however, several million electrons were greatly inconvenienced.
0

#6 John Cuthber 


Icon
Chemistry Expert
"heavy water is 17th heavier than ordinary water"
In the very real senses that heavy water has a molecular weight of 20.04 where ordinary water is 18.053.
Of course, that quote might have meant its density is 1/17 greater which would have been roughly equally wrong since it's about 1/9 greater.
About 1 molecule in 6400 of ordinary water is HDO (a lot fewer ar DDO).
I'd have to sit and think about it but I have a feeling that the relatively large amount of oxygen present messes up the 6ml from 1L idea. If anyone wants to do the
1 litre of water is so many moles so it has so many molecules which gives 1/6400 molecules of D2 which would give so many moles of heavy water ie such and such a volume maths
it might be interesting.

I'd still like to know where the 60% figure came from.
0

#7 Rocket Man 


Molecule
unless you're talking about tritium water(not naturally occuring) or DDO, heavy water has a molecular mass of very slightly less than 19. where did you get 18.053 for water?
There's a fine line between genius and insanity, I have erased this line. – Oscar Levant

No trees were killed in the sending of this message. however, several million electrons were greatly inconvenienced.
0

#8 insane_alien 


Genius
O = roughly 16 AMU H = roughly 1 AMU

16 + 1 + 1 = 18

D= roughly 2

DDO 16 + 2 +2 =20. it'll be more than 19. HDO will be roughly 19.
Tired of waiting around for a reply on the forums? Use IRC, 'I don't know how' is no longer an excuse.

"Special" Relativity, stupid ideas seem smarter when they come at you really fast.
0

#9 John Cuthber 


Icon
Chemistry Expert
"unless you're talking about tritium water(not naturally occuring) or DDO, heavy water has a molecular mass of very slightly less than 19"
Rocket man, DDO is heavy water so, yes, I'm talking about D2O.
"where did you get 18.053 for water?"
Oops!, I'm not sure, probably by missreading/ mistyping from wiki
http://en.wikipedia....ean_Ocean_Water
gives 18.015268 grams per mole
The Merck index gives 18.016.
0

#10 pioneer 


Protist
One can make heavy water using only a couple of basic principles of science. First heavy water contains D, T and not just H. The extra neutrons implies these isotopes of hydrogen are heavier. This will make the heavy water heavier than regular water. So let us use this to our advantage. Since heavy water and regular water is so close in weight, and since water has binding forces that will prevent separation of density, we need to overcome this with a little trick.

The simpliest way is electrolysis to make H2, HD, D2, etc.. Now the percentage weight differences are much higher. Here is what you do, you take this gas mixture and let it diffuse down a long pipe. Since H2 is the lightest, it will get to the end first. The HD will be next and then the D2 will be last. The binding forces between hydrogen gas is very weak so they will diffuse more or independantly. Then you take some of the O2 from the electrolysis, and react it with the collected D2, to make D2O. The yield will be tiny and it may not be pure; it gives you plump water.
0

#11 Rocket Man 


Molecule
tritium has a half life of about 12 years so you are not going to collect any of that.
if you take six parts per thousand as the conc of heavy water, the concentration of DDO is probably 36 parts per million.
if you want heavy water, you want to look for HDO and you'll need one hell of a centrifuge.
i still doubt 6:1K, i'll do some research

edit:
from wiki

Quote

Semiheavy water, HDO, occurs naturally in regular water at a proportion of about 1 molecule in 3,200 (each hydrogen has a probability of 1 in 6,400 of being D). Heavy water, D2O, by comparison, occurs naturally at a proportion of about 1 molecule in 41 million (i.e., 1 in 6,4002).

There's a fine line between genius and insanity, I have erased this line. – Oscar Levant

No trees were killed in the sending of this message. however, several million electrons were greatly inconvenienced.
0

#12 Curix 


Quark

John Cuthber said:

Where do you get the 60% figure from?


figure? I just mean that I am glad if I get a 60+% percentage of heavy water.

but I have calculated (sort of) the amount of water that I will need, and it needs to be very very much. so... Can somebody tell me where to buy some ml heavy water?
0

#13 John Cuthber 


Icon
Chemistry Expert
I got some from ebay but the easy way is to buy it from a chemical supplier. It's not a restricted product.
1

#14 alan2here 


Molecule
nothing is restricted
united nuclear sell uranium and ebay sells soduim
This applies to the above post and any new ideas or media presented in it.

with-logic.co.uk

my DeviantArt CA calendar
0

#15 grandzilla 


Lepton
Anybody remember years ago a high school student making heavy water for a science project? NASA had spent millions trying to figure it out and this kid did it in his mom's kitchen. Maybe about 25 years ago. Any info?
1

#16 insane_alien 


Genius
grandzilla, there is a slight difference in scale.

on a small lab scale like the high school student, it is relatively easy to make heavy water. however making several thousand tonnes at a time has some very big issues, mostly in the cost and time department.
Tired of waiting around for a reply on the forums? Use IRC, 'I don't know how' is no longer an excuse.

"Special" Relativity, stupid ideas seem smarter when they come at you really fast.
0

#17 noobrication 


Lepton
Heavy Waters natural occurance is only 0.015%, so it may take a lot of filtration or distilation, to get any meaningful amounts :-(
How did the electron get on the bus?
-It Lepton
0

#18 insane_alien 


Genius
filtration won't get you anywhere.

distillation will only be slightly better, rough back of the envelope calculations tell me that to get a 50% mole fraction of heavy water your going to need a distillation column at least 25km high.
Tired of waiting around for a reply on the forums? Use IRC, 'I don't know how' is no longer an excuse.

"Special" Relativity, stupid ideas seem smarter when they come at you really fast.
0

#19 alan2here 


Molecule

insane_alien said:

your going to need a distillation column at least 25km high.

Could it be corkscrew shaped for efficiency of height to length?
This applies to the above post and any new ideas or media presented in it.

with-logic.co.uk

my DeviantArt CA calendar
0

#20 insane_alien 


Genius
not really, you could split the column up into more manageable chunks and just pump to top stream from the previous column into the bottom stream of the next.

but its still going to be impractical. you would need hundreds of columns and all just for one feed. and your product stream is going to be just a trickle compared to the torrent thats going into feed. not to mention distillation columns are expensive, expensive to build and expensive to run. especially when the relative volatilities are so close.

EDIT: whoops, mean to say, bottom stream of the previous into the next column.

This post has been edited by insane_alien: 19 October 2008 - 11:38 AM

Tired of waiting around for a reply on the forums? Use IRC, 'I don't know how' is no longer an excuse.

"Special" Relativity, stupid ideas seem smarter when they come at you really fast.
0

Share this topic:


  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users